Every December, Yahoo Finance selects a Company of the Year, based on its market performance and its achievements that particular year. In 2021, Microsoft (MSFT) took home the crown, smashing through the $2 trillion market capitalization mark and seeing a 53{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} surge in its stock price as of Dec. 16, year-to-date.
However, the spirit of Festivus has taught us we can learn just as much from the bad as the good by airing our grievances. That’s why Yahoo Finance also selects a Worst Company of the Year, polling our audience as to which company upset them the most.
Our survey’s 1,541 respondents were mad about a lot this year, from the Robinhood (HOOD) trading freezes last winter to electric truck startup Nikola still not having its act together. But one company irked them the most — Facebook (FB). The survey’s results shed more light on why the company decided to rebrand this year to a new name: Meta Platforms.
The open-ended survey was posted on Yahoo Finance on Dec. 4 and Dec. 5, and dozens of names were submitted. Facebook received 8{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} of the write-in vote.
Facebook has had its share of controversies this year. It’s been under the antitrust microscope and faced a flurry of allegations from a whistleblower claiming Facebook ignored safety issues for the sake of growth. Congress is constantly demanding answers from the company on both fronts. At the same time, some critics, including conservatives, say Facebook over-policed the platform’s speech and stifled their voices. Other critics, including those on the left side of the aisle, claim Facebook allows the spread of misinformation.
US whistleblower and former Facebook engineer Frances Haugen gives a testimony on the negative impact of big tech companies products on users, at the European Parliament in Brussels, on November 8, 2021.(Photo by JOHN THYS / AFP) (Photo by JOHN THYS/AFP via Getty Images)
What is especially interesting about the Company Formerly Known as Facebook is just how many and varied the reasons people dislike it. It received 50{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} more votes than the second-place finisher, Chinese e-commerce giant Alibaba, not for one singular offense but for a litany of grievances from groups of people that may have little else to agree about.
There were significant complaints of censorship, mainly of the right and conservative voices that felt that the “free-speech police” was being unfair and they were owed the right to say whatever they wanted to on the platform.
On the other side, people hectored the platform for failing to police significant misinformation that in the view of critics contributed to people not taking the pandemic’s potential for death seriously (797,877 official deaths in the U.S. and counting). Facebook was also blamed for the rise of far-right extremism and “undermining democracy worldwide,” as one respondent put it.
Outside of the political conversation, many respondents were upset with the company’s effects on children and young people, citing its photo-sharing site Instagram and its effects on mental health, after internal documents revealed the company knew Instagram made teenage girls feel worse about body image issues but didn’t address the problem.
Facebook/Meta Platforms did not respond to a request for comment.
Can the company redeem itself?
Around 30{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} of Yahoo Finance readers who responded to the survey said that Facebook or Meta could redeem itself.
One respondent said Facebook could redeem itself by acknowledging and apologizing for what it did and donating a “sizable amount” of its profits for a foundation to help reverse its harm. While some people saw the Meta rebrand as a cynical attempt to change the conversation, following Don Draper’s advice in scandal, others were excited by the potential of a new direction that could a) be interesting and b) something different from the aging social media model.
A significant amount of responses focused on executives and founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg. Zuckerberg has certainly never been Mr. Popular, which Aaron Sorkin and David Fincher decided was the reason he created “The Facebook,” in the movie “The Social Network.” But he has long been seen as a visionary with an uncanny knack at predicting (or manifesting) the future, making it unlikely he departs from the company he founded, shaped, and pivoted.
One way it could redeem itself, for the angry investors in the survey, would be to grow its stock price, apparently. The stock is up 22{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} year-to-date — strong, but lagging the S&P 500— but down around 13{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} from its September high.
Zuckerberg and co. have their challenges cut out for them in 2022. Fortunately for them, they’re already reinventing the company.
The (dis)honorable mentions
The annual airing of grievances saw a few companies get special mention from Yahoo Finance readers.
Alibaba’s (BABA) almost 50{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} drop year-to-date earned it the number two spot. Investors are upset at having lost money.
AT&T’s (T) loss of 24{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} year-to-date as the S&P 500 saw a 24{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} increase. Like Alibaba, this is a story of share price dissatisfaction.
Nikola (NKLA) and its many issues last year, with a short seller claiming it was a fraud.
Tesla (TSLA) stock has soared, but people are furious with the company rolling out products before they are ready, sexual harrassment scandals, and the general cult of personality surrounding 2021’s Time Person of the Year.
Market-maker Citadel Securities and retail trading platform Robinhood (HOOD) had their time in the doghouse during the Gamestock hubbub almost a year ago, and many have not forgotten — and continue to see these players as icing out ordinary retail investors they purport to help.
