Any war with China is ‘likely to be around Taiwan’

The Senate on Wednesday overwhelmingly passed a $768 billion defense policy bill that directs the president to create a “grand strategy” to address global economic and military threats posed by China.

That vote came as news emerged that U.S. military commanders have created a software tool designed to predict how China will react to U.S. activities in the area, such as U.S. officials’ visits to Taiwan.

In a new interview taped Monday, billionaire hedge fund titan Ray Dalio said a military confrontation between the U.S. and China is unlikely for now. However, he added that if a U.S-China war does break out, it will likely be over Taiwan, a disputed entity roughly 100 miles off the coast of Southeastern China.

“Well, I think if there’s going to be a military war issue, it is likely to be around Taiwan,” Dalio told Yahoo Finance’s editor-in-chief, Andy Serwer. Later, Dalio added, “Watch what’s going on closely with Taiwan, and you’ll see the straws in the wind.”

While Taiwan has a democratically elected government and a “robust unofficial relationship with the U.S.,” the United Nations doesn’t recognize it as an independent country. As Serwer noted in a column for Yahoo Finance last month, Taiwan has been in political limbo since the Chinese Civil War nearly three-quarters of a century ago. But more recently, tensions between the U.S. and China over Taiwan have flared up.

People wear a face mask to prevent the spread of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) while passing a night market in Taipei, Taiwan, August 6, 2020. REUTERS/Ann Wang

People wear a face mask to prevent the spread of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) while passing a night market in Taipei, Taiwan, August 6, 2020. REUTERS/Ann Wang

Communist China, for its part, insists that Taiwan is a province of the mainland. The country has repeatedly entered Taiwan’s air defense zone in the past year, and in October, China condemned the U.S. and Canada for trying to “stir up trouble” by sending warships through the Taiwan Strait.

Speaking to Yahoo Finance, Dalio described the status of Taiwan and its potential to provoke military action between the U.S. and China this way: “It’s an important issue that might be, could be fought over. I think that you watch it.”

This was far from the first time Dalio has commented on China tensions. He’s faced backlash over the fact that his hedge fund, Bridgewater Associates, has investments in China — particularly after an interview with CNBC last month where he seemingly likened the country’s autocratic government to a “stern parent.” In a Dec. 5 LinkedIn post clarifying the statement, he said that view was not his own, but rather, he was explaining what a Chinese leader told him about the country’s approach to governing. 

Dalio went on to note that Bridgewater invests in about 40 countries, including China, and that it relies on guidance from regulators in those countries and in the U.S. However, he added: “Having said all this, what I think and what Bridgewater does are of minuscule importance relative to the rapidly growing risk of U.S. war with China due to misunderstandings and inclinations to fight …”

War is far from Dalio’s only concern about China, however. In his new book, “Principles for Dealing with the Changing World Order,” the hedge fund manager expresses certainty that China will become a greater world power than the U.S., as a Wall Street Journal review noted. He reiterated this prediction to Yahoo Finance.

“The population of China has four times that of the United States,” Dalio noted. “So if it has an average income of half the United States, it will be twice as large as the United States.”

While China may someday become a greater world power than the U.S., its economy has suffered amid the pandemic, the country’s regulatory crackdown on Chinese companies, and a prolonged property downturn sparked in part by the downfall of mega-developer Evergrande

For his part, Dalio stressed that the U.S. should turn its focus toward itself. “If we do the right things, to be strong, so that we are stronger than any opposition in the world,” he said, “we won’t have a problem.”

Erin Fuchs is deputy managing editor at Yahoo Finance.

Read the latest financial and business news from Yahoo Finance

Follow Yahoo Finance on Twitter, Instagram, YouTube, Facebook, Flipboard, and LinkedIn

Meta/Facebook is the worst company of the year: Yahoo Finance readers

Every December, Yahoo Finance selects a Company of the Year, based on its market performance and its achievements that particular year. In 2021, Microsoft (MSFT) took home the crown, smashing through the $2 trillion market capitalization mark and seeing a 53{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} surge in its stock price as of Dec. 16, year-to-date.

However, the spirit of Festivus has taught us we can learn just as much from the bad as the good by airing our grievances. That’s why Yahoo Finance also selects a Worst Company of the Year, polling our audience as to which company upset them the most.

Our survey’s 1,541 respondents were mad about a lot this year, from the Robinhood (HOOD) trading freezes last winter to electric truck startup Nikola still not having its act together. But one company irked them the most — Facebook (FB). The survey’s results shed more light on why the company decided to rebrand this year to a new name: Meta Platforms.

The open-ended survey was posted on Yahoo Finance on Dec. 4 and Dec. 5, and dozens of names were submitted. Facebook received 8{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} of the write-in vote.

Facebook has had its share of controversies this year. It’s been under the antitrust microscope and faced a flurry of allegations from a whistleblower claiming Facebook ignored safety issues for the sake of growth. Congress is constantly demanding answers from the company on both fronts. At the same time, some critics, including conservatives, say Facebook over-policed the platform’s speech and stifled their voices. Other critics, including those on the left side of the aisle, claim Facebook allows the spread of misinformation.

