NEW YORK, Dec. 10, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Zoe, a digital wealth platform that connects clients with fiduciary financial advisors, just announced a new partner joining their exclusive advisor Network. Zoe has a rigorous vetting process that ensures that clients are meticulously connected only with wealth managers among the top 5{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} of the country. RIAs that partner with Zoe are characterized by the high-quality, personalized, and unbiased advice they provide to their clients.
To continue transforming the wealth management experience, Zoe recently partnered with Forum Financial Management, an RIA that uses a client-driven, consultative approach to create comprehensive wealth plans that are consistent with each client’s risk tolerance, stage of life, and financial objectives. Forum was named one of the 300 Top RIAs in the country by the 2020Financial Times report.
Forum’s commitment to their clients’ long-term goals is noteworthy. Progress is measured holistically, encompassing both investment account performance alongside evolution towards personal financial goals. Their dedicated team of experienced advisors has decades of experience in wealth management and their personal approach begins with understanding the hopes and dreams each client places in the center of their financial life. Registered in 2009, Forum has helped more than 4,000 clients and managed over $6 billion AUM for them. Clients will now be able to match with Forum Financial advisors through the Zoe Network.
“We believe that holistic wealth management is the best approach to help clients achieve their long-term goals. We are excited to work with the Zoe Financial Network to help more individuals and their families reach their life goals by making better financial decisions,” said Jonathan Rogers, CFP®, Co-Managing Partner at Forum.
“Since we founded Zoe, we’ve committed to connecting clients only with the best advisors in the country. Partnering with RIAs such as Forum Financial Management makes sense, fundamentally, we share the belief that hiring a financial advisor is based on trust, integrity, and confidence. We’re thrilled that clients will now be able to connect and start working with them through our network,” said Andres Garcia-Amaya, Founder & CEO of Zoe Financial about the recent partnership.
Learn more about Zoe at www.zoefin.com.
Learn more about Forum Financial at https://www.forumfin.com/.
About Zoe
Zoe was founded with one mission: to empower consumers to make better financial decisions. The company’s algorithm removes the friction from choosing a financial advisor, offering a technology-driven marketplace that provides matches based on your unique financial objectives and connects you with Zoe Certified Financial Advisors across the United States. Zoe’s thoughtfully curated network of independent, fiduciary, financial advisors and financial planners includes only the top 5{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} in the country.
Related Images
Image 1: Zoe Financial
Zoe Financial
This content was issued through the press release distribution service at Newswire.com.
Broadcom Inc. shares were on track for their best day in more than a year and a half Friday after more than half the analysts covering the chip and software company hiked their price targets on the stock following strong results and big plans to return cash to shareholders.
Broadcom
AVGO, +8.27{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}
shares were last up 7.4{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} at $626.36, after touching an intraday high of $644.75, and were on track for their best performing day since April 6, 2020, when they closed up 7.8{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} at $252.44.
Late Thursday, Broadcom not only topped Wall Street expectations for the quarter and provided a strong outlook but also it announced a $10 billion share buyback it expects to complete in a little more than a year and hiked its dividend 14{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}. With more than $12 billion in cash on the company’s books and growing, Broadcom Chief Executive Hock Tan told analysts, “It’s just a very logical conclusion for us to not just sit on the cash,” given a lack of recent acquisitions from a company that has been heavily into M&A over the past few years.
Back in July, talks to buy software company SAS Institute Inc. fell apart, and the company hasn’t had a big deal since it closed on the acquisition of Symantec’s enterprise security business two years ago following acquisitions of CA Inc. and Brocade in previous years.
Of the 32 analysts who cover Broadcom, 27 have buy ratings, four have hold ratings, and one has a sell rating. Of those, 18 hiked their price targets, resulting in an average target of $664.72, up from a previous $578.93, according to FactSet data.
Bernstein analyst Stacy Rasgon, who has an outperform rating and hiked his price target to $725 from $560, characterized Broadcom’s report as “What’s not to like here?”
“While enjoying solid upside in their core markets the company has high and, potentially, more stable visibility given how they are proactively managing their bookings and demand as they parse their orders to minimize risks of customer stockpiling,” Rasgon said.