This was an open-ended survey performed on Survey Monkey via the Yahoo Finance home page from Dec. 4 to Dec,. 5. 1,541 people responded.
–
Ethan Wolff-Mann is a Senior Writer and Chief of Staff at Yahoo Finance. When he is reporting, he focuses on investing, consumer issues, and personal finance. Follow him on Twitter @ewolffmann.
LONDON, Dec 9 (Reuters) – Britain’s finance firms have began issuing an array of updated work from home guidance to staff after the government toughened up rules, Benefit Group.
But following stricter government COVID-19 guidance to work from home will be a “challenge” for accountants as they head for their busiest time of the year, auditor PwC said on Thursday.
Britain announced tougher restrictions on Wednesday, ordering people to work from home to slow the spread of the Omicron coronavirus variant. read more
Register now for FREE unlimited access to reuters.com
Register
Employees in Britain’s huge financial services sector had begun returning to the office in large numbers in recent months, with financial districts in the City of London and Canary Wharf busy in the run up to Christmas.
“As always we will follow government guidelines, but there’s no denying this will be a challenge for some sectors,” said Kevin Ellis, PwC’s chairman and senior partner.
“The majority of our people had returned to the office two to three days a week. It’s the busy season for audit and there’s also lots of deal activity that benefits from some in person meetings,” Ellis said.
PwC offices will remain open for people who have a “business or personal need to use them”, he said.
PwC, along with EY, Deloitte and KPMG are dubbed the “Big Four” and dominate auditing of blue-chip companies globally, with the year end period their busiest as accountants make checks for annual company reports ahead of publication.
EY and Deloitte said they have asked staff to comply with the government guidance, though their offices are still open for employees who need them.
“We ask anyone who comes into our offices to wear a face mask and to have taken a lateral flow test within 48 hours of coming in,” a Deloitte spokesperson said.
The City of London Corporation said the fresh restrictions will be a disappointment to business in the historic “square mile” financial district it governs.
“We will urge City businesses, workers and residents to follow the new rules,” said Catherine McGuinness, the City’s policy chair.
“But we also ask the government to set out a clear roadmap to normality early in the new year and base all decisions on data. We need to find ways to live with the virus which allows the economy to prosper,” she said.
Banks also started to issue revised guidance to staff including Deutsche Bank (DBKGn.DE), which told its nearly 8,000 staff in Britain it was discouraging work social gatherings in what would usually be a busy time for Christmas parties, a source at the bank said.
Staff numbers at Deutsche Bank London offices will be significantly reduced from Monday, though employees with certain roles such as traders or those with personal reasons can still go in.
The shift also comes a day after U.S. investment bank Jefferies Financial Group (JEF.N) told staff to work from home again and cancelled all client parties after a spate of COVID-19 cases. read more
Register now for FREE unlimited access to reuters.com
Register
Reporting by Huw Jones and Iain Withers; editing by David Evans
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.
New York, December 10, 2021 – Moody’s Investors Service has affirmed the Aa2 senior unsecured
debt rating and Prime-1 short-term issuer rating of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (Berkshire, NYSE: BRK)
as well as the ratings on subsidiary debts that are unconditionally and irrevocably guaranteed by
Berkshire (see list below). The rating outlook for Berkshire is stable. RATINGS RATIONALE According to Moody’s, the rating affirmation reflects Berkshire’s extraordinarily well capitalized
(re)insurance operations, its highly diversified earnings and cash flow from regulated and non-
regulated businesses, and its conservative financial policy, by which it maintains of a large liquidity
pool and moderate financial leverage. Partly offsetting these strengths are potential earnings
and capital volatility related to the company’s large, concentrated stock investments and its large
individual (re)insurance transactions. Other challenges include enterprise risk management given
the vast business portfolio, and leadership succession given the critical role CEO Warren Buffett has
played in developing Berkshire’s culture and financial performance. Berkshire reported net operating earnings of $20.2 billion for the first nine months of 2021, up
19{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} versus the prior year period, reflecting strong double-digit increases in the railroad, utilities
and energy, and manufacturing, service and retailing segments, partly offset by a double-digit
decline in the (re)insurance segment. The year-to-date decline in (re)insurance results reflects
lower underwriting income, partly because of higher catastrophe losses, along with slightly lower
investment income. Moody’s expects that Berkshire will benefit from the recovering economy in 2022
and will continue to grow its operating earnings, cash flow and capital base over time. As of September 30, 2021, Berkshire had consolidated cash and equivalents totaling $149 billion, a
majority held within the (re)insurance segment. The company had total borrowings of $115 billion, a
majority issued by the railroad and utilities and energy segments. Consolidated total leverage, which
incorporates all reported debt plus Moody’s adjustments for pensions and leases, was about 20{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} at
September 30, 2021, within Moody’s rating expectations. Berkshire generates healthy pretax interest
coverage, averaging more than 10 times over the past five years. The company holds at least $30
