Companies prepare for a ‘selective decoupling’ with China

The Asia-primarily based taking care of associate of a person of the world’s premier law companies last week established out what he reckoned was the prevailing tale of overseas business enterprise in China in the closing quarter of 2021. Company shoppers are spooked by a selection of factors, he said, including that international provide chains established around the past two many years are in unparalleled flux and the operative term in boardrooms is “decoupling”.

Nonsense, I was told a working day afterwards by an ebullient Asia supremo of one particular of the world’s major expense banking institutions. Regardless of what souring geopolitics or white-knuckle regulatory uncertainties might afflict the tech and residence sectors, Beijing stays basically supportive of personal organization. The possibilities of a demand from customers-pushed sector this buoyant stay considerably as well massive to shun. Corporate shoppers, he claimed, are possibly expanding their investment in China, or, for all those that blenched all through the 2018 opening salvos of the US-China trade war, girding on their own to “re-couple” before the chance is missing.

So which to think? Or, if both equally are appropriate now, which will continue to be right in a year’s time?

Plainly, we have entered superior year for divergent or conflicting China narrative-creating. A current paper from the College of California San Diego will make a courageous attempt to unravel the paradoxes of what it phone calls the “uneasy coexistence of financial decoupling with business enterprise-as-typical observed in the present-day period of the US-China trade war”. Its results, say the authors, help explain why the anecdotal proof on true decoupling and divestment is so mixed. For observers and traders inclined to hedge, lots of have started to predict an period of “selective decoupling” as the terrain gets clearer.

For now, at least, the two versions are at the same time powerful for the reason that every is carried together on the exact torrent of newsflow and chatter. Even solitary voices, these types of as that of US commerce secretary Gina Raimondo, deliver equally sides with ammunition. In late September, she informed reporters that there was “no level in talking about decoupling”, simply because both the US and China wished entry to each other’s overall economy. In a separate interview the similar working day, she bemoaned China’s ripping-off of American mental property and stated that if the US genuinely needed to sluggish down China’s “rate of innovation”, it needed to get the job done a lot more closely with non-Chinese allies, this sort of as Europe.

The banker’s take is that huge international firms will continue on to invest in China though its marketplaces deliver substantially of their advancement, and are doing so with extensive-term sights. In 2020, 27 for every cent of European businesses with a joint undertaking in China enhanced their stake 18 per cent took a managing share. They experience considerably much less formal corruption than they utilised to and for quite a few the economic calculation is simpler than before. For makers of client or luxury goods, he claimed, the lesson of the pandemic has been to establish producing inside of China or possibility losing profits. If the reshaping of China’s own manufacturing offer chain involves foreign suppliers to adapt and make investments, he suggests, many will do so even so acute the regulatory or political chance may possibly feel.

At the rear of the lawyer’s narrative is a counterpoint, supported by the ever much more fiddly and price-inducing get the job done he is accomplishing for clientele, that tiny is increasing for foreign businesses in China — specifically producers. Forced tech transfers are a big headache. A latest study of European providers uncovered a 3rd anticipating that China’s evolving cyber protection law, information stability regulation and the personal information protection regulation would have a “sizeable negative impact” on their organization in the next 5 decades.

In the meantime, the vast-angle image of decoupling, which the FT has individually heard explained by executives across the semiconductor, autos and telecoms industries, is that the most reasonable technique is to approach as if it is happening. If protection fears and the fostering of countrywide champions in semiconductors and other source chain choke points persists, quite a few companies need to adapt to a decoupled actuality, mentioned one Japanese CEO in the semiconductor business.

For now, at minimum, say bankers, legal professionals, teachers and traders, the “selective decoupling” narrative could have to do. But we might, at minimum, have a clean way of checking that narrative as it plays out. Japan’s appointment past week of its 1st minister for economic protection could have appeared a wide conquer but it is, say political analysts, a tacit admission that the engagement of international enterprises with China is now a significant enough deal to need its very own department of federal government to oversee.

leo.lewis@ft.com

Working for companies owned by well-heeled private-equity firms can mean lower wages for employees

Alma Jordan, a certified nursing assistant at the Marcella Center nursing home in Burlington, N.J., respected the residents she cared for there over the past 16 years. They were like family, she said, and she believes they’ve appreciated her attentiveness, especially during Covid.

Not so, the nursing home’s new owner, Jordan said. After Complete Care Management, the largest for-profit nursing home operator in New Jersey, took over the 150-bed Marcella Center in April, it slashed worker benefits, she and other employees as well as a representative from their union told NBC News.