US whistleblower and former Facebook engineer Frances Haugen gives a testimony on the negative impact of big tech companies products on users, at the European Parliament in Brussels, on November 8, 2021. - Facebook whistleblower Frances Haugen urged the EU to remain steadfast against big tech on November 8, boosting European efforts for new laws against US giants. The former Facebook engineer leaked a trove of internal documents that have sparked weeks of criticism of the social media giant. She met with key lawmakers in Brussels responsible for pushing through major legislation that could force the world's biggest tech firms to rethink the way they do business. (Photo by JOHN THYS / AFP) (Photo by JOHN THYS/AFP via Getty Images)

US whistleblower and former Facebook engineer Frances Haugen gives a testimony on the negative impact of big tech companies products on users, at the European Parliament in Brussels, on November 8, 2021.(Photo by JOHN THYS / AFP) (Photo by JOHN THYS/AFP via Getty Images)

What is especially interesting about the Company Formerly Known as Facebook is just how many and varied the reasons people dislike it. It received 50{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} more votes than the second-place finisher, Chinese e-commerce giant Alibaba, not for one singular offense but for a litany of grievances from groups of people that may have little else to agree about.

There were significant complaints of censorship, mainly of the right and conservative voices that felt that the “free-speech police” was being unfair and they were owed the right to say whatever they wanted to on the platform.

On the other side, people hectored the platform for failing to police significant misinformation that in the view of critics contributed to people not taking the pandemic’s potential for death seriously (797,877 official deaths in the U.S. and counting). Facebook was also blamed for the rise of far-right extremism and “undermining democracy worldwide,” as one respondent put it.

Outside of the political conversation, many respondents were upset with the company’s effects on children and young people, citing its photo-sharing site Instagram and its effects on mental health, after internal documents revealed the company knew Instagram made teenage girls feel worse about body image issues but didn’t address the problem.

Facebook/Meta Platforms did not respond to a request for comment.

Can the company redeem itself?

Around 30{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} of Yahoo Finance readers who responded to the survey said that Facebook or Meta could redeem itself.

One respondent said Facebook could redeem itself by acknowledging and apologizing for what it did and donating a “sizable amount” of its profits for a foundation to help reverse its harm. While some people saw the Meta rebrand as a cynical attempt to change the conversation, following Don Draper’s advice in scandal, others were excited by the potential of a new direction that could a) be interesting and b) something different from the aging social media model.

A significant amount of responses focused on executives and founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg. Zuckerberg has certainly never been Mr. Popular, which Aaron Sorkin and David Fincher decided was the reason he created “The Facebook,” in the movie “The Social Network.” But he has long been seen as a visionary with an uncanny knack at predicting (or manifesting) the future, making it unlikely he departs from the company he founded, shaped, and pivoted.

One way it could redeem itself, for the angry investors in the survey, would be to grow its stock price, apparently. The stock is up 22{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} year-to-date — strong, but lagging the S&P 500— but down around 13{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} from its September high.

Zuckerberg and co. have their challenges cut out for them in 2022. Fortunately for them, they’re already reinventing the company.

The (dis)honorable mentions

The annual airing of grievances saw a few companies get special mention from Yahoo Finance readers.

  • Alibaba’s (BABA) almost 50{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} drop year-to-date earned it the number two spot. Investors are upset at having lost money.

  • AT&T’s (T) loss of 24{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} year-to-date as the S&P 500 saw a 24{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} increase. Like Alibaba, this is a story of share price dissatisfaction.

  • Nikola (NKLA) and its many issues last year, with a short seller claiming it was a fraud.

  • Tesla (TSLA) stock has soared, but people are furious with the company rolling out products before they are ready, sexual harrassment scandals, and the general cult of personality surrounding 2021’s Time Person of the Year.

  • Market-maker Citadel Securities and retail trading platform Robinhood (HOOD) had their time in the doghouse during the Gamestock hubbub almost a year ago, and many have not forgotten — and continue to see these players as icing out ordinary retail investors they purport to help.

This was an open-ended survey performed on Survey Monkey via the Yahoo Finance home page from Dec. 4 to Dec,. 5. 1,541 people responded.

Ethan Wolff-Mann is a Senior Writer and Chief of Staff at Yahoo Finance. When he is reporting, he focuses on investing, consumer issues, and personal finance. Follow him on Twitter @ewolffmann.

Follow Yahoo Finance on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, Flipboard, LinkedIn, YouTube, and reddit

The hottest housing market of 2021

The U.S. housing market has been “bonkers” and is “still nuts” — words recently used by real estate guru Barbara Corcoran on Yahoo Finance Live. Since COVID-19 emerged, homes are being sold at a record clip and prices are skyrocketing across the nation. But the frenzy is especially magnified in one Sunbelt City.

Austin is this year’s Yahoo Finance 2021 hottest housing market. According to almost every real estate company that tracks home prices, no matter how you slice and dice the data, home prices in the capital city of Texas have soared, outpacing the nation. 

It’s also probably not much of a surprise to industry watchers and at least one real estate company. Zillow predicted Austin would be the hottest city of 2021 way back in January. Now Zillow (Z) is predicting by the end of this year the Austin metropolitan area will become the least affordable major metro region for homebuyers outside of California; it has already surpassed Boston, Miami, and New York City.

“The Austin market has stood out and it’s because of the phenomenal shift in remote work, outperformance of tech industry and search for affordability,” said Danielle Hale, economist at Realtor.com, adding that even though prices have risen in the market it’s still half as expensive as other major cities.

