Emerging markets: all risk and few rewards?

Emerging markets: all risk and few rewards?

The difference between the pace of growth in developing and advanced economies is set to narrow to its lowest level this century. For emerging markets seeking investors, that is a problem: the point of investing in a developing economy is that it offers markedly quicker growth than developed ones. Without that, the money will go elsewhere.

Emerging market assets traditionally have greater yields than those available in rich countries for two reasons. One is that their economies are growing faster. The other is that they are riskier.

“Without growth, it’s just [all] risk,” says David Lubin, head of emerging market economics at the American bank Citi.

The case for investing in emerging market stocks and bonds has rarely been weaker — something the IMF data on growth rates reinforces. The coronavirus pandemic is ongoing, often in places where vaccination rates are stubbornly low, and economies have been weighed down by debts incurred to help cope with its impact on public health and businesses.

You are seeing a snapshot of an interactive graphic. This is most likely due to being offline or JavaScript being disabled in your browser.


Higher interest rates in the US and a stronger dollar are looming on the horizon, making those debts harder to service and defaults more likely. And across large parts of the developing world, inflation has risen alarmingly, forcing policymakers to raise interest rates aggressively to avoid a spiral into the hyperinflation that has plagued many of these countries in the past. When coupled with stuttering global trade it paints a gloomy picture.

The biggest immediate example of such risk is Sri Lanka. Stricken by the hit to its tourism sector during the pandemic, the country has almost $7bn in interest and debt payments due this year, but less than $3bn in foreign reserves.

Although the government believes it can weather the crisis as tourists return and exports pick up, it has also sought relief from creditors such as India and China, which has funded infrastructure projects such as the Hambantota port and Colombo Port City. Even so, many bondholders now see a default as inevitable.

A woman displays her utility bills during a protest against high energy prices in Istanbul, Turkey on February 9,
Fitch Ratings, a credit agency, issued a sovereign downgrade of Turkey last week © Umit Bektas/Reuters

Larger emerging economies appear to be in less immediate danger. But Ed Parker, head of global sovereign research at Fitch Ratings, a credit-rating agency, talks of “a long tail of weak, fragile frontier markets” that look to be at risk.

Investors are particularly concerned about countries such as Ghana, El Salvador and Tunisia — not to mention Ukraine, should Russia invade. “This is not an abstract concept,” warns Parker. “Given the pandemic, many of them are much less able to withstand the shocks that could hit them this year.” Six countries have already defaulted during the pandemic: Argentina, Belize, Ecuador, Lebanon, Suriname (twice) and Zambia.

Yet even while larger countries are not at immediate risk of default, many have suffered a deterioration in credit conditions. In 2020, Fitch issued a record 45 sovereign downgrades affecting 27 of the 80 emerging markets for which it prepares ratings, including Mexico and South Africa. It downgraded Turkey last week.

This is bad news, and not only for investors. The influx of foreign capital into emerging markets since the 1980s has contributed to a huge reduction in poverty levels and growth in middle classes globally. If it continues shrinking, the frontier countries with the most potential for growth will suffer as will their populations.

Column chart of Fitch ratings actions on emerging market sovereign debt showing Many developing countries have seen their debt downgraded

“Two years into the pandemic,” says Rebeca Grynspan, secretary-general of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, “the problems [of debt, inflation and slow growth] will only mount.”

Looking for the positives

The outlook is not wholly bleak, say analysts. Many emerging economies are much better placed today to withstand such difficulties than they were in the past. Previously, persistent and deep current account deficits made countries vulnerable to external shocks and dependent on foreign finance.

Now, in aggregate, emerging markets are running a current account surplus. Many, including Brazil, South Africa and India, have substantial reserves of foreign exchange and deep local capital markets, which offer protection from swings in exchange rates and in foreign investors’ appetite for risk.

Construction workers build an express underpass road in Tabatinga, Brazil, last August
Brazil has increased its interest policy rate from 2 per cent in March last year to 10.75 per cent today © Dado Galdieri/Bloomberg

For exporters of commodities and other goods, international prices have moved in their favour. Although big countries from India to Brazil have suffered terribly in the pandemic, many smaller countries, especially in sub-Saharan Africa, have coped far better with the public health and economic consequences of the crisis than first feared. So many foreign investors have retreated from emerging market stocks and bonds that there is little risk of a further sell-off, and prices have fallen low enough to tempt some back in. Some asset managers are even predicting a bumper year ahead — or at least a quiet comeback.