billion of cash and equivalents at or readily available to the parent to address potential needs or
opportunities. FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS Factors that could lead to an upgrade of Berkshire’s ratings include (i) meaningful improvement in
standalone credit profiles of major operating units, and (ii) continued holdings of substantial cash and
equivalents at or readily available to the parent company relative to outstanding indebtedness. Factors that could lead to a rating downgrade include: (i) meaningful deterioration in standalone
credit profiles(s) of one or more major operating units, (ii) a shift towards a less conservative
financial profile (for example, total consolidated leverage exceeding 30{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}, or total leverage excluding
railroad, utilities and energy exceeding 15{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}), (iii) losses from (re)insurance underwriting and/or
investments causing a 15{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} decline in shareholders’ equity in a given year, or (iv) a significant
background image
decline in cash and equivalents at or readily available to the parent (for example, declining toward
$30 billion, which management cites as a minimum balance). Moody’s has affirmed the following ratings: Berkshire Hathaway Inc. — long-term issuer rating and senior unsecured debt at Aa2, senior
unsecured shelf at (P)Aa2, short-term issuer rating at Prime-1; Berkshire Hathaway Finance Corporation — backed senior unsecured debt at Aa2, backed senior
unsecured shelf at (P)Aa2; The Lubrizol Corporation — backed senior unsecured debt at Aa2; Precision Castparts Corp. — backed senior unsecured debt at Aa2. The rating outlook for these companies is stable. The methodologies used in these ratings were Property and Casualty Insurers
Methodology published in September 2021 and available at
. Alternatively, please see the Rating Methodologies page on www.moodys.com
for a copy of these methodologies. Based in Omaha, Nebraska, Berkshire is a holding company engaged through subsidiaries in
diversified businesses that fall into four broad segments: (re)insurance; railroad; utilities and
energy; and manufacturing, service and retailing. Berkshire also holds sizable minority interests in
several publicly traded firms through its portfolio of common stocks, held mainly by its (re)insurance
subsidiaries. Berkshire generated total revenue of $204 billion, net operating earnings of $20.2
billion, and net income attributable to Berkshire of $50.1 billion for the first nine months of 2021.
The main differences between net income and operating earnings are that net income includes
unrealized gains on stock investments plus a smaller amount of realized investment gains. Berkshire
had total assets of $921 billion and Berkshire shareholders’ equity of $472 billion as of September
30, 2021. REGULATORY DISCLOSURES For further specification of Moody’s key rating assumptions and sensitivity analysis, see
the sections Methodology Assumptions and Sensitivity to Assumptions in the disclosure
form. Moody’s Rating Symbols and Definitions can be found at:
https://www.moodys.com/
researchdocumentcontentpage.aspx?docid=PBC_79004
.
For ratings issued on a program, series, category/class of debt or security this announcement
provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or
note of the same series, category/class of debt, security or pursuant to a program for which the
ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody’s rating practices.
For ratings issued on a support provider, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures
in relation to the credit rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular credit
rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider’s credit rating.
For provisional ratings, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the
provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent
to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not
changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would have affected the
background image
rating. For further information please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective
issuer on www.moodys.com. For any affected securities or rated entities receiving direct credit support from the primary entity(ies)
of this credit rating action, and whose ratings may change as a result of this credit rating action, the
associated regulatory disclosures will be those of the guarantor entity. Exceptions to this approach
exist for the following disclosures, if applicable to jurisdiction: Ancillary Services, Disclosure to rated
entity, Disclosure from rated entity. The ratings have been disclosed to the rated entity or its designated agent(s) and issued with no
amendment resulting from that disclosure. These ratings are solicited. Please refer to Moody’s Policy for Designating and Assigning Unsolicited
Credit Ratings available on its website www.moodys.com. Regulatory disclosures contained in this press release apply to the credit rating and, if applicable, the
related rating outlook or rating review. Moody’s general principles for assessing environmental, social and governance (ESG) risks in
The Global Scale Credit Rating on this Credit Rating Announcement was issued by one of Moody’s
affiliates outside the EU and is endorsed by Moody’s Deutschland GmbH, An der Welle 5, Frankfurt
am Main 60322, Germany, in accordance with Art.4 paragraph 3 of the Regulation (EC) No
1060/2009 on Credit Rating Agencies. Further information on the EU endorsement status and on the
Moody’s office that issued the credit rating is available on www.moodys.com. The Global Scale Credit Rating on this Credit Rating Announcement was issued by one of Moody’s
affiliates outside the UK and is endorsed by Moody’s Investors Service Limited, One Canada
Square, Canary Wharf, London E14 5FA under the law applicable to credit rating agencies in the UK.