Median sales price of single-family homes in the Austin metro area rose 33.5{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} to $498,400 in the third quarter of 2021 from the same period a year ago, far outpacing the national median home price increase of 16{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} for the same time period, according to the National Association of Realtors (NAR). Among the 50 major cities that Realtor.com tracks, Austin led the pack in terms of annual median listing price growth by posting a 15.9{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} increase. Similarly, NerdWallet found that among the nation’s largest metro areas, Austin saw the highest increase in listing price — a 29{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} rise in the third quarter from the same period last year.

Austin is “well positioned as a fairly affordable destination to buy a family-sized home in a location that has a lot of cultural cache,” said Jeff Tucker, Zillow’s senior economist.

‘A cool city’

Like many other warmer climate metros, Austin benefited from the COVID migration. But some would argue folks from all around the nation and even world were already flocking to the City of the Violet Crown (Austin shares this moniker with Athens, Greece) well before the virus arrived in the U.S., and not just for South by Southwest (SXSW), an annual interactive media and music festival.

“Austin was popular before COVID, it is a cool city,” said Elizabeth Renter, NerdWallet’s data analyst. “It would be topping the list of price increases and inventory decreases regardless of COVID, maybe not to this extreme.”

While most people arriving in Austin came from Los Angeles, San Jose, and San Francisco in 2020, according to a Zillow analysis, Tucker noted that the city is “a sweet spot, it attracts a lot of people from all over (migration from the West Coast, Northwest and Midwest).” Other U.S. cities like Miami tend to only be destinations for Northeast and Midwest residents, and Boise catches the eye of mostly Californians.

“Austin is a very progressive city that offers everything from not just a scenic perspective: rolling hills, great lakes. It has a very active lifestyle, it’s a tech-centric city,” said Romeo Manzanilla, former president for Austin Board of Realtors and managing director for Compass. “People from the East and West Coasts can identify with it.”

Austin Texas aerial drone of capital city of Texas - Austin texas panoramic panorama aerial drone sunrise golden colors across colorful skyline cityscape

Austin is “a cool city” that attracts homebuyers from both coasts and even outside of the U.S. Credit: Getty

It is home to billionaire and newly anointed Time Person of the Year, Elon Musk, who officially moved Tesla’s (TSLA) headquarters from California this year. Similarly, software maker Oracle (ORCL) has decamped to Austin, where it opened a campus in 2018, from Silicon Valley. And just last month, Samsung said it plans to build a $17 billion semiconductor factory right outside of Austin that is expected to be operational in the second half of 2024.

Meanwhile, next year Apple (AAPL) is expected to complete its $1 billion, 133-acre campus, which will eventually house 15,000 employees in Austin. And since establishing its first office in Austin in 2007, Google (GOOG, GOOGL) has expanded its office space in the city and now has 1,100 employees there. The latest spate of activity has essentially revived Silicon Hills, a nickname given to Austin in the 1990s

“Companies relocating to or expanding secondary headquarters in Austin have created substantial job opportunities and drawn people in. The combination of a strong local economy with the flexibility that people don’t have to have a job in Austin” to live there has made the market a standout, said Hale.

Job growth in Austin has been happening “for many years,” said Lawrence Yun, chief economist at the National Association of Realtors, in an email. “Based on the migration patterns of many Californians moving in, one can surmise it is due to tech sector expansion in the metro region.”

During the third quarter of 2021, 54{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} of people looking for homes in Austin were from outside of Texas including home hunters from overseas, according to Hale. Forty-six percent came from other parts of the state.

It also helps that Austin is in a “tax-friendly state (there’s no income tax) so it’s more beneficial for high-income taxpayers,” she added.

People from the Bay Area and Los Angeles “have more liquid funds to come in and put in an offer [on a home] well above asking [price],” said Manzanilla. “They have made our market competitive.”

Even before the onset of COVID in February 2020, the median home sales price in Austin was $325,000, far cheaper than a home in San Francisco, where the median sales price was $1.4 million, according to Daryl Fairweather, chief economist at Redfin. Still, that was more expensive than the national median home sales price of $302,000.

“It has been a frustrating experience for long-time local residents. Trying to outbid new tech employees has been difficult,” said Yun. “Any monthly savings accumulated for a down payment has become irrelevant as home prices rose even faster than the savings rate.”

But relief may be on the way, as experts note that there are early signs that the Austin housing market is cooling down. In fact, Fairweather said price growth has already peaked this year in April. Like the rest of the nation, price growth will subside to single-digit rates going into 2022, compared to as much as north of 20{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}, according to Fairweather.

The number of homes for sale in Austin is also on the rise. According to NerdWallet, the number of homes listed for sale in Austin rose 73{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} in the third quarter of 2021 from the prior quarter, leading the largest metros in the nation in terms of inventory growth.

That should help alleviate price pressure in the city, even as homes on the market fly off the shelf. During the third quarter of 2021, homes for sale were on the market for a mere 24 days, compared to 40 days nationally, according to NerdWallet’s Renter.

Celebrity and Austin native Matthew McConaughey, who as a minority stakeholder in the MLS team Austin FC helped the city welcome its first professional sports team this year, summed up why the Austin is so hot in an extensive interview with Yahoo Finance Editor-in-chief Andy Serwer last year: “Austin used to be a college town, a government town, and a music town. It’s now a banker town, a tech town, and an international destination.”