Amid the pandemic, Jordan’s paid holidays were reduced and her monthly health insurance costs more than tripled, she said. The company stopped contributing to the employee pension, replacing it with a 401k plan that had no employer match or contribution. Complete Care took away vision insurance and stopped a reimbursement program covering employee education costs, so Jordan, 45, won’t be able to recoup money she spent working toward a degree to become a licensed practical nurse.

“I put all my effort into this company and someone else took over and they don’t want to give us what we deserve,” Jordan told NBC News. “For them it’s business, it’s not about the staff and the residents. It’s only about making profits.”

Alma Jordan, center left, in blue, at a picket against nursing home operator Complete Care over its changing practices that reduced employee benefits.1199SEIU United Healthcare Workers East

In late September, Jordan quit her position at the facility. The reduced benefits and deteriorating work conditions got to be too much, she said.

When Complete Care came in, Jordan and other Marcella workers were operating under a union contract struck with the facility’s previous owner. Complete Care did away with that contract, which also covered four other unionized New Jersey nursing facilities it recently acquired, according to the Service Employees International Union.

Complete Care owns 61 facilities in eight states, including Connecticut, Maryland and Wisconsin. It is backed by a private-equity firm called Peace Capital in Lakewood, N.J. whose principal owner is Sam Stein.

Jordan and her fellow workers are not alone in experiencing reduced circumstances after their company is taken over by a private-equity firm. The new titans of finance, these firms use large pools of debt — typically raised in what’s called the leveraged loan market — to acquire companies they hope to resell in a few years at a profit. Among companies raising money in this loan market during the past three years, debt levels at private-equity-backed entities were at least 30 percent higher than debt levels at companies not backed by private equity, according to LCD, a unit of S&P Global Market Intelligence.

But the heavy debt loads they take on, combined with pressure to flip acquired companies quickly, increases the likelihood that private-equity firms will have to cut costs in the operations that they buy. Often, the first to the chopping block is the company’s workforce.

A 2019 study by the National Bureau of Economic Research lays this out. Researchers analyzed almost 10,000 debt-fueled buyouts between 1980 and 2013 and found that employment fell by 13 percent when a private-equity firm took over a public company. Employment declined by even more — 16 percent — when private equity acquired a unit or division of a company.

Eileen Appelbaum is an economist and co-director at the Center for Economic and Policy Research, a progressive think tank, and co-author of Private Equity at Work: When Wall Street Manages Main Street. Her study of private equity has led her to conclude that the industry’s growing clout is not only a concern for workers, but also has the potential to harm the nation’s broader economy.

“You have a lot more ownership of productive resources by investors who don’t know an industry, don’t understand the value of skilled workers and who are just in it to make their profit and get out,” said Appelbaum. “That erodes productivity.”

Almost 12 million employees, or roughly 7 percent of the U.S. labor force, work for private-equity backed businesses, according to the American Investment Council, an industry lobbying group. These companies generated about 6.5 percent of the nation’s gross domestic product last year, the group said.

The Council says private-equity firms create jobs, support businesses, and help provide comfortable retirements for pensioners invested in the strategy.

A spokeswoman for Complete Care echoed this view. She said the company is committed to the long-term viability of its facilities, adding in a statement: “We offer a comprehensive health plan and competitive benefits, and our facilities are known as great places to work.” The company is negotiating a new union contract, the spokeswoman said.

Meanwhile, though, care at the Marcella facility is declining, Jordan said, days after she quit. “We were very short-staffed,” she added. “And I think the residents pick up on that because it takes longer to answer a call.”

In a statement, a spokesperson for Complete Care said, “Complete Care at Marcella consistently maintains state mandated ratios. … We take whatever measures necessary to ensure that we have proper staffing to meet the needs of those in our care, including bringing in agency staff and offering bonuses as needed.”

Alma Jordan. José A. Alvarado Jr. for NBC News

Taxed less than a teacher

Private equity is a sophisticated investment strategy that has grown furiously in recent years. At the end of last year, assets under management at the firms worldwide stood at $5 trillion, up from $1.5 trillion over the past decade, according to Preqin, a financial data provider. The number of funds devoted to these activities has more than doubled during that period and last year, private-equity firms paid some $600 billion to acquire companies, up from $250 billion 10 years earlier.

Private-equity firms began their climb to power in the 1980s; then they were known as leveraged buyout shops, because of the debt they use. The $25 billion buyout of RJR Nabisco in 1988 by private-equity giant Kohlberg Kravis & Roberts brought such deals to center stage.

In recent years, as prevailing interest rates collapsed, private-equity operations have been able to take on greater amounts of low-cost debt to make their acquisitions. Through Sept. 27, for example, $472 billion of leveraged loans were issued, up from $237 billion issued during the same period in 2019, according to LCD of S&P Global.