Further information on the UK endorsement status and on the Moody’s office that issued the credit
rating is available on www.moodys.com. Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to the lead rating analyst and to the
Moody’s legal entity that has issued the rating. Please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for additional regulatory
disclosures for each credit rating. Bruce Ballentine
licensors and affiliates (collectively, “MOODY’S”). All rights reserved. CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS AFFILIATES ARE THEIR CURRENT
OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS,
OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MATERIALS, PRODUCTS, SERVICES AND
INFORMATION PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S (COLLECTIVELY, “PUBLICATIONS”) MAY INCLUDE
SUCH CURRENT OPINIONS. MOODY’S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN
ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME
DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT OR IMPAIRMENT.
SEE APPLICABLE MOODY’S RATING SYMBOLS AND DEFINITIONS PUBLICATION FOR
INFORMATION ON THE TYPES OF CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS ADDRESSED
BY MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE
VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS, NON-CREDIT ASSESSMENTS (“ASSESSMENTS”), AND
OTHER OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS
OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE
QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS
OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S ANALYTICS, INC. AND/OR ITS AFFILIATES.
MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS DO
NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND MOODY’S
CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND
DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR
SECURITIES. MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND
PUBLICATIONS DO NOT COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY
PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY’S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS AND
OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLISHES ITS PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND
UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY
AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE,
HOLDING, OR SALE. MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS, AND PUBLICATIONS
ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS
AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS,
ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS OR PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT
DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER
PROFESSIONAL ADVISER.
background image
ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT
LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR
OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED,
DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR
ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY
MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY’S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS ARE
NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY ANY PERSON AS A BENCHMARK AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED
FOR REGULATORY PURPOSES AND MUST NOT BE USED IN ANY WAY THAT COULD RESULT
IN THEM BEING CONSIDERED A BENCHMARK. All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY’S from sources believed by it to be
accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other
factors, however, all information contained herein is provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind.
MOODY’S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit
rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY’S considers to be reliable including, when
appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY’S is not an auditor and cannot
in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in
preparing its Publications. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents,
representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect,
special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection
with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if
MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers
is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to:
(a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant
financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY’S. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents,
representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses
or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but
excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt,
by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of,
MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers,
arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use
any such information. NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS,
COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF
ANY CREDIT RATING, ASSESSMENT, OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE
BY MOODY’S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER. Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s
Corporation (“MCO”), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and
municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody’s
Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any credit rating, agreed to pay to Moody’s
Investors Service, Inc. for credit ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees ranging from
$1,000 to approximately $5,000,000. MCO and Moody’s Investors Service also maintain policies
and procedures to address the independence of Moody’s Investors Service credit ratings and credit
rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO
and rated entities, and between entities who hold credit ratings from Moody’s Investors Service and
background image
have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}, is posted
annually at
www.moodys.com
under the heading “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance —
Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy.” Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the
Australian Financial Services License of MOODY’S affiliate, Moody’s Investors Service Pty Limited
ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody’s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136
972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to “wholesale
clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access
this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY’S that you are, or are accessing
the document as a representative of, a “wholesale client” and that neither you nor the entity you
represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to “retail clients” within
the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY’S credit rating is an opinion as
to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or
any form of security that is available to retail investors. Additional terms for Japan only: Moody’s Japan K.K. (“MJKK”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency
subsidiary of Moody’s Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody’s Overseas Holdings Inc.,
a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody’s SF Japan K.K. (“MSFJ”) is a wholly-owned credit rating
agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization
(“NRSRO”). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-
NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated
obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit
rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers
are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively. MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including
corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated
by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any credit rating, agreed to pay to
MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for credit ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees ranging
from JPY125,000 to approximately JPY550,000,000. MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory
Alibaba’s longtime finance chief Maggie Wu is stepping down as the Chinese ecommerce giant shakes up its organisation to reverse slowing growth and halt the fall of its share price to a five-year low.
The ecommerce group founded by Jack Ma more than two decades ago has been under pressure since Ma criticised Chinese regulators in a Shanghai speech last year that led to the suspension of sister company Ant Group’s blockbuster initial public offering.