Fixed income investors also have reasons to be cheerful. While the world waits for the US Federal Reserve to begin raising its policy interest rate as soon as March to rein in rapidly rising prices, central banks in many emerging markets are already far ahead of it.

Russia, Brazil and many others began raising interest rates almost a year ago. Not for them the luxury of waiting to see whether rising food and fuel prices would turn out to be temporary or long-lasting. A history of runaway inflation in several of these countries forced policymakers to act quickly.

Employees work on a production line for electric forklifts at the Noblelift Intelligent Equipment factory in Huzhou, eastern China
There is a slowing pace of output growth in China, which will have grave implications for other developing economies © Qilai Shen/Bloomberg

Brazil, for example, has steadily increased its policy rate from 2 per cent in March last year to 10.75 per cent today. It is expected to peak at 12 per cent before being pared back towards the end of this year. Consumer price inflation, running at more than 10 per cent, is expected to fall to 5.5 per cent over the same period.

This combination of high interest rates and relatively low inflation can be a giant magnet for fixed-income investors. The high yields available on hard currency bonds — issued mostly in dollars and euros from smaller emerging markets — already offer tempting annual returns in the high single digits.

For more than a decade, however, interest rates in emerging economies have been falling and their currencies weakening, making local currency bonds less appealing to foreign investors. Now with high domestic interest rates in larger emerging economies, the traditional carry trade — borrowing where rates are low to invest where they are high — could be revived, triggering a long-awaited boom in local-currency bonds.

“If I write one more report saying we are positive on EM local debt, I’ll get fired,” jokes Polina Kurdyavko, head of emerging market debt at BlueBay Asset Management. “It hasn’t worked for 12 or more years — but it could finally work out this time.

You are seeing a snapshot of an interactive graphic. This is most likely due to being offline or JavaScript being disabled in your browser.


“We are at a crunch point,” Kurdyavko adds. “I don’t remember any year like this, where there are so many risk events that could turn into double-digit positive or double-digit negative returns.”

Following the Fed

The key risk event for emerging markets in 2022 is rising US interest rates. “History tells us that when the US has its own inflation problem to deal with, that’s bad for emerging markets,” Lubin says.

US interest rates ticking upwards present two problems. First, they reduce the appeal of investing in emerging market assets, making it harder to attract foreign capital. To put a dent in that appeal, US yields do not have to rise by very much. The inflation-adjusted yield on 10-year US Treasury bonds, which has been negative throughout the pandemic, has risen this year from about minus 1 per cent to minus 0.5 per cent.

That may not seem significant, nor very appealing when compared with the yields available from emerging markets assets. But in markets, Lubin says, direction matters as much as level. Investors seem to agree. With the exception of China, emerging market stocks and bonds suffered as much as $7.7bn in outflows of foreign money in January, according to data from the Institute of International Finance.

Shoppers at the Shell Lumber and Hardware home improvement store in Miami, Florida
US consumer prices jumped 7.5{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} in January compared with 12 months earlier, the steepest increase since 1982 © Joe Raedle/Getty

The second problem with increasing US rates is that they tend to make the dollar rise against other currencies. For developing countries, where currencies are often volatile, this increases the cost of servicing any existing dollar-denominated debts and makes foreign finance expensive, putting a further damper on investment.

It is also bad for trade, which needs investment in logistics and supply chains. There is a growing body of evidence that such costs outweigh any benefits to exporters from their own currencies becoming more competitive against the dollar. In the short term, says Gita Gopinath, chief economist at the IMF, “the extensive use of the US dollar in trade means that export volumes in the selling country do not react much to a depreciation of its currency”.

If inflation is falling thanks to well-executed policy, that’s a good thing. But if it is falling because GDP is slowing, that is decidedly negative. Emerging markets are not just slowing relative to developed ones. In many places, output is plummeting. In Brazil, for example, GDP growth is forecast to fall from 4.7 per cent in 2021 to 0.3 per cent this year, according to a central bank survey of economists.

One cause of the slowdown is debt. Rich countries, led by the US, threw all they could at the pandemic when it struck, pouring trillions of dollars into their economies in a bid to stimulate activity and support businesses and populations in difficulty.