“Cash generation and return is stellar, with enough [free cash flow] to still leave M&A on the table even with the sizeable 2022 buyback (a positive in our opinion as we remain partial to their acquisition strategy),” Rasgon said.
See another $10 billion buyback: Oracle’s stock jumps 10{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} on sales, earnings beat
Citi Research analyst Christopher Danley, who has a buy rating and raised his price target to $685 from $585, on the basis that “Broadcom continues to see robust demand for its networking and storage products due to strength from the enterprise and cloud end markets.”
Susquehanna Financial analyst Christopher Rolland, who has a positive rating and a $680 price target, said that while near-term result were “as expected,” the company provided “solid guidance as Networking fires on all cylinders,” while “Cloud and Enterprise to accelerate while 5G rides the tide.”
Additionally, Rolland called the buyback and dividend hike results of how “management scours for a decent use of cash.”
Mizuho analyst Vijay Rakesh, who has a buy rating and a $665 price target, said he was surprised by the $10 billion buyback, but had expected more along the lines of $6 billion to $8 billion.
Jefferies analyst Mark Lipacis, who has a buy rating and hiked his price target to $720 from $590, said he estimates that Broadcom will be “returning greater than 100{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} of net income to shareholders in 2022.”
“AVGO trades a 35{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} discount to SOX, has solid visibility, a 2.8{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} div yield and is entering a capital return cycle,” Lipacis said.
Over the past 12 months, shares of Broadcom have gained 53{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}. In comparison, the S&P 500 index
SPX, +0.95{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}
has advanced 28{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}, the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite Index
COMP, +0.73{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}
has risen 26{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}, while the PHLX Semiconductor Index
SOX, +0.91{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}
has grown 43{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} over that time.
This week saw two key pieces of economic data: the lowest number of jobless claims since September 1969 and the highest inflation since June 1982.
Jared Bernstein, longtime economic aide to President Biden, was keen to drop some trivia on the more flattering number, noting “‘Honky Tonk Woman’ by the Rolling Stones was topping the charts” the last time jobless claims were this low.
What was left unmentioned was that “Ebony and Ivory” was the most popular song the last time inflation was this high. On those price challenges, Bernstein said the wheels are in motion to curb price pressures in the coming months. In fact, he said, gas prices are already down and “we fully expect [these lower prices] to show up in the December report.”
He added that “part of what is happening here is the president asking the Federal Trade Commission to make sure [oil companies] aren’t engaging in any anti-competitive behavior” as well as “the largest ever release from our strategic petroleum reserve.”
President Joe Biden speaks Thursday during a meeting with members of the White House Covid-19 Response Team. (Nicholas Kamm / AFP via Getty Images)
AAA noted this week that gas prices have fallen in recent days to levels not seen since August. It attributed the downward pressure more to COVID-19 and fears of an economic slowdown linked to the omicron variant.
In a statement Friday, Biden also focused on energy prices, saying recent moves “should translate into lower prices for Americans in the months ahead.”
The Labor Department reported that the Consumer Price Index increased 0.8{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} in November adding up to a 6.8{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} increase over last year. Another measure, the so-called core CPI which excludes food and energy prices, jumped by 4.9{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} over last year, also marking the fastest increase in decades.
Republicans were quick to jump on the numbers with the Republican House Ways and Means leader, Rep. Kevin Brady (R., Texas), calling it ”another grim report for American workers and families whose paychecks are shrinking month after month due to President Biden’s inflation-friendly policies.”
A second factor: Supply chains
Easing supply chain logjams will help drive down prices in the coming months, and Biden is “detailing his team to do everything we can to help unsnarl supply chains,” Bernstein told Yahoo Finance.
Bernstein is currently a member of the White House Council of Economic Advisers and has had a long relationship with Biden on economic issues. From 2009 to 2011, he served as the chief economic adviser to then-Vice President Biden during the Obama administration.
The White House’s Port Action Plan, is working and “virtually every forecast I’ve seen has some of these supply chain snarls easing as demand for goods rebalances [and] demand for services come up and that takes pressure off the supply chain and that takes some pressure off of inflation,” he said.