Alibaba’s US-listed shares have tumbled 64 per cent since the IPO was derailed, and the group was fined a record $2.8bn for antitrust abuses this year. Analysts said it had poorly navigated Beijing’s campaign to rein in tech companies.
“This year, Alibaba has raised its share buybacks while competitors like Tencent have spent big to fulfil the government’s common prosperity aims,” said Robin Zhu of Bernstein, referring to Beijing’s policy to encourage wealth redistribution.
“Investors have been discussing accountability in management so [Wu’s departure] is not a total surprise,” added Zhu, noting she had led the company for many years.
Deputy finance chief Toby Xu, who joined Alibaba from accounting firm PwC three years ago, will take over the role from Wu in April.
Alibaba last month slashed its growth prospects in response to China’s slowing economic momentum and mounting competition from rivals.
The ecommerce company, the largest Chinese group listed in the US, has come under additional pressure after ride-hailing leader Didi Chuxing announced on Friday it would delist from the New York Stock Exchange just five months after its IPO.
Didi’s delisting plan has stoked concerns about the future of other Chinese companies listed overseas. China’s securities regulator said on Sunday it was not pushing companies to withdraw from US exchanges, adding that it was working with Washington to resolve a stand-off over access to audit papers that could result in all Chinese groups being kicked off Wall Street within three years.
Alibaba chief Daniel Zhang on Monday outlined further structural changes that will consolidate the company’s international business under the leadership of 36-year-old executive Jiang Fan, while co-founder Trudy Dai takes over its domestic ecommerce business.
Jiang ably helmed Taobao’s push into mobile and was seen as a contender to take the reins of the entire group until a personal scandal turned into a public relations crisis for Alibaba last year.
Wu, who managed Alibaba’s books through three public listings, was known for taking subtle jabs at less frugal competitors in earnings calls and for her steady hand in the company.
“Maggie is forever calm and unflappable, regardless of ups and downs in the global capital markets and macro environment,” said Zhang.
“She is humble and resilient, and has been my irreplaceable and closest partner over the years,” he added. Wu will remain at Alibaba as a partner and director.
Wu called her resignation the “culmination of extensive preparation over many years” and a step to promote a new generation of leaders at the company.
“The markets will always have ups and downs, but Alibaba has ambitious long-term goals,” she said.
#techAsia newsletter
Your crucial guide to the billions being made and lost in the world of Asia Tech. A curated menu of exclusive news, crisp analysis, smart data and the latest tech buzz from the FT and Nikkei
Popular discussions surrounding “the rise of the robots” often manifest as hyperbolic sci-fi posturing, though it is unlikely that the Terminator prophecy will come to fruition any time soon. But that does not mean “robots” (or at least digitally automated processes) are not rising in our world. In fact, according to an August 2020 Deloitte/IMA survey, 51.4{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} of finance leaders reported that automation would impact the way their organization worked in the coming five years.
And yet, despite fears of an AI takeover, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) reported almost 300,000 financial services job openings as of September 2021. Job openings in for positions that are not as easy to automate, such as accounting, bookkeeping, and auditing, are expected to rise over the next decade. With more job options available to them, employees, especially top talent, may become harder to retain. Given that more than half of workers in the US are currently considering a career change, there should be no illusions that the finance industry will be immune to such trends.
To retain top financial analysts and talent, employers must take care of their employees’ professional and personal needs. But they must also harness automation and digital processes not as a means to replace the need for human workers, but to help make their jobs simpler, more efficient, and more enjoyable.
Take care of your employees
It seems obvious, but if more employers took this call to action more seriously, the “Great Resignation” may not have become as widespread. In these challenging pandemic times and amid an increasingly challenging labor landscape, businesses now more than ever need to keep their fingers on the pulse of employee satisfaction – both professionally and personally.
Employees are saying this loud and clear, and it falls on the business leadership to listen. A recent corporate survey found that more than half of employees considered good benefits essential to their employment. However, only 31{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} of those surveyed were satisfied with their current conditions. Even negative candidate experiences at the interview stage can have an impact on the perception of a company, and employee retention begins with satisfaction.
Meeting employee wellness needs can take many forms, from offering individualized benefits and tangible compensation to providing flexibility with options like hybrid working, which has taken off in the wake of the pandemic. COVID-19 has also brought a barrage of new and unique challenges, and accordingly, considerations like mental health promotion and childcare benefits are more pressing than ever.
On a professional level, taking care of employees can mean anything from prioritizing an engaged and continuous process of feedback to providing opportunities for workers to broaden and sharpen their skillsets. For example, supplementary educational courses can be a good way to imbue employees with a sense of self-determination, vision, and meaning. This kind of dynamic, initiative-taking approach to employee management can go a long way toward stopping employees from heading for the exits.