Developing countries were able to do much less. While advanced economies announced the equivalent of 11.7 per cent of GDP in fiscal spending during the first six months of the pandemic, the figure for emerging middle-income countries was 5.7 per cent, according to the IMF. In low-income countries, it was just 3.2 per cent of GDP.

What support these countries did provide was largely funded by debt — made cheaper for some governments by the trillions poured into financial markets by the Fed and others. Data compiled by Fitch show the median level of government debt to GDP in 80 emerging markets rising from just under 50 per cent in 2019 to more than 60 per cent in 2020 — a huge increase for a single year.

The problem is particularly acute for the 50 smaller economies rated by Fitch, where not only are debt levels higher but the share of foreign currency debt is much greater than in the 30 largest economies. That leaves those economies, which are generally weaker than their larger peers, particularly exposed to the rising dollar.

A chart of Median government debt as a {21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} of GDP that shows emerging market government debt rose sharply in 2020

“The more debt and debt service you have, and the more foreign currency debt [you hold], the more rising US interest rates and the strong dollar are going to hurt,” says Parker.

Debt puts a brake on growth

The situation contributes to a far riskier picture for investors. Despite the broad resilience built up over recent years, many economies have had their financial buffers eroded by the pandemic. That, and the slower pace of economic growth, has contributed to their build-up in debt.

But those debts, in turn, put a brake on growth by weakening public finances and reducing the capital available for public goods and investment. This threatens to leave a legacy of fiscal difficulties that could take years to resolve.

“[It is] difficult to reduce budget deficits,” says Parker. “The pandemic has lowered living standards and increased inequality in many countries, so there are strong social pressures that make it difficult to implement fiscal retrenchment.”

A leading source of output growth for emerging economies has traditionally been global trade. But that too is deteriorating.

After a strong, trade-driven recovery for many countries last year, trade growth is set to slow sharply in 2022 and 2023 as pent-up demand dissipates, according to the World Bank. And while some countries such as South Africa were able to benefit from rising commodity exports in 2021, in others, especially in Latin America, gains were overshadowed by local difficulties, whether social, political or economic.

Especially problematic is the slowing pace of output growth in China, which for many years has been the biggest single engine of economic expansion for other developing countries. Changing priorities in Beijing mean that future growth will be both slower and also less import dependent, delivering a double blow to those reliant on Chinese demand.

In 2003, when Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva began his first term as president of Brazil, Chinese growth was at its most powerful. It drove the commodities supercycle that lifted hundreds of millions of people including many in Brazil out of poverty. Twenty years on and Lula is expected to take on Jair Bolsonaro, the incumbent, in October’s presidential race, against a very different backdrop. And neither candidate is thought likely to execute the kind of structural reform needed to create productive investment and growth.

“Emerging markets grow thanks to luck or skill,” says Lubin. “This year they are lacking both.”

Investors warn Omicron, Fed are a risk in a ‘growing but slowing’ economy

Significant indexes are poised to stop the yr boosted by the “Santa Claus Rally” influence, as the industry shrugs off problems connected with surging COVID-19 situation figures throughout the U.S. and the globe.

But in accordance to NJ-primarily based fiscal services agency Hennon & Walsh, the Omicron variant remains amid the top uncertainties in the market heading into the new year, no matter of whether traders are presently decoding it as such. 

“The two largest uncertainties for traders appropriate now clearly are Omicron and what might appear subsequent with respect to COVID-19,” CIO Kevin Mahn instructed Yahoo Finance Live, “and then, of study course, what the Federal Reserve may well or may not do in 2022.”

The Fed is envisioned to embark on a level hike marketing campaign next year, just as new coronavirus bacterial infections established documents in essential areas, which could yet prove a drag on the economic climate. 

The Omicron variant now includes above 70{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} of all new COVID-19 situations in the U.S. Just last week, a spectacular market-off attributed to these surging case numbers was a pointed reminder that a however raging pandemic continues to be the most significant wild card for 2022’s outlook. 

Mahn mentioned that investors ought to expect three prospective price hikes at 25 foundation factors starting in 2022. In spite of increasing costs, however, he believes expenditure options however exist in what he described as a “growing but slowing” surroundings.