Amanda Fung is an editor at Yahoo Finance.

Read the latest financial and business news from Yahoo Finance

Follow Yahoo Finance on Twitter, Instagram, YouTube, Facebook, Flipboard, and LinkedIn

Business News for Wednesday, Dec. 15, 2021

Jerome H. Powell, the chair of the Federal Reserve, suggested on Wednesday that the economy could achieve the central bank’s full-employment goal by next year, a development that could presage raising interest rates from their rock-bottom levels.

Mr. Powell emphasized that a broad range of economic indicators, including unemployment, job openings, wages and other metrics, suggest the labor market is healing quickly, creating more room for the central bank to remove its economic support.

“In my view, we are making rapid progress toward maximum employment,” Mr. Powell said.

Mr. Powell said that the unemployment rate, which was 4.2 percent in November, has been dropping quickly. He said that the labor force participation rate had been “disappointing,” even as vaccinations increased and schools reopened, and that it now seemed likely that a return to a higher participation rate would take some time.

“We’re not going back to the same economy we had in February of 2020,” Mr. Powell said. “The post-pandemic labor market and the economy in general will be different, and the maximum level of employment that’s consistent with price stability evolves over time.”

Inflation is far outstripping the Fed’s target, climbing by 6.8 percent in the year through November, the fastest pace in nearly 40 years. But it has been less clear whether the Fed has accomplished its other economic goal — full employment — meaning that Americans who want to work are able to find jobs.

The unemployment rate is still above the 3.5 percent that prevailed before the pandemic’s onset, but it has been falling quickly. Fresh economic projections released by the Fed on Wednesday show officials expect the jobless rate to fall to 3.5 percent again by the end of next year.

About 4 million jobs are still missing compared with before the pandemic, complicating the Fed’s job when it comes to assessing whether it has met its dual goals of keeping prices stable and the job market strong.

The question has been whether and when missing workers will come back and if policymakers feel the need to leave interest rates low until they do. The virus has complicated that outlook. While many workers have retired, some are reluctant or unable to return for health, child care or other reasons.

Mr. Powell said it would likely take time, and the retreat of the pandemic, for those people to come back into the work force, and that inflation would likely need to remain in check in the meantime to allow for a long period of economic growth.

“One of the two big threats to getting back to maximum employment is actually high inflation,” he said. “Because to get back to where we were, the evidence grows that it’s going to take some time.”

Fed officials have said that they wanted to achieve inflation sustainably above 2 percent — which has been more than accomplished, several have signaled — and full employment before raising interest rates. The economic projections released by the Fed on Wednesday suggested that officials expected to make three interest rate increases next year.

Mr. Powell previously said that the Fed’s two goals have come into tension this year. He has also signaled that the central bank will not allow inflation to rocket out of control.

“We have to balance those two goals when they are in tension as they are right now,” Mr. Powell said in testimony on Dec. 1. “But I assure you we will use our tools to make sure that this high inflation that we are experiencing does not become entrenched.”

In remarks Wednesday, Mr. Powell said that the Fed did have a framework it could use to make decisions about its interest rate when its dual goals of price stability and employment come into conflict. But due to the improvement in the labor market, the Fed would not necessarily have to use it.

Zacks: Analysts Anticipate Prudential Financial, Inc. (NYSE:PRU) Will Post Quarterly Sales of $13.39 Billion

Analysts forecast that Prudential Financial, Inc. (NYSE:PRU) will announce sales of $13.39 billion for the current fiscal quarter, according to Zacks Investment Research. Two analysts have made estimates for Prudential Financial’s earnings, with the highest sales estimate coming in at $13.40 billion and the lowest estimate coming in at $13.39 billion. Prudential Financial posted sales of $15.08 billion during the same quarter last year, which would indicate a negative year-over-year growth rate of 11.2{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}. The firm is expected to issue its next earnings report on Thursday, February 3rd.

On average, analysts expect that Prudential Financial will report full year sales of $60.01 billion for the current financial year, with estimates ranging from $59.27 billion to $60.38 billion. For the next financial year, analysts expect that the firm will report sales of $56.32 billion, with estimates ranging from $53.82 billion to $60.60 billion. Zacks Investment Research’s sales averages are an average based on a survey of sell-side research analysts that follow Prudential Financial.

Prudential Financial (NYSE:PRU) last released its quarterly earnings data on Tuesday, November 2nd. The financial services provider reported $3.78 earnings per share for the quarter, beating analysts’ consensus estimates of $2.68 by $1.10. The business had revenue of $19.66 billion during the quarter, compared to analyst estimates of $13.24 billion. Prudential Financial had a net margin of 11.82{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} and a return on equity of 9.33{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}. During the same period last year, the business earned $3.21 EPS.