Simplify, simplify, simplify
Burnout is a further challenge, with 61{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} of people experiencing this at some point in their career. Financial professionals are often especially overworked and overwhelmed, often at the hand of complex and slow paper-based workflows. Frustration with such inefficiencies could drive some workers to more “streamlined” positions that would reduce the symptoms of burnout. Here’s where it pays to try and simplify day-to-day processes in a way that benefits both employees and the company’s bottom line.
If CFOs simplified their operations accordingly, beginning with the hiring process itself, they would be more likely to hire and retain more satisfied and more productive employees. Indeed, Deloitte reports that employees who feel their talents are being utilized well are more likely to stay in their positions.
Figuring this out can’t be a one-way conversation: Engaging employees in improving organizational operations and structure is crucial. Those who are doing the work itself on a daily basis are very likely to have the keenest understanding of where improvements can be made, and asking for employee input will not only yield practical outcomes, but it also provide employees with a sense of inclusion and authenticity that in turn fosters greater loyalty.
Make technology work for you
Technology can help relieve the burden of overworked accountants and CFOs, but only if used and implemented with savvy. Workers who feel that technology is being implemented in ways specifically designed to help them will be happier with their ability to do their jobs, more likely to stay in their positions, and more resilient down the line to technologically driven changes. On the other hand, technological processes that are too complex can have the reverse effect, turning financial professionals away.
For employers navigating the post-pandemic needs of their workforces, it will also prove essential to use data, AI, and other technologies to glean in-depth insights into employee satisfaction and employment trends, both within their company as well as in the wider industry.
The age of tenured employment has given way to an era of “job-hopping,” raising the stakes for employers. As such, employers must pay attention now more than ever to the shifting dynamics of the workforce and react accordingly in order to preserve their top talent.
This is hardly the first major challenge to confront the industry in recent years. The 2008 crash shook the world of finance, and the recent shocks that have come about due to the pandemic also have the potential to radically reshape the industry. Cultural shakeups are likely to continue, and businesses must develop thoughtful talent recruitment and retention strategies now if they want to mitigate their impact on their workforce.
The good news is that employees are also aware of, and even catalyzing, these changes. Employees are feeling a heightened sense of responsibility in working with employers to meet their needs. Out of this moment’s challenges comes a rare opportunity to leap to the forefront of the financial industry.
Written by Didi Gurfinkel.
Track Latest News Live on CEOWORLD magazine
and get news updates from the United States and around the world.
The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of the CEOWORLD magazine.
Follow CEOWORLD magazine
on Twitter and
Facebook. For media queries, please contact:
info@ceoworld.biz
Finance jobs can offer practical experience, in a diverse set of roles, for graduates with strong financial and analytical skill sets. Graduates may apply their industry knowledge and explore a broad range of finance careers, Alternative Medicine.
From accountants and economic analysts to other fulfilling career options, such as investment bankers and portfolio managers, the opportunities are limitless.
What’s it like to work in a finance job?
Personal finance, corporate finance, and government finance are widely recognized as the three finance subfields. Other subfields include investments, money and credit markets, and financial management.
Graduates and working professionals can pursue careers in corporate financial management, securities analysis, and commercial lending, along with several other financial career institutions. Finance professionals typically interact with attorneys, accountants, and insurance agents. In the right work setting, both introverts and extroverts can enjoy rewarding financial jobs and long-term careers.
Finance job seekers may seek remote opportunities as financial analysts, financial advisors, accountants, and other offsite career opportunities. Industry professionals may work between 50 and 70 hours per week. Investment bankers may log as many as 70 to 100 weekly hours. Long hours can contribute to burnout.
Salaries range from $61,000 to $137.000 plus. Finance professionals are driven by a lively, exciting, and challenging workplace with advancement opportunities and unlimited career opportunities around the world.
Finance career options
The finance industry is ever-growing for those who possess a finance degree and strong analytical and accounting skills. Explore your finance career options below and check out the best online finance master’s programs.
Accountant
Minimum degree level required: Bachelor’s
Salary expectations: $73,560
Good fit for individuals who:
Are organized professionals
Are skilled at working with numbers
Possess strong analytical skills
Like collaborating with diverse clientele
Are current with accounting trends
Accountants assemble, examine, validate, and organize financial documents. They also monitor the organization’s cash inflow and expenditures and ensure the legalities of financial transactions. Accountants operate with integrity, comply with accounting control procedures, and resolve accounting discrepancies.