Outside investors, such as public pension funds and endowments, pour money into these takeover deals in the hopes of generating high returns. But recently, as the stock market has roared, outsized returns in private equity have all but vanished, academic studies show, and are now in line with overall market performance.

Nevertheless, more companies are owned by private-equity firms now than trade on the nation’s stock exchanges.

Not surprisingly, private-equity firms’ rising dominance has generated immense wealth for their executives. The value of Sam Stein’s holdings in Complete Care could not be determined and the company declined to provide it, but it is almost certainly dwarfed by those of Stephen Schwarzman, head of Blackstone Group. A close advisor to Donald Trump during his presidency, Schwartzman is worth $35 billion according to Forbes Magazine, up from $15 billion in 2020.

President Donald Trump and Stephen Schwarzman, co-founder and chief executive officer of Blackstone Group LP, at the White House on Feb. 3, 2017.Andrew Harrer / Bloomberg via Getty Images file

Private equity also benefited from recent government interventions related to the Covid pandemic, documents show. At least $5 billion in federal bailout money went to companies backed by large and well-capitalized private-equity firms, according to a recent report from Americans for Financial Reform.

Last year, the Federal Reserve Board launched an unprecedented $750 billion program to prop up the corporate bond market where many of these firms raise money for their buyouts. Among the bonds purchased by the Fed, documents show, were those issued by Blackstone and another private-equity giant Apollo Global Management, founded by Leon Black.

Gary Gensler, the chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, recently testified that the agency would increase its scrutiny on fee disclosures and conflicts of interest among private funds, to ensure that their practices don’t put investors in these strategies at a disadvantage. And Lina Kahn, the new chairwoman of the Federal Trade Commission, said in a late September memo outlining the agency’s priorities that “the growing role of private equity” invites an examination of how these firms’ business models “may facilitate unfair methods of competition and consumer protection violations.”

Finally, the Democrats’ proposed tax increase on capital gains may crimp private-equity executives’ earnings. A key reason many of these executives have been able to amass such fortunes is that so much of their earnings are taxed as capital gains with a top rate of 20 percent, not at the higher 37 percent rate that can apply to income. This is a benefit they’ve tapped for decades, often allowing them to pay a lower tax rate on earnings than a secretary or a teacher might.

7,800 signatures

One of the nation’s biggest private-equity employers is Roark Capital of Atlanta, Ga. It owns Inspire Brands, parent company to an array of fast-food chains that includes Arby’s, Dunkin’ Donuts and Baskin Robbins, Cinnabon, Seattle’s Best Coffee and Sonic Corp.

NBC News estimates that more than 700,000 people work at Inspire Brands, many at independently owned franchise stores.

Roark is named for the libertarian protagonist in “The Fountainhead” by Ayn Rand, whose life “exemplified the qualities of independence and integrity,” the company’s website says.

One of libertarianism’s basic tenets is limited government, but three dozen companies owned by Roark obtained $183 million in federal assistance under the CARES Act, according to the Americans for Financial Reform report. Asked whether this acceptance of government funding ran counter to a limited government stance, Roark declined to comment through a spokeswoman.

Zella Roberts worked as a carhop at a Sonic drive-in to help pay tuition while she was a student.Courtesy Zella Roberts

Zella Roberts, a recent graduate of Warren Wilson College in Asheville, N.C., worked as a carhop at a Sonic drive-in earlier this year to help pay tuition. Her all-in pay plummeted during the pandemic, Roberts told NBC News, because customers’ cash usage fell and Sonic did not allow tips on credit cards.

Roberts told NBC News that she and some colleagues sent an email to Roark Capital “explaining the conditions that Sonic workers experience. The big ask was to put pressure on Sonic corporate to make these changes.” She said she never heard back about that or other messages sent to Neal Aronson, managing partner and founder of Roark Capital. Aronson is the controlling owner of Roark, regulatory filings show, which has $18.6 billion in assets under management.

Through a spokeswoman, Aronson declined to comment.

In January, after Roberts had collected 7,800 signatures on a petition asking Roark to change its policy, the company allowed tips on credit card orders placed through its app. An improvement, Roberts acknowledged, but such orders are a small percentage of those made via credit cards, she pointed out.

The Inspire Brands spokesman said barring tips on credit cards “is a technology limitation that we inherited when we purchased the brand” in 2018. “We are now working on implementing the credit card tipping capability,” he said.