PRU has been the topic of a number of recent analyst reports. Barclays raised their price target on shares of Prudential Financial from $102.00 to $110.00 and gave the company an “equal weight” rating in a report on Thursday, September 16th. The Goldman Sachs Group initiated coverage on shares of Prudential Financial in a report on Thursday, December 2nd. They set a “neutral” rating and a $115.00 price target on the stock. Morgan Stanley raised their price target on shares of Prudential Financial from $110.00 to $112.00 and gave the company an “equal weight” rating in a report on Thursday, November 18th. Finally, Royal Bank of Canada raised their price target on shares of Prudential Financial from $112.00 to $119.00 and gave the company a “sector perform” rating in a report on Thursday, November 4th. Seven research analysts have rated the stock with a hold rating and two have issued a buy rating to the stock. Based on data from MarketBeat, Prudential Financial currently has an average rating of “Hold” and an average price target of $107.18.

(Ad)

This could be the most profitable event in crypto history. And it only happens once. If you miss it, there are no second chances.

In other Prudential Financial news, CEO Charles F. Lowrey sold 37,011 shares of Prudential Financial stock in a transaction that occurred on Friday, October 8th. The shares were sold at an average price of $110.00, for a total transaction of $4,071,210.00. The sale was disclosed in a filing with the SEC, which is accessible through this link. Also, SVP Timothy L. Schmidt sold 3,500 shares of Prudential Financial stock in a transaction that occurred on Tuesday, November 16th. The shares were sold at an average price of $112.26, for a total transaction of $392,910.00. The disclosure for this sale can be found here. 0.33{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} of the stock is owned by insiders.

Institutional investors have recently added to or reduced their stakes in the company. Nordea Investment Management AB increased its position in Prudential Financial by 103.8{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} in the third quarter. Nordea Investment Management AB now owns 4,485,930 shares of the financial services provider’s stock worth $477,078,000 after purchasing an additional 2,284,632 shares during the last quarter. Royal Bank of Canada increased its position in Prudential Financial by 255.5{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} in the second quarter. Royal Bank of Canada now owns 2,908,712 shares of the financial services provider’s stock worth $298,055,000 after purchasing an additional 2,090,578 shares during the last quarter. Amundi bought a new stake in Prudential Financial in the second quarter worth $206,722,000. Bank of New York Mellon Corp increased its position in Prudential Financial by 20.9{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} in the second quarter. Bank of New York Mellon Corp now owns 3,492,504 shares of the financial services provider’s stock worth $357,876,000 after purchasing an additional 603,664 shares during the last quarter. Finally, Invesco Ltd. increased its position in Prudential Financial by 24.1{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} in the third quarter. Invesco Ltd. now owns 3,081,505 shares of the financial services provider’s stock worth $324,174,000 after purchasing an additional 597,615 shares during the last quarter. Hedge funds and other institutional investors own 56.14{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} of the company’s stock.

NYSE:PRU opened at $106.93 on Thursday. The firm has a 50-day simple moving average of $109.04 and a two-hundred day simple moving average of $105.49. The company has a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.30, a quick ratio of 0.06 and a current ratio of 0.06. The firm has a market cap of $40.42 billion, a P/E ratio of 5.84, a P/E/G ratio of 0.79 and a beta of 1.63. Prudential Financial has a fifty-two week low of $74.58 and a fifty-two week high of $115.52.

Prudential Financial declared that its Board of Directors has authorized a stock repurchase plan on Tuesday, November 9th that permits the company to buyback $1.50 billion in outstanding shares. This buyback authorization permits the financial services provider to reacquire up to 3.6{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} of its shares through open market purchases. Shares buyback plans are typically a sign that the company’s board of directors believes its shares are undervalued.

The firm also recently disclosed a quarterly dividend, which will be paid on Thursday, December 16th. Investors of record on Tuesday, November 23rd will be issued a $1.15 dividend. This represents a $4.60 dividend on an annualized basis and a dividend yield of 4.30{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}. The ex-dividend date of this dividend is Monday, November 22nd. Prudential Financial’s payout ratio is 25.12{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}.

About Prudential Financial

Prudential Financial, Inc engages in the provision of financial products and services including life insurance, annuities, mutual funds, and investment management to both individual and institutional customers. It operates through the following segments: PGIM, International Businesses, Retirement, Group Insurance, Individual Annuities, Individual Life, Assurance IQ, Closed Block, and Corporate and Others.

Recommended Story: Diluted Earnings Per Share

Get a free copy of the Zacks research report on Prudential Financial (PRU)

For more information about research offerings from Zacks Investment Research, visit Zacks.com

Earnings History and Estimates for Prudential Financial (NYSE:PRU)

This instant news alert was generated by narrative science technology and financial data from MarketBeat in order to provide readers with the fastest and most accurate reporting. This story was reviewed by MarketBeat’s editorial team prior to publication. Please send any questions or comments about this story to [email protected]

Should you invest $1,000 in Prudential Financial right now?

Before you consider Prudential Financial, you’ll want to hear this.

MarketBeat keeps track of Wall Street’s top-rated and best performing research analysts and the stocks they recommend to their clients on a daily basis. MarketBeat has identified the five stocks that top analysts are quietly whispering to their clients to buy now before the broader market catches on… and Prudential Financial wasn’t on the list.

While Prudential Financial currently has a “Hold” rating among analysts, top-rated analysts believe these five stocks are better buys.