“Financials, historically, have done nicely in mounting-fee environments when economies are increasing,” he explained, adding that Federal Reserve “would not be increasing fees if, in actuality, the economy was not continuing to broaden.”

The Fed voted unanimously on Dec. 15 to double the speed of the asset buys taper to $30 billion per month, bringing all asset buys to an conclusion by March 2022, but warned that “the path of the financial system proceeds to rely on the program of the virus.” 

The subsequent FOMC conference is scheduled for Jan. 25 and 26.

No matter whether extra Omicron-motivated volatility is on the horizon remains up in the air. But SoFi (SOFI) Head of Expenditure Approach Liz Younger told Yahoo Finance the market place serves as a ahead-searching barometer, even if bad news moves prices in the speedy expression.

“I believe this is a fantastic time to remind every person that the market place is a primary indicator,” she instructed Yahoo Finance. “So the market place is heading to go down, the marketplace is likely to bottom right before the lousy information peaks. We probably haven’t heard all of the lousy news nonetheless. We definitely haven’t strike a peak in the Omicron cases.”

Thomas Hum is a writer at Yahoo Finance. Observe him on Twitter @thomashumTV

Read the newest economical and enterprise information from Yahoo Finance

Comply with Yahoo Finance on Twitter, Instagram, YouTube, Fb, Flipboard, and LinkedIn

Tesla is at risk of losing its market dominance: analyst

Tesla (TSLA) bulls shouldn’t get far too comfortable with the firm’s current market dominance continuing unabated, warns Guggenheim analyst Ali Faghri. 

“Our balanced look at [on Tesla] is based on: 1) a favorable in close proximity to-expression setup — with demand outpacing supply, we see visibility to volume upside in 2022 and 2023 as new factories in Austin and Berlin ramp 2) aggressive gain about all original equipment manufacturers currently, like a substantial degree of vertical integration, a program defined auto technique, a dedicated charging network, and larger battery capacity 3) growing competitors, from each legacy gamers and new EV-only entrants, and as a final result, we see risk of moderating world EV share for Tesla from present lofty amounts (specifically article 2023 as competitors scale capacity),” explained Faghri in a notice to clientele on Monday. 

Faghri initiated protection on Tesla at a Neutral ranking with a $925 rate target.

Tesla shares at present trade at $902, down 20{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} more than the previous thirty day period as CEO Elon Musk has marketed massive chunks of stock to fulfill tax obligations. Musk has unloaded virtually $12 billion well worth of Tesla’s stock considering that Nov. 8.

To Faghri’s thesis on Tesla, it does surface the business has previously missing current market share as legacy automakers start their foray into the incredibly hot electrical automobile market place.

Tesla held 66.3{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} of EV registrations in the 2nd quarter of this yr, reduced than the 79.5{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} it held just one 12 months ago, in accordance to facts from Experian. GM-owned Chevrolet observed its share of EV registrations increase to 9.6{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} from 8.3{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} a 12 months earlier. Ford, Nissan and Audi also picked up industry share in the EV field, for each Experian’s facts. 

Ongoing Faghri, “We count on electrical automobiles (EVs) to get to 14{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} of international profits by 2025 and 36{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} by 2030, representing an ~30{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} compound annual expansion price over the following 10 years. EV adoption will be pushed primarily by tightening world wide emissions polices and amplified dedication by legacy automakers to electrification. We also see improving upon charge of possession and auto general performance/safety rewards as key motorists of developing penetration of EVs globally.”

The analyst initiated protection of Tesla rival Lucid with a Neutral as perfectly. Rate goal: $38, relatively in line with present buying and selling stages. 

But Faghri just isn’t fully down on Tesla, as he outlined an upside price goal of $1,963.

“Further traction with AV/robo-taxi attempts, providing on incredible battery value enhancement targets, and potential for a superior quantity ‘Model 2’ in the $25k selling price variety,” said Faghri on what it would get to turn out to be far more bullish on Tesla’s inventory.

Brian Sozzi is an editor-at-large and anchor at Yahoo Finance. Stick to Sozzi on Twitter @BrianSozzi and on LinkedIn.

Abide by Yahoo Finance on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, Flipboard, LinkedIn, YouTube, and reddit

Why bitcoin may face another 20{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} plunge in coming weeks, as ‘risk is heightened,’ says prominent technical analyst: ‘We’re watching $37,000.’