Kroll Institute Global Chief Economist Megan Greene told Yahoo Finance that much of the inflation was indeed caused by pent-up demand for goods, but Friday’s report “says nothing about whether we’re going to continue to buy goods once this pandemic is contained rather than services.”
‘The heart of Bidenomics’
A container ship at the Port of Long Beach waits to be unloaded last week in California. A backlog of aging cargo at the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach has decreased 37 percent since last month. (Mario Tama/Getty Images)
Bernstein returned repeatedly to the most recent jobless claims numbers to celebrate how, in his view, the tight job market is helping “lower-income people have a fair shot at claiming some of the economic growth.”
Wage growth, he said, is “beating inflation by a fair bit.”
“If you look at the lowest-wage workers – the bottom 25{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} – their pace is beating inflation as well,” Bernstein said.
While inflation has eaten deeply into wage gains, economists have found earnings rising the fastest recently for the lowest-paid workers, with the lowest-wage workers beating inflation.
“We have just very, very strong labor demand in this economy and particularly strong for low-wage workers,” said Bernstein. “That is at the heart of Bidenomics.”
Ben Werschkul is a writer and producer for Yahoo Finance in Washington, DC.
US inflation jumps 6.8{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} in November — fastest rate in 39 years
Biden’s $2.2T spending bill ‘likely to boost inflation’ in the short term, economist says
It’s ‘not a quick hit’: Democrats highlight the gradual nature of their spending bills amid inflation worries
Read the latest financial and business news from Yahoo Finance
New York, December 10, 2021 – Moody’s Investors Service has affirmed the Aa2 senior unsecured
debt rating and Prime-1 short-term issuer rating of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (Berkshire, NYSE: BRK)
as well as the ratings on subsidiary debts that are unconditionally and irrevocably guaranteed by
Berkshire (see list below). The rating outlook for Berkshire is stable. RATINGS RATIONALE According to Moody’s, the rating affirmation reflects Berkshire’s extraordinarily well capitalized
(re)insurance operations, its highly diversified earnings and cash flow from regulated and non-
regulated businesses, and its conservative financial policy, by which it maintains of a large liquidity
pool and moderate financial leverage. Partly offsetting these strengths are potential earnings
and capital volatility related to the company’s large, concentrated stock investments and its large
individual (re)insurance transactions. Other challenges include enterprise risk management given
the vast business portfolio, and leadership succession given the critical role CEO Warren Buffett has
played in developing Berkshire’s culture and financial performance. Berkshire reported net operating earnings of $20.2 billion for the first nine months of 2021, up
19{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} versus the prior year period, reflecting strong double-digit increases in the railroad, utilities
and energy, and manufacturing, service and retailing segments, partly offset by a double-digit
decline in the (re)insurance segment. The year-to-date decline in (re)insurance results reflects
lower underwriting income, partly because of higher catastrophe losses, along with slightly lower
investment income. Moody’s expects that Berkshire will benefit from the recovering economy in 2022
and will continue to grow its operating earnings, cash flow and capital base over time. As of September 30, 2021, Berkshire had consolidated cash and equivalents totaling $149 billion, a
majority held within the (re)insurance segment. The company had total borrowings of $115 billion, a
majority issued by the railroad and utilities and energy segments. Consolidated total leverage, which
incorporates all reported debt plus Moody’s adjustments for pensions and leases, was about 20{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} at
September 30, 2021, within Moody’s rating expectations. Berkshire generates healthy pretax interest
coverage, averaging more than 10 times over the past five years. The company holds at least $30
billion of cash and equivalents at or readily available to the parent to address potential needs or
opportunities. FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS Factors that could lead to an upgrade of Berkshire’s ratings include (i) meaningful improvement in
standalone credit profiles of major operating units, and (ii) continued holdings of substantial cash and
equivalents at or readily available to the parent company relative to outstanding indebtedness. Factors that could lead to a rating downgrade include: (i) meaningful deterioration in standalone
credit profiles(s) of one or more major operating units, (ii) a shift towards a less conservative
financial profile (for example, total consolidated leverage exceeding 30{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}, or total leverage excluding