Actuary
Minimum degree level required: Bachelor’s
Salary expectations: $111,030
Good fit for individuals who:
Are detailed-oriented professionals
Are organized and self-motivated
Possess strong project management skills
Possess advanced statistical analysis and database manipulation training
Actuaries investigate financial outcomes and risk. They also apply financial theory alongside math and statistical data to examine the uncertainty of events and reduce their organization’s risk. Actuaries assist top executives with preparation for risk management, strategic solutions, and company-wide growth.
Budget analyst
Minimum degree level required: Bachelor’s
Salary expectations: $78,970
Good fit for individuals who:
Possess advanced mathematical and analytical skills
Have strong knowledge of economic trends
Are well-versed in financial markets and banking
Are experienced in resource allocation
Budget analysts prepare income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements. Additionally, budget analysts review the organization’s accounting documents, expenditures, and revenue. Budget analysts oversee payouts, resolve accounting issues, and generate regulatory reports.
Chief financial officer
Minimum degree level required: Bachelor’s
Salary expectations: $137,390
Good fit for individuals who:
Are results-oriented professionals
Possess leadership and team-building skills
Have excellent communication skills
Have cash management, financial accounting, and corporate finance competencies
The chief financial officer (CFO) is the organization’s top-ranking finance executive, balancing expenditures and revenue, monitoring financial planning and analysis, and overseeing the company’s overall fiscal health. Additionally, CFOs manage cash flow along with the organization’s assets, mergers, and funding.
Corporate finance manager
Minimum degree level required: Bachelor’s
Salary expectations: $93,714
Good fit for individuals who:
Have management consultative experience
Possess communication and organizational skills
Are proficient in math
Possess solid technical skills
Corporate finance managers identify the organization’s financial resources, evaluate and forecast financial earnings and risks, and offer investment recommendations. They also guide leadership on achieving targets, generating capital, and preparing legal records.
Credit analyst
Minimum degree level required: Bachelor’s
Salary expectations: $86,170
Good fit for individuals who:
Can communicate effectively with colleagues, superiors, and subordinates
Enjoy collecting and processing data
Like programming and writing software
Can evaluate information
Enjoy gathering information from resources
Credit analysts evaluate prospective borrowers’ eligibility for loan approval and repayment. They also evaluate credit data and financial records and generate reports for credit risk. Credit analysts validate financial and credit operations and collect debt for past due balances.
Economic analyst
Minimum degree level required: Bachelor’s
Salary expectations: $61,322
Good fit for individuals who:
Are organized
Possess analytical thinking and problem-solving skills
Have programming expertise
Possess statistical and database software experience
Economic analysts study economic trends and develop forecasts about the economy. Additionally, economic analysts use their math and programming knowledge to gather financial data and predict financial outcomes. Economic analysts perform microeconomic analyses and determine the best times to invest the organization’s assets.
Financial analyst
Minimum degree level required: Bachelor’s
Salary expectations: $83,660
Good fit for individuals who:
Are analytical and strategic thinkers
Have excellent presentation skills
Are technologically proficient
Are detail-oriented
Financial analysts research business and economic trends, analyze financial records, and define the organization’s value. Financial analysts also explore the organization’s financial projections, weigh the leadership team’s capacity, and propose assortments of investments.
Financial examiner
Minimum degree level required: Bachelor’s
Salary expectations: $81,430
Good fit for individuals who:
Possess strong analytical skills
Are detail-oriented
Are proficient in math, economics, and accounting
Have experience with compliance software
Financial examiners evaluate the organization’s profits and losses along with their assets, equity, and liabilities. Additionally, financial examiners guarantee compliance with governing laws for financial institutions and form guidelines that abide by the most improved and latest regulations. Financial examiners generate reports of the organization’s safety and soundness.
Financial manager
Minimum degree level required: Bachelor’s
Salary expectations: $134,180
Good fit for individuals who:
Are proficient in math
Possess strategic and analytical skills
Have strong oral and written communication skills
Have commercial awareness
Possess problem-solving skills
Financial managers monitor assets of large-scale and small-scale organizations. Additionally, financial managers and their team members manage accounting processes and prepare fiscal reports, cash flow statements, and profit and loss forecasts. Financial managers adhere to laws and regulations and assist employees with understanding the organization’s reports.
Financial planner
Minimum degree level required: Bachelor’s
Salary expectations: $64,993
Good fit for individuals who:
Are knowledgeable about personal finance
Have budgeting and investment experience
Possess analytical skills
Have debt management experience
Financial planners assist clients with investing, retirement savings, and maintaining wealth. These professionals also develop and monitor financial programs for employee benefit packages. Financial planners may specialize in niche areas such as estate planning, risk management, and tax planning.