Hello, there! I’m stepping in this week for MarketWatch’s crypto reporter Frances Yue.

I’ll walk you through the latest and greatest in digital assets this week so far, as we enter the week before an important meeting of the Federal Reserve and consider its possible impact on bitcoin and other crypto, if any. We’ll also talk about the whipsawing weekend that was and what to expect from here.

Send tips, or feedback, and find us on Twitter at @mdecambre or @FrancesYue_.

But most important, sign up here to get Distributed Ledger delivered fresh to your inbox weekly!

Crypto movers
Biggest Gainers

Price

{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} 7-day Return

Near Protocol (NEAR)

$9.24

12.42

Terra (LUNA)

$67.26

6.95

BitTorrent (BTT)

$0.003313

5.57

UNUS SED LEO (LEO)

$3.70

4.3

Huobi Token (HT)

$9.86

2.54

Source: CoinMarketCap.com of the top 100 as of Dec. 9

Biggest Decliners

Price

{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} 7-day Return

Kadena (KDA)

$10.48

-36.83

Qtum (QTUM)

$10.01

-33.26

THORChain (RUNE)

$7.13

-32.39

Fantom (FTM)

$1.45

-30.50

THETA (THETA)

$4.44

-30.26

Source: CoinMarketCap.com of the top 100 as of Dec. 9

After the crypto crash?

MarketWatch’s Distributed Ledger spoke to Katie Stockton, founder of technical analysis firm Fairfield Strategies, about the crash in crypto over the past weekend. The declines took bitcoin
BTCUSD
to around $42,000 and Ether
ETHUSD
on the Ethereum blockchain to around $3,500 before those digital assets bounced back.

Although Fairlead is fairly bullish long term, over the next six months or so, on the crypto sector, including bitcoin and Ether, Stockton said that some considerable damage had been done to the uptrend in the short to intermediate-term, based on her analysis.

A short-term breakdown in trend was confirmed on Sunday, when bitcoin failed to return to its recent support at $53,000 based on the September high and now that it is hanging well below that level—it was trading at $47,702 on CoinDesk, down 5.6{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}—another support level of $44,000 needs to be the next point to monitor, with the $37,000 serving as secondary technical support area.

“We feel that risk is heightened near term and even over the next two months or so,” Stockton said.

The popular analyst who uses chart models and gauges of momentum to forecast moves in assets from stocks to crypto said that she feels that the support level for bitcoin at $44,000 will likely be breached and the secondary support level, which defines the recent uptrend in bitcoin, will be a pivotal area for investors to watch in recent trade.

So is there cause to worry about another flash crash? Stockton says that it’s impossible to know for sure but believes that much of the tumble that took place in the wee hours of last Saturday are likely flushed out of the system since it was underpinned by unwinding in derivatives.

Certainly the bulls are hoping that is the case.

Crypto goes to Washington

MarketWatch’s Chris Matthews covered a highly anticipated testimony from some of the biggest names in crypto in front of Washington lawmakers.

Crypto execs, including those from popular digital-asset exchange Coinbase Global Inc.
COIN,
made the case that their technologies hold promise for the future, and that the growth of their more than $2 trillion industry shouldn’t be impeded by wrongheaded legislation.

The nascent industry is hoping to push Congress to create a new regulatory framework for digital assets that could help them avoid a costly showdown with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

“A successful policy framework would allow crypto platforms to offer both spot and derivatives trading on crypto assets under one unified system, with one rule book and one technology platform to manage risks related to all trading activity in customer accounts,” said Sam Bankman-Fried, CEO of FTX, told the House Financial Services Hearing on crypto markets.

Officials from Circle Internet Financial Ltd., issuer of a stablecoin crypto, bitcoin-mining firm Bitfury Group Ltd., cryptocurrency-payments system, Stellar Development Foundation, and blockchain firm Paxos Trust Co. also testified.

The Wall Street Journal reported that one of the main concerns among those lawmakers wary of crypto is that its rapid growth poses a threat to financial stability, is rife with fraud and manipulation, and isn’t environmentally friendly since mining virtual coins uses lots of real energy.

