Tag: fees

Posted on

Indian regulator plans to allow mutual funds with performance-based fees

Indian regulator plans to allow mutual funds with performance-based fees

April 21 (Reuters) – India’s market regulator is scheduling to allow a new class of mutual fund schemes in which asset managers’ rates will partly be connected to functionality, according to an official document reviewed by Reuters and a supply instantly acquainted with the subject.

As element of the proposal, the Securities and Trade Board of India (SEBI) wants to permit extra fees if a fund constantly outperforms a relevant benchmark index and offers higher annualised returns, according to an interior SEBI document.

The proposal to introduce functionality-linked rates on pick mutual fund schemes has not been previously claimed. According to the system, the base charges at this time charged for mutual money would be diminished and additional rates would be centered on effectiveness.

If released, India would be a single of a handful of key marketplaces to introduce overall performance-connected expenses for mutual funds.

“The regulator is contemplating this proposal considering that it has observed that many actively managed cash fail to conquer their benchmark index,” mentioned a human being with immediate expertise of the make any difference, declining to be named considering the fact that he was not authorised to talk to the media.

“An possibility for additional rates could act as an incentive for money to give much better returns,” the resource reported. Earlier functionality will be applied to judge no matter if a fund has executed superior than the decided on benchmark.

There was no response from SEBI to a request for remark.

The proposal has been referred to SEBI’s mutual fund panel to do the job out implementation, explained the supply.

Ordinarily, these proposals are sent to internal panels for deliberation, next which community comments is sought and a ultimate conclusion taken by SEBI thereafter.

The proposed improvements are portion of a comprehensive assessment of charges that India’s 39.46 trillion rupee ($480.26 billion) asset management business presently fees from its investors. There is a need to have for transparency on charges levied by mutual cash, SEBI chairperson Madhabi Puri Buch stated on March 28.

At present, Indian Asset Management Firms are permitted to levy prices referred to as Whole Expenditure Ratio, which variety from -2.25{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} of the expenditure sum. The cost features the total fees connected for taking care of the fund.

To get much more investors to devote in mutual fund strategies from India’s tier-2 and tier-3 metropolitan areas, the regulator also permits fund homes to cost extra service fees for advertising and marketing and to incentivise intermediaries.

On the other hand, throughout inspections of India’s 44 asset professionals, SEBI uncovered circumstances of malpractices, together with incentive expenses on the exact same trader by various money, according to the doc cited previously.

To suppress this, SEBI will only permit resources to cost extra costs if an investor is getting any mutual fund for the very first time, the document showed.

($1 = 82.1630 Indian rupees)

Reporting by Jayshree P Upadhyay Enhancing by Raju Gopalakrishnan

Our Benchmarks: The Thomson Reuters Rely on Principles.

Posted on

Planswell Drops Fees For Financial Planning Software

Financial planning software developer Planswell is changing its revenue model and will give its planning technology to advisors for free, the firm announced. It will focus instead on driving revenue through selling advisors business-building services, including marketing automation and lead generation tools, according to CEO Eric Arnold. 

Planswell’s planning software had cost advisors as much as $199 a month, Arnold said. 

The firm currently has about 1,000 paying advisors using the service, according to Arnold, meaning the move will cost the 40-person firm $2.4 million in revenue, assuming a 100{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} annual renewal rate and no discounting. But Arnold said he is confident that giving away planning for free will increase the number of advisors who will want to use the firm’s costlier business development tools, which start at $450 a month.

The decision has caused consternation in his finance department, Arnold said, but he is convinced the path towards growth involves free financial planning.

Planswell isn’t the first financial software developer to offer free financial planning tools to lure users into paying for other services. Robo advisor Wealthfront started giving away financial planning in 2018. Personal Capital provides free financial planning, including savings and retirement planning, to more than 3.1 million individuals. Of those individuals, more than 30,000 families have converted into paying customers for wealth management services, according to a company spokesperson. Personal Capital was purchased by Empower Retirement, a subsidiary of Montreal-based Power Corporation, in 2020.

For its part, Planswell has created 400,000 financial plans, according to Arnold. The plans, which many advisors use as a lead-generation tool to find clients looking for insurance or more robust investment management, take an average of three minutes for each client to create. The user-led plans can be completed on a desktop or via a mobile device and advisors have the option of using video conferencing to interact with the prospects. More than 66{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} of its advisor clients are based in the U.S.

But Arnold said the firm was not giving up on its core financial planning software. Because Planswell also does direct-to-consumer planning, it generates its own leads and is able to sell those to advisors.

“We’ve spent millions of dollars building [Planswell’s financial planning software],” said Arnold. “We will continue to invest millions of dollars to make it continue to be the best user experience—and hopefully in the future it’ll be the absolute best in every possible comparable way to other planning software companies.”