railroad, utilities and energy exceeding 15{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}), (iii) losses from (re)insurance underwriting and/or
investments causing a 15{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} decline in shareholders’ equity in a given year, or (iv) a significant
background image
decline in cash and equivalents at or readily available to the parent (for example, declining toward
$30 billion, which management cites as a minimum balance). Moody’s has affirmed the following ratings: Berkshire Hathaway Inc. — long-term issuer rating and senior unsecured debt at Aa2, senior
unsecured shelf at (P)Aa2, short-term issuer rating at Prime-1; Berkshire Hathaway Finance Corporation — backed senior unsecured debt at Aa2, backed senior
unsecured shelf at (P)Aa2; The Lubrizol Corporation — backed senior unsecured debt at Aa2; Precision Castparts Corp. — backed senior unsecured debt at Aa2. The rating outlook for these companies is stable. The methodologies used in these ratings were Property and Casualty Insurers
Methodology published in September 2021 and available at
. Alternatively, please see the Rating Methodologies page on www.moodys.com
for a copy of these methodologies. Based in Omaha, Nebraska, Berkshire is a holding company engaged through subsidiaries in
diversified businesses that fall into four broad segments: (re)insurance; railroad; utilities and
energy; and manufacturing, service and retailing. Berkshire also holds sizable minority interests in
several publicly traded firms through its portfolio of common stocks, held mainly by its (re)insurance
subsidiaries. Berkshire generated total revenue of $204 billion, net operating earnings of $20.2
billion, and net income attributable to Berkshire of $50.1 billion for the first nine months of 2021.
The main differences between net income and operating earnings are that net income includes
unrealized gains on stock investments plus a smaller amount of realized investment gains. Berkshire
had total assets of $921 billion and Berkshire shareholders’ equity of $472 billion as of September
30, 2021. REGULATORY DISCLOSURES For further specification of Moody’s key rating assumptions and sensitivity analysis, see
the sections Methodology Assumptions and Sensitivity to Assumptions in the disclosure
form. Moody’s Rating Symbols and Definitions can be found at:
https://www.moodys.com/
researchdocumentcontentpage.aspx?docid=PBC_79004
.
For ratings issued on a program, series, category/class of debt or security this announcement
provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or
note of the same series, category/class of debt, security or pursuant to a program for which the
ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody’s rating practices.
For ratings issued on a support provider, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures
in relation to the credit rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular credit
rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider’s credit rating.
For provisional ratings, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the
provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent
to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not
changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would have affected the
background image
rating. For further information please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective
issuer on www.moodys.com. For any affected securities or rated entities receiving direct credit support from the primary entity(ies)
of this credit rating action, and whose ratings may change as a result of this credit rating action, the
associated regulatory disclosures will be those of the guarantor entity. Exceptions to this approach
exist for the following disclosures, if applicable to jurisdiction: Ancillary Services, Disclosure to rated
entity, Disclosure from rated entity. The ratings have been disclosed to the rated entity or its designated agent(s) and issued with no
amendment resulting from that disclosure. These ratings are solicited. Please refer to Moody’s Policy for Designating and Assigning Unsolicited
Credit Ratings available on its website www.moodys.com. Regulatory disclosures contained in this press release apply to the credit rating and, if applicable, the
related rating outlook or rating review. Moody’s general principles for assessing environmental, social and governance (ESG) risks in
The Global Scale Credit Rating on this Credit Rating Announcement was issued by one of Moody’s
affiliates outside the EU and is endorsed by Moody’s Deutschland GmbH, An der Welle 5, Frankfurt
am Main 60322, Germany, in accordance with Art.4 paragraph 3 of the Regulation (EC) No
1060/2009 on Credit Rating Agencies. Further information on the EU endorsement status and on the
Moody’s office that issued the credit rating is available on www.moodys.com. The Global Scale Credit Rating on this Credit Rating Announcement was issued by one of Moody’s
affiliates outside the UK and is endorsed by Moody’s Investors Service Limited, One Canada
Square, Canary Wharf, London E14 5FA under the law applicable to credit rating agencies in the UK.