Crypto shares

In crypto-related company trading, shares of Coinbase Global Inc. traded down 9{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} to $287 Thursday afternoon. It was down 1.6{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} for the past five trading sessions. Michael Saylor’s MicroStrategy Inc.
MSTR
 traded 6.4{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} lower on Thursday to $595.58, and was down 5.5{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} over the past five days.

Mining company Riot Blockchain Inc.
RIOT
shares fell 9.1{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} to $26, contributing to an 6.9{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} loss over the past five days. Shares of Marathon Digital Holdings Inc.
MARA
were down nearly 11{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} to 41.72, but were up 0.3{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} over the past five days. Another miner Ebang International Holdings Inc
EBON.
fell 7{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} to $1.33, but was up 2.4{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} over the past five days.

Overstock.com Inc
OSTK.
 traded down 3.6{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} to $78.57. The shares went down 2.6{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} over the five-session period.

Square Inc.’s shares
SQ
fell 4.1{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} to $186.85, paring its week-to-date gain to 3.1{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}. Tesla Inc.’s shares
TSLA
 traded down 5{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} to $1,015, trading flat for the week.

PayPal Holdings Inc.
PYPL
 fell 2.1{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} to $192.72, while it recorded a 4.8{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} gain over the five-session stretch. NVIDIA Corp.
NVDA
meanwhile, slumped 3{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} to $308.72, but was looking at a 0.6{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} advance over the past five days.

Advanced Micro Devices Inc.
AMD
 was off 4.3{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} to $139.04 and logged a 3.5{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} loss over the past five trading days, as of Thursday afternoon.

In the fund space, ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF
BITO
were 6.1{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} lower to $30.29 Thursday, and was down nearly 11{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} for the week thus far, while Valkyrie Bitcoin Strategy ETF
BTF
was down 5.9{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}, with a week-to-date skid of nearly 11{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}. VanEck Bitcoin Strategy ETF
XBTF
fell 6.4{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} and was showing a nearly 11{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} weekly drop, as of Thursday afternoon.

Grayscale Bitcoin Trust
GBTC
 was trading to $37.44, off 7.1{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} late-afternoon Thursday, heading for a weekly loss of 10.5{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}.

Read: Grayscale Investment wants its largest bitcoin trust to be an ETF. A miscue briefly made its wish come true.

Must reads

Q&A: How to Manage Climate-Change Risk in Fixed-Income Portfolios | Financial Advisors

Climate-change risk is present in nearly every industry – so ubiquitous, in fact, that investors cannot diversify away from it. That means that investors must learn how to manage the risk in both their equity and fixed-income portfolios.

We spoke with Ognjen Sosa, chief investment officer at Breckinridge Capital Advisors, an asset management firm specializing in investment-grade fixed income and environmental, sustainable and governance, or ESG, integration. The asset manager focused its 2021 issuer engagement program on climate-change risk, speaking with nearly 60 subject matter experts in addition to the routine interactions its analysts have during security research and selection for their fixed-income portfolios. Sosa shares how financial advisors and investors should think about climate-change risk in fixed-income portfolios.

How is climate-change risk a risk multiplier for corporate, municipal and securitized bonds? 

Climate risk is sometimes suggestive of higher event risk or a more challenging long-term credit environment.

For example, in the municipal bond market, communities in one coastal state face higher-than-average, climate-driven disaster risks relative to U.S. peers. Right now, most issuers are insulated from disaster risk: The population is growing, most communities have strong reserves, and states’ catastrophe funds and subsidized federal flood insurance insulate many homeowners from material credit risk in the wake of a hurricane or extreme flooding.

But the insurance environment may become less generous. Some communities may become less likely to rebuild certain areas of their tax bases after large storms. Issuers with lower reserves and less ability to finance infrastructure hardening will be more at risk as climate change accelerates.

Corporations face physical climate risks. For instance, the real estate sector has heavy investments in coastal office properties that may be at risk from rising sea levels. Corporations that do not consider climate change may miss out on growth opportunities as the world transitions to a low- or no-carbon future. Utilities that miss out on renewable energy investments may have longer-term growth challenges as fossil fuel power plants decline in utilization.

Energy companies may face rising risks and opportunities related to climate transition as their business model shifts in response to investors and regulators. Large U.S. bank lenders to the energy sector may also face risk and opportunities through better pricing carbon risk and financing green energy.