View The 5 Stocks Here

 

SeaChange Reports Fiscal Third Quarter 2022 Financial and Operational Results

  • Continued Operating Momentum, with Revenues Up 9{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} Sequentially and 44{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} Year-over-Year

  • Signed Multi-Million-Dollar Contract Renewal with Major U.S. Multiple-System-Operator

  • Re-alignment in Progress, with Continued Execution on Core Competencies in Video & Advertising, Shifting More Resources to Streaming Products

BOSTON, Dec. 14, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — SeaChange International, Inc. (NASDAQ: SEAC), a leading provider of video delivery, advertising, and emerging streaming platforms, today reported financial and operational results for the fiscal third quarter ended October 31, 2021.

Fiscal Third Quarter 2022 and Recent Highlights

  • Secured multi-million-dollar contract renewal with one of the largest multiple-system-operators in the United States, demonstrating ability to successfully monetize long-term relationships.

  • Appointed veteran TMT executive Peter D. Aquino as President and CEO, solidifying senior leadership team, and initiating strategic initiatives.

  • Generated 9{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} sequential revenue growth and 44{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} year-over-year, driven primarily by signed renewals, and upsells from existing customers.

  • Decreased operating expenses by 14{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} sequentially substantially due to ongoing efficiency measures and approaching break-even and company profitability objectives.

  • Ended quarter with solid balance sheet, including $17.6 million in cash and cash equivalents and no debt.

Management Commentary

“Our financial results in the third quarter demonstrate our continued commitment to our multi-pronged strategy towards revenue growth, increased profitability, and strategic objectives,” said SeaChange’s President and Chief Executive Officer, Peter D. Aquino. “My first 90 days included a deep dive into the operations, management objectives, and growth products that we are ‘leaning’ into to accelerate our transformation and provide customers with leading-edge software to drive their streaming services. I am very excited about our upside to play a leading role in enabling our customers to capture this new demand.”

Chris Klimmer, Senior Vice President and Chief Revenue Officer at SeaChange, commented: “SeaChange operates in massive markets with large and growing total addressable markets (TAMs) where we are leveraging our deep expertise, strong relationships and long operating history to capitalize on these opportunities. Our pipeline is growing, and we are encouraged by the progress we are making in each of our core operating markets. We are effectively monetizing longstanding Tier 1 relationships in cable, transitioning companies to high-upside revenue sharing models in advertising, creating new offerings through our streaming platform StreamVid, as well as introducing new innovations to support content monetization on Connected TV platforms through FAST channels, a product initiative that we branded Xstream.”

Aquino added: “SeaChange is in an increasingly strong operating position with $17.6 million in cash and no debt, a lean cost structure and growing revenue. My thorough assessment of our business not only reaffirmed but strengthened my belief that our company’s technology platform has significant value, which we are seeking to maximize through both organic and inorganic growth opportunities. Longer term, we believe our continued execution on our strategic plan will drive scale, capture market share, and create even greater value for both our customers and stockholders.”

Fiscal Third Quarter 2022 Financial Results

  • Total revenue was $7.2 million, compared to $6.5 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2022. Product revenue was $3.5 million (or 49{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} of total revenue), an improvement compared to $2.7 million (or 41{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} of total revenue) in the second quarter of fiscal 2022. Service revenue was $3.6 million (or 51{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} of total revenue) compared to $3.8 million (or 59{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} of total revenue) in the second quarter of fiscal 2022.

  • Gross profit was $3.7 million (or 52{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} of total revenue), compared to $4.1 million (or 63{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} of total revenue) in the second quarter of fiscal 2022.

  • Total non-GAAP operating expenses were $5.1 million, an improvement compared to non-GAAP operating expenses of $5.4 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2022.

  • GAAP loss from operations totaled $2.0 million, an improvement compared to a GAAP loss from operations of $2.5 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2022.

  • GAAP net loss totaled $2.1 million, or $(0.04) per basic share, a decrease from GAAP net income of $0.2 million, or $0.00 per fully diluted share, in the second quarter of fiscal 2022.

  • Non-GAAP loss from operations totaled $1.4 million, or $(0.03) per basic share, compared to non-GAAP loss from operations of $1.3 million, or $(0.03) per basic share, in the second quarter of fiscal 2022.

  • Ended the quarter with cash and cash equivalents of $17.6 million and no debt.

Conference Call
SeaChange will host a conference call today (December 14, 2021) at 5:00 p.m. Eastern time (2:00 p.m. Pacific time) to discuss these results.

SeaChange executive management will host the call, followed by a question-and-answer period.

U.S. dial-in number: 877-407-8037
International number: 201-689-8037
Meeting Number: 13725442

Please call the conference telephone number approximately 10 minutes prior to the start time. An operator will register your name and organization. If you have any difficulty connecting with the conference call, please contact Gateway Group at 949-574-3860.

The conference call will be broadcast live and available for replay here and via the investor relations section of SeaChange’s website.

About SeaChange International, Inc.
SeaChange International (NASDAQ: SEAC) is a trusted provider of streaming video services, cable TV broadcast platforms and advanced advertising insertion technology. The company partners with operators, broadcasters and content owners worldwide to help them deliver the highest quality video experience to consumers. Its StreamVid premium streaming platform enables operators and content owners to cost-effectively launch and grow a direct-to-consumer service to manage, curate and monetize their content as well as form a direct relationship with their subscribers. SeaChange enjoys a rich heritage of nearly three decades of video hardware, software and advertising technology.