Further information on the UK endorsement status and on the Moody’s office that issued the credit
rating is available on www.moodys.com. Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to the lead rating analyst and to the
Moody’s legal entity that has issued the rating. Please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for additional regulatory
disclosures for each credit rating. Bruce Ballentine
licensors and affiliates (collectively, “MOODY’S”). All rights reserved. CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS AFFILIATES ARE THEIR CURRENT
OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS,
OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MATERIALS, PRODUCTS, SERVICES AND
INFORMATION PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S (COLLECTIVELY, “PUBLICATIONS”) MAY INCLUDE
SUCH CURRENT OPINIONS. MOODY’S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN
ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME
DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT OR IMPAIRMENT.
SEE APPLICABLE MOODY’S RATING SYMBOLS AND DEFINITIONS PUBLICATION FOR
INFORMATION ON THE TYPES OF CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS ADDRESSED
BY MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE
VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS, NON-CREDIT ASSESSMENTS (“ASSESSMENTS”), AND
OTHER OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS
OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE
QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS
OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S ANALYTICS, INC. AND/OR ITS AFFILIATES.
MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS DO
NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND MOODY’S
CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND
DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR
SECURITIES. MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND
PUBLICATIONS DO NOT COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY
PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY’S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS AND
OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLISHES ITS PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND
UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY
AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE,
HOLDING, OR SALE. MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS, AND PUBLICATIONS
ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS
AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS,
ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS OR PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT
DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER
PROFESSIONAL ADVISER.
background image
ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT
LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR
OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED,
DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR
ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY
MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY’S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS ARE
NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY ANY PERSON AS A BENCHMARK AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED
FOR REGULATORY PURPOSES AND MUST NOT BE USED IN ANY WAY THAT COULD RESULT
IN THEM BEING CONSIDERED A BENCHMARK. All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY’S from sources believed by it to be
accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other
factors, however, all information contained herein is provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind.
MOODY’S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit
rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY’S considers to be reliable including, when
appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY’S is not an auditor and cannot
in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in
preparing its Publications. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents,
representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect,
special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection
with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if
MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers
is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to:
(a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant
financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY’S. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents,
representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses
or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but
excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt,
by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of,
MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers,
arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use
any such information. NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS,
COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF
ANY CREDIT RATING, ASSESSMENT, OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE
BY MOODY’S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER. Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s
Corporation (“MCO”), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and
municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody’s
Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any credit rating, agreed to pay to Moody’s
Investors Service, Inc. for credit ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees ranging from
$1,000 to approximately $5,000,000. MCO and Moody’s Investors Service also maintain policies
and procedures to address the independence of Moody’s Investors Service credit ratings and credit
rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO
and rated entities, and between entities who hold credit ratings from Moody’s Investors Service and
background image
have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}, is posted
annually at
www.moodys.com
under the heading “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance —
Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy.” Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the
Australian Financial Services License of MOODY’S affiliate, Moody’s Investors Service Pty Limited
ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody’s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136
972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to “wholesale
clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access
this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY’S that you are, or are accessing
the document as a representative of, a “wholesale client” and that neither you nor the entity you
represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to “retail clients” within
the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY’S credit rating is an opinion as
to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or
any form of security that is available to retail investors. Additional terms for Japan only: Moody’s Japan K.K. (“MJKK”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency
subsidiary of Moody’s Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody’s Overseas Holdings Inc.,
a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody’s SF Japan K.K. (“MSFJ”) is a wholly-owned credit rating
agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization
(“NRSRO”). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-
NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated
obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit
rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers
are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively. MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including
corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated
by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any credit rating, agreed to pay to
MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for credit ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees ranging
from JPY125,000 to approximately JPY550,000,000. MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory
The hottest U.S. consumer inflation reading in almost 40 years is bringing a surprising sigh of relief in certain corners of the financial markets, where some were expecting a headline year-over-year number closer to 7{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}.