Future iterations will include decumulation planning for user accounts and estate planning, as well as expanding to markets beyond Canada and the U.S., said Arnold. The firm will have to do that without the revenue from its core planning tool.

The move comes just a little over a year since Planswell expanded into the U.S. which comes with its own risks, according to at least one other financial planning executive who moved into the U.S. market after launching in Canada.

“In the American space, there’s a lot more players and a lot more things going on all the time,” said Shawn Brayman, founder, president and CEO of Toronto-based financial planning developer PlanPlus, which was acquired by Morningstar last year. “Getting mind share is hard.”

If advisor clients feel like their vendor is just there for a quick buck and not willing to invest in the business of that particular geography, advisors may not be willing to take a chance on a new software vendor. On the other hand, providing a free service can be enticing for the right client, he added.

Arnold refuted the notion that the move means the firm is abandoning planning to become a marketing-tech firm for advisors. “The mission has never changed,” he said. “We want to put actual financial plans in everyone’s hands, for free. We want to spread that around the world.”

Posted on

Financial watchdog cracks down on bank overdraft fees

Rohit Chopra, director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

Alex Edelman/Bloomberg via Getty Images

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is cracking down on banks charging fees for customers who overdraw their checking accounts, the bureau announced Wednesday.

The financial watchdog is planning a “range of regulatory interventions” targeting firms that rely heavily on overdraft fees as a revenue source, Rohit Chopra, director of the CFPB, said in a press call.

Overdrafts occur when customers don’t have enough funds in their accounts to cover a transaction. Banks may allow the transaction to proceed, but charge a fee to cover the cost.

Charging for overdrafts and non-sufficient funds is a big money maker for banks, and has continued during the Covid-19 pandemic, Chopra said. Banks earned more than $15 billion from such charges in 2019, a figure that has risen steadily, according to the bureau.

More from Personal Finance:
Must-know changes for the upcoming tax season
More than half of employers to require Covid vaccines as omicron fears grow
Why Social Security retirement claims haven’t surged amid Covid-19

The fees, typically around $34 for each overdraft, largely impact families who can least afford them, Chopra said.

“Banks, especially big banks, continue to rely on overdraft and [non-sufficient funds] fees as a major source of revenue,” Chopra said. “Rather than competing on transparent upfront pricing, large financial institutions are still hooked on exploitative junk fees that can quickly drain a family’s bank account.”

The CFPB, a federal agency created by the Dodd-Frank financial reform law in the aftermath of the Great Recession, will increase its oversight of banks “heavily dependent” on overdraft fees, according to the Wednesday announcement.

Officials didn’t quantify what constitutes heavy reliance on overdraft fees. The agency will tell firms how they measure against peers, Chopra said.

The market won’t solve this on its own.

Rohit Chopra

director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

The agency’s oversight will come via additional supervisory and enforcement scrutiny, according to the bureau.

The agency will take action against large banks with overdraft practices that violate the law, and officials will prioritize examinations of banks heavily reliant on overdrafts, Chopra said.

Officials declined to outline whether it will take additional steps to curb the practice.

Banks continued to charge overdraft fees during the Covid-19 pandemic, and shareholders enjoy a predictable, steady revenue stream from them, Chopra said.

Three banks — JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo and Bank of America — accounted for about $5 billion of total overdraft fees collected in 2019, representing 44{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} of the fees collected by banks with over $1 billion in assets, according to the CFPB.

Of course, not all banks charge customers for overdrafts. For example, Ally Bank, an online bank, got rid of overdraft fees earlier this year. And other firms, including PNC Bank and Bank of America, have made it tougher for customers to overdraw their accounts.

Capital One said Wednesday that it is eliminating all overdraft fees for retail banking customers starting in 2022. It’s the largest U.S. bank yet to end the industry practice. The bank expects to lose $150 million in annual revenue as a result.

Chopra said he’s not expecting other banks to follow in the near term.

“The market won’t solve this on its own,” Chopra said. “We have a clear market failure here,” he added.

A small share of households account for the bulk of overdraft revenue. About 9{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} of consumer accounts pay 10 or more overdrafts per year, accounting for close to 80{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} of all overdraft revenue, according to the CFPB.

The bureau will also “harness technology” to make it easier for customers to change banks, a difficult task due to the need to update information like automatic debits with many sources, Chopra said. He advocated for an “open banking infrastructure” in the future to make this easier, but didn’t detail how or when this might come to fruition.

(Correction: The market share of overdraft revenue for three large banks was misstated by the CFPB in an earlier version of this story. The agency has since amended the figures.)