Safe Harbor Provision
Certain statements in this press release may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended to date. Forward-looking statements can be identified by words such as “may,” “might,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “seeks,” “intends,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential” or “continue,” the negative of these terms and other comparable terminology. Examples of forward-looking statements include, among others, statements we make regarding the Company’s ability to grow its revenue pipeline, execute its strategic plan and the benefits of its strategic plan, including driving scale, capturing market share, and creating even greater value for both our customers and stockholders; and other statements that are not purely statements of historical fact. These forward-looking statements are made on the basis of the current beliefs, expectations, and assumptions of the management of the Company and are subject to a number of known and unknown risks and significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from what may be expressed or implied in these forward-looking statements. Risks that could cause actual results to differ include, but are not limited to: the impact of COVID-19 on our business and the economies in which we operate; the continued spending by the Company’s customers on video solutions and services and expenses we may incur in fulfilling customer arrangements; the manner in which the multiscreen video and over-the-top markets develop; the Company’s ability to compete in the software marketplace; the loss of or reduction in demand, or the return of product, by one of the Company’s large customers or the failure of revenue acceptance criteria in a given fiscal quarter; the cancellation or deferral of purchases of the Company’s products; any decline in demand or average selling prices for our products and services; failure to achieve our financial forecasts due to inaccurate sales forecasts or other factors, including due to expenses we may incur in fulfilling customer arrangements; the impact of our cost-savings and restructuring programs; the Company’s ability to manage its growth; the risks associated with international operations; the ability of the Company to use its net operating losses, including the potential impact on these losses resulting from the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act; the impact of changes in the market on the value of our investments; changes in the regulatory environment; and other risks that are described in further detail in the Company’s reports filed from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which are available at the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov, including but not limited to, such information appearing under the caption “Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K. Any forward-looking statements should be considered in light of those risk factors. The Company cautions readers that such forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made. The Company disclaims any intent or obligation to publicly update or revise any such forward-looking statements to reflect any change in Company expectations or future events, conditions or circumstances on which any such forward-looking statements may be based, or that may affect the likelihood that actual results may differ from those set forth in such forward-looking statements.

SeaChange Contact:
Matt Glover and Jeff Grampp, CFA
Gateway Group, Inc.
949-574-3860
SEAC@gatewayir.com

SeaChange International, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited, amounts in thousands)

October 31, 2021

January 31, 2021

Assets

Cash and cash equivalents

$

17,551

$

5,856

Marketable securities

252

Accounts and other receivables, net

5,374

6,050

Unbilled receivables

15,146

15,699

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

2,553

4,372

Property and equipment, net

512

605

Goodwill and intangible assets, net

10,479

11,849

Other assets

2,900

5,725

Total assets

$

54,515

$

50,408

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

Accounts payable and other liabilities

$

6,861

$

10,172

Deferred revenue

3,009

5,394

Deferred tax liabilities and income taxes payable

784

888

Promissory note

2,413

Total liabilities

10,654

18,867

Total stockholders’ equity

43,861

31,541

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

$

54,515

$

50,408

SeaChange International, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except per share data)

For the Three Months
Ended October 31,

For the Nine Months
Ended October 31,

2021

2020

2021

2020

Revenue:

Product

$

3,511

$

1,048

$

7,840

$

5,212

Service

3,640

3,918

10,903

11,664

Total revenue

7,151

4,966

18,743

16,876

Cost of revenue:

Product

1,609

435

2,708

2,803

Service

1,830

1,755

5,375

6,974

Total cost of revenue

3,439

2,190

8,083

9,777

Gross profit

3,712

2,776

10,660

7,099

Operating expenses:

Research and development

2,090

3,024

6,971

10,550

Selling and marketing

1,449

1,636

4,472

5,490

General and administrative

2,110

2,636

6,897

7,057

Severance and restructuring costs

75

53

646

1,082

Total operating expenses

5,724

7,349

18,986

24,179

Loss from operations

(2,012

)

(4,573

)

(8,326

)

(17,080

)

Other expense, net

(67

)

(499

)

(83

)

(334

)

Gain on extinguishment of debt

2,440

Loss before income taxes

(2,079

)

(5,072

)

(5,969

)

(17,414

)

Income tax provision (benefit)

26

45

(23

)

(21

)

Net loss

$

(2,105

)

$

(5,117

)

$

(5,946

)

$

(17,393

)

Net loss per share, basic

$

(0.04

)

$

(0.14

)

$

(0.13

)

$

(0.46

)

Net loss per share, diluted

$

(0.04

)

$

(0.14

)

$

(0.13

)

$

(0.46

)

Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic

49,040

37,556

46,334

37,436

Weighted average common shares outstanding, diluted

49,040

37,556

46,334

37,436

Comprehensive loss:

Net loss

$

(2,105

)

$

(5,117

)

$

(5,946

)

$

(17,393

)

Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax:

Foreign currency translation adjustment

(291

)

(143

)

(649

)

1,498

Unrealized (losses) gains on marketable securities

(33

)

1

(37

)

Total other comprehensive (loss) income

(291

)

(176

)

(648

)

1,461

Comprehensive loss

$

(2,396

)

$

(5,293

)

$

(6,594

)

$

(15,932

)

SeaChange International, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited, amounts in thousands)

For the Nine Months Ended October 31,

2021

2020

Cash flows from operating activities:

Net loss

$

(5,946

)

$

(17,393

)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:

Depreciation and amortization expense

1,098

1,105

Loss on disposal of fixed assets

75

Gain on write-off of operating lease right-of-use assets and liabilities
related to termination

(328

)

Gain on extinguishment of debt

(2,440

)

Recovery of bad debts

(135

)

(216

)

Stock-based compensation expense

1,315

1,054

Deferred income taxes

246

Realized and unrealized foreign currency transaction loss

399

1,498

Other

1

(26

)

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

Accounts receivable

709

7,084

Unbilled receivables

397

4,274

Prepaid expenses and other current assets and other assets

2,007

539

Accounts payable

(93

)

(1,242

)

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

(230

)

(3,886

)

Deferred revenue

(2,329

)

(2,358

)

Net cash used in operating activities

(5,500

)

(9,321

)

Cash flows from investing activities:

Purchases of property and equipment

(78

)

(311

)

Proceeds from sales and maturities of marketable securities

252

3,576

Net cash provided by investing activities

174

3,265

Cash flows from financing activities:

Proceeds from stock option exercises

137

119

Proceeds from employee stock purchase plan

18

Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs

17,462

Repurchases of common stock

(80

)

Proceeds from the Paycheck Protection Program

2,413

Net cash provided by financing activities

17,599

2,470

Effect of exchange rate on cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash

(467

)

(587

)

Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash

11,806

(4,173

)

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period

6,084

9,297

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period

$

17,890

$

5,124

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information

Income taxes paid

$

132

$

196

Non-cash activities:

Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations

$

$

987

Purchases of property and equipment included in accounts payable

$

72

$

Non-GAAP Measures
We define non-GAAP loss from operations as U.S. GAAP net loss plus stock-based compensation expenses, amortization of intangible assets, severance and restructuring costs, gain on extinguishment of debt, other expense, net, and income tax (provision) benefit. We discuss non-GAAP loss from operations, including on a per share basis, in our quarterly earnings releases and certain other communications, as we believe non-GAAP operating loss from operations is an important measure that is not calculated according to U.S. GAAP. We use non-GAAP loss from operations in internal forecasts and models when establishing internal operating budgets, supplementing the financial results and forecasts reported to our Board of Directors, determining a component of bonus compensation for executive officers and other key employees based on operating performance, and evaluating short-term and long-term operating trends in our operations. We believe that the non-GAAP loss from operations financial measure assists in providing an enhanced understanding of our underlying operational measures to manage the business, to evaluate performance compared to prior periods and the marketplace, and to establish operational goals. We believe that the non-GAAP financial adjustments are useful to investors because they allow investors to evaluate the effectiveness of the methodology and information used by management in our financial and operational decision-making.

Non-GAAP loss from operations is a non-GAAP financial measure and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for financial information provided in accordance with U.S. GAAP. This non-GAAP financial measure may not be computed in the same manner as similarly titled measures used by other companies. We expect to continue to incur expenses similar to the financial adjustments described above in arriving at non-GAAP loss from operations and investors should not infer from our presentation of this non-GAAP financial measure that these costs are unusual, infrequent or non-recurring. The following table includes the reconciliations of our U.S. GAAP loss from operations, the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP financial measure, to our non-GAAP loss from operations for the three and nine months ended October 31, 2021.

SeaChange International, Inc.
Fiscal Year Reconciliation of GAAP to Non-GAAP
(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except per share data)

For the Three Months
Ended October 31,

For the Nine Months
Ended October 31,

2021

2020

2021

2020

(Amounts in thousands)

(Amounts in thousands)

GAAP net loss

$

(2,105

)

$

(5,117

)

$

(5,946

)

$

(17,393

)

Other expense, net

(67

)

(499

)

(83

)

(334

)

Gain on extinguishment of debt

2,440

Income tax (provision) benefit

(26

)

(45

)

23

21

GAAP loss from operations

$

(2,012

)

$

(4,573

)

$

(8,326

)

$

(17,080

)

Amortization of intangible assets

304

308

930

891

Stock-based compensation

274

437

1,315

1,054

Severance and restructuring costs

75

53

646

1,082

Non-GAAP loss from operations

$

(1,359

)

$

(3,775

)

$

(5,435

)

$

(14,053

)

Non-GAAP loss from operations, basic per share

(0.03

)

(0.10

)

(0.12

)

(0.38

)

Non-GAAP loss from operations, diluted per share

(0.03

)

(0.10

)

(0.12

)

(0.38

)

Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic per share

49,040

37,556

46,334

37,436

Weighted average common shares outstanding, diluted per share

49,040

37,556

46,334

37,436

SeaChange International, Inc.
Supplemental Schedule – Revenue Breakout
(Unaudited, amounts in thousands)

Three Months Ended October 31,

Nine Months Ended October 31,

2021

2020

2021

2020

(Amounts in thousands)

(Amounts in thousands)

Product revenue:

License and subscription

$

2,172

$

994

$

6,306

$

3,739

Hardware

1,339

54

1,534

1,473

Total product revenue

3,511

1,048

7,840

5,212

Service revenue:

Maintenance and support

3,003

3,430

9,207

10,552

Professional services and other

637

488

1,696

1,112

Total service revenue

3,640

3,918

10,903

11,664

Total revenue

$

7,151

$

4,966

$

18,743

$

16,876