The relief was evident in investors’ appetite for U.S. Treasuries Friday morning after the government’s consumer price index report, which showed the headline year-on-year reading at 6.8{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} for November. While undoubtedly high, the reading dodged the 7{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} level that a few saw as a risk, raising hope that inflation may be in the process of topping out.
Read: Traders see next U.S. CPI reading close to 7{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} as volatile markets try to shake off omicron and Federal Reserve’s hawkish pivot
While the CPI print was high, “some folks on Wall Street were expecting an even higher number” and the core CPI number, which excludes volatile items, “was in line with expectations,” said Tim Holland, chief investment officer of Orion Advisor Solutions.
“The two points above have many thinking that we are close to, if not at, peak inflation,” Holland wrote in an e-mail to MarketWatch. “That strikes us as a reasonable view, which would point us towards lower inflation going forward, which would support / justify little to no movement in yields.”
Want intel on all the news moving markets? Sign up for our daily Need to Know newsletter. Use this link to subscribe.
Fixed income tends to be the asset class that gets hit hardest by rising inflation, which erodes the fixed value of bonds. Ordinarily, investors would be selling off Treasuries in response to a higher inflation print, which would lead to higher yields. Instead, ongoing demand for U.S. government debt, whether domestically or from abroad, pushed bond prices higher and yields lower Friday, as investors turn their attention to next Wednesday’s policy update from the Federal Reserve.
On Friday, yields fell across the curve, with the exception of 1-month and 2-month bill rates. The 10-year yield
TMUBMUSD10Y, 1.478{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}
slipped to around 1.45{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} and the 30-year
TMUBMUSD30Y, 1.872{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}
dropped to 1.84{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}, remaining near historically low levels.
Surprisingly, the 2-year yield, which reflects expectations for the near-term path of Fed policy, fell by the most, to around 0.64{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} which is still not far from the highest levels of the year. The move is counterintuitive because investors are expecting the Fed to proceed with a faster pace of tapering bond purchases, in order to have greater flexibility to hike interest rates sooner next year and combat inflation.
Meanwhile, equity investors brushed off the inflation print at first before all three U.S. stock benchmark indexes started giving up their earlier gains.
Gennadiy Goldberg, a senior US rates strategist for TD Securities, says the market pays less attention to the headline year-on-year figure than it does to the monthly numbers. “Yields are declining because month-over-month inflation didn’t come in as high as expected, and a lot of Fed tightening has already been priced in — with almost three rate hikes expected for 2022,” Goldberg said via phone.
“If you look at the long end and the pricing for rates in overnight-indexed swaps, the long-run terminal rate is just 1.5{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996},” below the 2.5{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} seen by Fed officials in September, he said. “That’s an indication that the market could be penciling in some policy error.”
Employees at a Buffalo-area Starbucks store have voted to form a union, making it the only one of the nearly 9,000 company-owned stores in the United States to be organized and notching an important symbolic victory for labor at a time when workers across the country are expressing frustration with wages and working conditions.
The result, announced on Thursday by the National Labor Relations Board, represents a major challenge to the labor model at the giant coffee retailer, which has argued that its workers enjoy some of the best wages and benefits in the retail and restaurant industry and don’t need a union.
The union was leading in an election at another store, but by a margin smaller than the number of ballots the union was seeking to disqualify through challenges. The challenges must be resolved by the labor agency’s regional director in the coming days or weeks before there is a result. Workers at a third store voted against unionizing, according to the board, though a union lawyer contended that some ballots had been delivered to the agency and not counted.
“Although it’s a small number of workers, the result has huge symbolic importance and symbols are important when it comes to union organizing,” John Logan, a labor studies professor at San Francisco State University, said in an email. “Workers who want to form a union in the United States are forced to take a considerable amount of risk, and it helps if they can see others who have taken that risk and it has paid off.”
The unionized employees, who are joining Workers United, an affiliate of the giant Service Employees International Union, received inquiries throughout the campaign from Starbucks workers across the country who said they were paying close attention and were interested in unionizing as well.
“I don’t think it will stop in Buffalo, whatsoever,” Alexis Rizzo, a worker at one of the stores and a leader in the organizing campaign, said at a news conference after the vote.