Insurance agent
Minimum degree level required: Bachelor’s
Salary expectations: $52,180
Good fit for individuals who:
Possess strong customer service skills
Have sales and marketing experience
Possess solid math and critical thinking skills
Are knowledgeable about legal codes and laws
Insurance agents market health, long-term care, life, and property and casualty insurance along with several other insurance types. They also review insurance policies, personalize insurance plans, and maintain policy renewals with new and existing clients.
Investment banker
Minimum degree level required: Bachelor’s
Salary expectations: $101,237
Good fit for individuals who:
Possess analytical and numerical skills
Have interpersonal Skills
Are well-versed in financial markets
Have a background in investment trading
Investment bankers raise capital for an organization’s expansion and improvement efforts. Investment bankers also negotiate mergers, arrange bond offerings, and organize confidential placement of bonds. Investment bankers crunch numbers and effectively communicate with financial institutions.
Loan officer
Minimum degree level required: Bachelor’s
Salary expectations: $63,960
Good fit for individuals who:
Are data-driven and organized
Are accountable and responsive
Possess excellent communication skills
Welcome and encourage questions
Loan officers communicate with applicants to assess their needs for loans. Additionally, loan officers discuss loan options and terms, respond to applicants’ questions, and review financial documentation. Loan officers approve or deny applications, examine loan agreements, and adhere to federal and state regulations.
Management analyst
Minimum degree level required: Bachelor’s
Salary expectations: $87,660
Good fit for individuals who:
Are accounting professionals
Have auditing experience
Possess analytical and communication skills
Have a background in computer systems analysis
Management analysts evaluate financial records such as profits, costs, and employment reports. These professionals also propose organizational changes, methods, and systems. Management analysts interview staff and administer in-person observations to assess the organization’s needs.
Personal finance advisor
Minimum degree level required: Bachelor’s
Salary expectations: $89,330
Good fit for individuals who:
Have a background in accounting and economics
Possess math and analytical skills
Are good at public speaking
Have sales experience
Personal finance advisors communicate with clients and ascertain their income, costs, and insurance coverage while assessing their financial goals and risk tolerance. Additionally, personal finance advisors develop financial plans, oversee clients’ portfolios, and provide cash management and investment planning strategies.
Portfolio manager
Minimum degree level required: Bachelor’s
Salary expectations: $89.286
Good fit for individuals who:
Are leadership Professionals
Are goal-oriented
Possess analytical and quantitative skills
Exhibit initiative
Portfolio managers invest mutual, closed-end funds or exchange traded holdings. They also institute investment plans and monitor daily portfolio trading. Portfolio managers develop investment strategies and determine best times for purchasing and selling assets.
Quantitative analyst
Minimum degree level required: Bachelor’s
Salary expectations: $83,660
Good fit for individuals who:
Are economics and accounting professionals
Possess statistical and complex problem-solving skills
Have expertise in computers and electronics
Are good critical thinkers
Quantitative analysts apply math techniques to assist organizations with business and financial decisions. Quantitative analysts also determine lucrative investment opportunities and minimize risk. Quantitative analysts evaluate cost effectiveness and benefits of the organization’s developments, products, and services.
Risk specialist
Minimum degree level required: Bachelor’s
Salary expectations: $83,660
Good fit for individuals who:
Possess analytical or scientific software skills
Have financial analysis and word processing software skills
Are good problem-solvers and project managers
Pay attention to details
Risk specialists investigate potential risks that could reduce cash flow and increase the organization’s insurance rates. They also develop strategic plans to lessen the organization’s losses. Risk specialists examine financial records, design risk assessment models, and institute contingency plans.
Trader
Minimum degree level required: Bachelor’s
Salary expectations: $131,000
Good fit for individuals who:
Are analytical professionals
Are excellent at product sales
Enjoy working with financial data
Are detail-oriented
Possess solid customer service skills
Traders purchase and sell securities such as stocks and profits to generate revenue. These professionals may work for large-scale investment management firms, banks, or exchanges. Traders are typically hired by hedge funds or partnerships investing in stocks, currencies, and other investment options.
Venture capitalist
Minimum degree level required: Bachelor’s
Salary expectations: $192,525
Good fit for individuals who:
Are detail-oriented
Have excellent decision-making skills
Are excellent notetakers
Have experience in the financial sector
Are proficient in locating new profit opportunities
Venture capitalists supply investments at various stages of the venture process. These professionals are also private equity investors that allocate capital to organizations with strong potential to generate large financial gains. Venture capitalists provide capital for startup companies and small businesses seeking to expand their products and services.