Inspire Brands has also worked to battle the Raise the Wage Act, which has been introduced in Congress every year since 2017 and would increase the federal minimum wage to $15 an hour among workers like Roberts. In March, Inspire sent a memo to franchise owners highlighting its lobbying success in opposing the change. Describing its efforts, Inspire said: “If you don’t have a seat at the table, you’re on the menu, and you can guarantee your opponents are eating!”

Chris Fuller, a spokesman for Inspire Brands, said the company fought the national minimum wage legislation because “we don’t support a one-size-fits-all approach to the minimum wage. We believe in letting the local markets dictate.” He added: “More than 90 percent of our team members at corporate-owned restaurants are above the state or local minimum wage.”

Some Inspire Brands workers have taken matters into their own hands. This summer, Matthew Honeycutt, 18, was working at an Arby’s in Charlotte, N.C., making $9.50 an hour as a shift manager. He supports an 8-month old son.

Matthew Honeycutt worked at an Arby’s in Charlotte, N.C., where he and his coworkers went on strike for higher pay.Courtesy Matthew Honeycutt

On July 20, he and a group of workers walked off the job seeking a pay raise, forcing managers to close the Arby’s store two hours early, Honeycutt said.

That got management’s attention, he said. “The strike was on a Tuesday and it was about Thursday when he started getting the raises out,” Honeycutt said of his boss, who gave him a 50-cents-an hour raise. “Every kind of worker you can think of is working so hard but they’re not getting paid what they’re worth.”

Honeycutt’s boss did not respond to a voice mail message seeking comment. In mid-September, Honeycutt quit his job at Arby’s for a higher-paying position elsewhere.

While Inspire Brands fights against a higher minimum wage, some other restaurant companies owned by publicly traded companies are taking a different approach. They say increasing worker pay is good for business.

In February, Robert Verostek, the chief financial officer of restaurant chain Denny’s, told investors that paying a higher wage to its workers in California’s had resulted in “not just positive sales, but positive guest traffic.”

And in May, McDonald’s began increasing pay by 10 percent for almost 37,000 workers in company-owned stores. Shift managers like Honeycutt, who earned $10 at Arby’s, are earning between $15 and $20 an hour depending on the location, McDonald’s said.

Sean Dunlop, an equity analyst at Morningstar Research, said Inspire Brands is a well-managed company. But increasing pay and benefits among workers is an industry trend it won’t be able to resist.

“As you’re thinking about bigger chains, not only are they making a broader push to a $15 average wage at restaurants, you’ve also seen them offer tuition assistance, paid time off, retention bonuses and referral bonuses as they’ve been trying to attract workers,” Dunlop said in an interview. “Inspire Brands, if they want to compete, are going to be forced to raise wages. They’re going to have to, whether they want to or not.”

Should You Consider Investing in Markel Corporation (MKL)?

Vltava Fund, an investment decision administration firm, posted its third-quarter 2021 trader letter – a duplicate of which can be downloaded here. In its Q3 investor letter, Vltava Fund described the two businesses they not long ago owned and delivered some updates about the fund’s assets as of the close of the recent quarter. You can view the fund’s prime 5 holdings to have a peek at their top rated bets for 2021.

In the Q3 2021 trader letter of Vltava Fund, the management business stated Markel Company (NYSE: MKL) and mentioned its stance on the firm. Markel Corporation is a Glen Allen, Virginia-based mostly coverage corporation with a $16.8 billion industry capitalization. MKL shipped an 18.78{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} return considering that the commencing of the year, even though its 12-thirty day period returns are up by 24.99{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}. The inventory shut at $1,227.23 for every share on Oct 5, 2021.

Right here is what Vltava Fund has to say about Markel Company in its Q3 2021 investor letter:

“It is intriguing that whilst Berkshire Hathaway’s organization product is essentially quite simple, makes fantastic success, and has been in the general public eye for many years, virtually no 1 has managed to replicate it. The implementation of this idea is seemingly really complicated. In reality, the sole business that has been mostly successful in next Berkshire’s footsteps is Markel Corporation. Its foundation is similarly a thriving and very successful insurance plan company that creates free cash for additional investments into each community and non-community shares in blend with exemplary asset allocation.

A lot of the credit rating for this goes to its co-CEO, Tom Gayner. Markel was originally a household small business launched in 1930 by the Markel household. Tom Gayner arrived on to the scene in 1990, when he took in excess of the financial investment component of Markel, and because 2016 he has held the placement of co-CEO alongside Richard White. Tom Gayner is to start with and foremost an exceptional trader and asset allocator. At Markel, he is presently in cost of a USD 28 billion expenditure portfolio, as nicely as the component that invests in non-public firms and goes by the name Markel Ventures. He has been instrumental in driving the inventory price tag from USD 10 to USD 1,200 through his tenure. That is about the exact same proportion increase that Berkshire’s shares experienced around the very same period of time.