Securitized bonds also face risks associated with climate change. For mortgage-backed securities, properties backed by underlying mortgage pools are subject to risks from droughts, wildfires or flooding.

How does climate-change risk impact fixed income specifically?

Climate-change risk – in addition to inflation risk, credit risk, default risk and liquidity risk – is another long-term risk for fixed-income investors that should be considered and ideally be priced and managed.

Specifically, climate-change risk can impact creditworthiness and the ability of a borrower to repay fixed obligations as they come due over time. Climate-transition risk can render certain assets stranded or business segments obsolete, which could also impact cash flows, creditworthiness and the ability of an issuer to pay back fixed-income instruments.

How should financial advisors incorporate climate change in their clients’ fixed income portfolios?

Advisors may want to explore with clients their concerns about climate change and their investments.

The advisors can make appropriate recommendations of strategies that reflect a client’s risk tolerance, investing horizons and financial goals while integrating the client’s views on climate risk. For example, strategies that are centered on fossil-fuel-free or values-based themes may align with the investor’s goals.

Finally, monitor and report to clients on the performance of their climate-risk-related allocations. Look for specific data within the selected portfolios that are responsive to the client’s climate-change concerns, as revealed during the initial fact-finding discussions.

Disclosure around climate risk continues to be a challenge for investors and advisors. How can financial advisors address this challenge?

Look for asset managers experienced in climate-related investing. Managers who can explain how their investment process integrates ESG risk analysis and climate-risk considerations typically can point to a repeatable approach to security selection. This also helps to avoid investment approaches that are potentially inauthentic – so-called “greenwashing.”

Select managers who report performance in accordance with climate-related objectives. This can facilitate personalization as the advisor subsequently monitors and discloses performance.

Finally, look for asset managers that demonstrate commitment to sustainability in their own operations. Ask, “Do you produce an annual corporate sustainability report? Do you report according to protocols provided by the United Nations or the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures, for example?” These can be additional indicators of commitment.

Canada’s Housing Imbalance Poses ‘Greatest’ Risk to Financial System, Watchdog Says

By Paul Vieira

OTTAWA–The current imbalance in Canada between solid demand for housing and the limited supply available is driving up prices and represents the “greatest” risk in the country’s financial system, Canada’s banking regulator says.

Peter Routledge, head of the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions, said Tuesday that demand for housing remains strong across the country, leading to “very significant” price increases.

Recent data from the Canadian Real Estate Association indicated benchmark house prices in October rose more than 23{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} compared with the same period a year ago. In part, this increase is related to a lack of inventory available for buyers.

CREA estimates that as of October, there were nearly two months of housing inventory–or the amount of time it would take, given the current pace of transactions, for every active residential real-estate listing on the market to sell. CREA said the historical inventory average is roughly five months.

“The greatest prudential risk in Canada’s financial system is the supply-demand imbalance in housing,” Mr. Routledge said in a virtual speech to financial analysts in Vancouver, British Columbia. “The imbalance tends to drive price increases to ever higher levels relative to income; this in turn induces more Canadians to resort to more leverage when buying a home.”

Mr. Routledge cited recent data from the economics team at Bank of Nova Scotia, which calculated that Canada has the lowest number of housing units per 1,000 residents of any Group of Seven country.

Mr. Routledge added that the need to bring the level of housing construction aligned with demand “is an imperative for long-term financial stability.”

For the past decade and until recently, Canadian officials have targeted tougher rules on mortgage-financing to cool demand for housing and slow white-house price growth in major markets such as Toronto and Vancouver, British Columbia. Now, Canadian officials have signaled a shift in policy, eyeing billions toward building additional housing units in urban areas, tailored to middle-class households, as the best way to address housing affordability.

Earlier Tuesday, a senior Bank of Canada official said elevated household debt levels have re-emerged as a concern for the central bank, in part because of a sharp rise in housing prices.

Bank of Canada Deputy Gov. Paul Beaudry said the prevalence of highly indebted households –which are defined as those with a debt-to-income ratio above 350{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}–likely improved during the first year of the pandemic as many Canadians accumulated savings and paid down debt. But that trend appears to be reversing, he said, in part because of the worsening quality of Canadians’ mortgage borrowing in recent quarters.

Write to Paul Vieira at paul.vieira@wsj.com