Workers cited frustration over understaffing and insufficient training when they filed for union elections at the stores in late August, problems that have dogged the company for years but which appeared to worsen during the pandemic. Such problems are not unique to Starbucks and have been problems for workers across the restaurant and retail industries for many years.
“We continue on as we did today, yesterday and the day before that,” Rossann Williams, Starbucks’s president of retail for North America, said in a letter to employees after the vote. “The vote outcomes will not change our shared purpose or how we will show up for each other.”
The election occurred through mail ballots that were due Wednesday. In November, workers at three more Buffalo-area stores filed the paperwork needed to hold union elections, but it was unclear when votes would take place for those outlets.
Starbucks responded to the union campaign with a sense of urgency. Throughout the fall, out-of-town managers and executives — even Ms. Williams — converged on stores in Buffalo, where they questioned employees about operational challenges and assisted in menial tasks like cleaning bathrooms.
In a video of a meeting in September viewed by The New York Times, a district manager from Arizona told co-workers that the company had asked her to go to Buffalo to help “save it” from unionization.
Several workers who support the union said they found the presence of these officials intimidating and, at times, surreal. They also complained that Starbucks had temporarily closed certain stores in the area, which they found disruptive, and said Starbucks had excessively added staff in at least one of the three stores that held elections. The workers said this had diluted support for unionization at the store.
“As of today we’ve done it in spite of everything that the company has thrown at us and we all know it has been an extensive anti-union campaign by Starbucks corporate,” Michelle Eisen, a barista at the Buffalo location that unionized who also helped lead the campaign, said at the news conference.
Former National Labor Relations Board officials have said that these actions by the company could be interpreted as undermining the “laboratory conditions” that are supposed to prevail during union elections and that they could serve as grounds for throwing out a result. Workers involved in the union campaign and a union lawyer indicated that they might challenge the result at the store where workers voted down the union.
A regional director of the labor board recently overturned a union election at an Amazon warehouse in Alabama on similar grounds.
Starbucks has said that it dispatched out-of-town officials and temporarily closed stores to help solve staffing and training problems and to remodel stores to make them more efficient. The company said that it added staff to deal with an increase in the number of workers calling in sick and that it had taken such steps across the country since the spring, when coronavirus infection rates dropped and stores became busier.
Ms. Williams, the North America president, said in an interview on Wednesday from Buffalo that she did not feel that the run-up to the vote had been especially contentious and that she had spent much of her time there this fall listening to employees (partners, in the company’s words) and addressing “the conditions that partners had pointed out.”
The key issue at the store whose vote was unresolved, near the Buffalo airport, was whether several workers who cast ballots were actually employed at the store. The union argues that they were employed at another store in the area and worked at the airport store for only a short period of time. The company said they were eligible to vote under the labor board’s rules.
The outcome could be important for determining the union’s leverage when it seeks to negotiate a contract. Under the law, an employer is obligated to bargain with a union in good faith, but there is no requirement that it actually agree to a contract, and the consequences of failing to bargain in good faith are limited.
“The incentives to resist bargaining are significant for the employer,” said Kate Andrias, a labor law expert at Columbia Law School. “If workers are able to win a good contract, it sets a precedent.”
Professor Andrias said that the ability to win a contract in such situations often hinged on the amount of economic pressure the union can exert, and that having a second unionized store could help in this regard.
Ms. Eisen, the worker at the store that unionized, said at the news conference that the workers would like to “offer the olive branch to the company and say, ‘Let’s put this behind us.’” She added: “Now is the time, let’s get to the bargaining table as quickly as possible.”
Starbucks has faced other union campaigns over the years, including one in New York City in the 2000s and one in 2019 in Philadelphia, where it fired two employees involved in organizing, a move that a labor board judge found unlawful. The company appealed the ruling and a decision is still pending.
Neither of those campaigns succeeded, but workers are unionized at Starbucks stores owned by other companies that operate them under licensing agreements. And workers at a company-owned store in Canada recently unionized.
A handful of the company’s early stores in Seattlehad a union and were represented by the United Food and Commercial Workers in the 1980s. The union was decertified.