Tom Gayner, and without a doubt Markel as a whole, is a fine example of the truth that you do not will need to invent one thing new, to come up with some innovation, or to try out and disrupt some thing in buy to thrive in the globe of finance. To triumph, it is sufficient to use matters and practices that have been demonstrated over the many years. But it undoubtedly is not simple. Markel has one particular undeniable edge above Berkshire, and that is its a lot smaller sizing. The very long-phrase probable of the corporation in the palms of Tom Gayner and his colleagues stays enormous.”

Pixabay/General public Domain

Dependent on our calculations, Markel Company (NYSE: MKL) was not in a position to clinch a place in our record of the 30 Most Preferred Shares Amid Hedge Money. MKL was in 33 hedge fund portfolios at the end of the first 50 percent of 2021, when compared to 30 cash in the past quarter. Markel Company (NYSE: MKL) shipped a -1.57{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} return in the earlier 3 months.

Hedge funds’ reputation as shrewd investors has been tarnished in the final ten years as their hedged returns could not preserve up with the unhedged returns of the marketplace indices. Our research has proven that hedge funds’ small-cap inventory picks managed to beat the industry by double digits on a yearly basis among 1999 and 2016, but the margin of outperformance has been declining in recent yrs. Even so, we ended up continue to capable to identify in progress a decide on group of hedge fund holdings that outperformed the S&P 500 ETFs by 115 percentage points due to the fact March 2017 (see the facts here). We were also equipped to establish in advance a find group of hedge fund holdings that underperformed the market place by 10 proportion points yearly between 2006 and 2017. Curiously the margin of underperformance of these shares has been growing in the latest yrs. Investors who are prolonged the sector and short these shares would have returned a lot more than 27{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} on a yearly basis amongst 2015 and 2017. We have been monitoring and sharing the checklist of these stocks due to the fact February 2017 in our quarterly newsletter.

At Insider Monkey, we scour many resources to uncover the future fantastic investment plan. For illustration, artificial intelligence is one of the fastest-rising industries right now, so we are checking out inventory pitches like this emerging AI inventory. We go by lists like the 10 best hydrogen fuel cell shares to pick the up coming Tesla that will provide a 10x return. Even although we recommend positions in only a tiny portion of the providers we analyze, we look at out as several shares as we can. We examine hedge fund investor letters and hear to inventory pitches at hedge fund conferences. You can subscribe to our cost-free every day publication on our homepage.

Disclosure: None. This report is originally released at Insider Monkey.

CNBC ranks the top-rated financial advisory firms of 2021

Finding the right financial advisor to help with your financial needs and goals can be complicated.

There are so many things to consider. Every financial advisor has his or her own area of expertise. The services provided by financial advisors will vary based on the type of advisor, but overall, a financial advisor will assess your current financial situation — including your assets, debts and expenses — and identify areas for improvement.

A good financial advisor will ask you about your goals and create a plan to help you reach them. That may mean discussing your budget, retirement planning, estate planning, insurance needs or tax strategies.

An advisor can play a major role in helping clients grow and protect their wealth. The key is to find an advisor you trust, and it’s important to make sure he or she is someone who is a good match for you.

For the third year in a row, CNBC unveils its ranking of top financial advisors. The CNBC FA 100 recognizes those advisory firms that best help clients navigate their financial lives.

More from FA 100:
Meet the financial advisor ranked No. 1 by CNBC
Here’s how we determine the FA 100 rankings for 2021
How the pandemic has changed the financial advice business
Here’s how top financial advisors are hiring young talent

2021 RANK FIRM TOTAL AUM YEARS IN THE BUSINESS ACCOUNTS UNDER MANAGEMENT 2020 RANK 2019 RANK
1 Dana Investment Advisors $7.3B 41 1,163 2 3
2 Salem Investment Counselors $2.6B 42 2,239 1 1
3 NewSouth Capital Management $3.7B 36 190 3 6
4 Check Capital Management $1.6B 35 1,684 12 52
5 Richard C. Young & Co. $1.3B+ 32 1,860 10 10
6 Gofen & Glossberg $6.3B+ 89 3,500 13 15
7 California Financial Advisors $1.6B+ 23 2,901 9 7
8 North Star Asset Management $2.1B+ 25 2,374 14 5
9 Heritage Investors Management $3.4B 47 1,300
10 Tom Johnson Investment Management $1.6B 38 4,998 8 9
11 Beacon Capital Management $4.2B+ 21 15,427 24
12 Bowen, Hanes & Co. $3.5B+ 40 212 28 98
13 Mason Investment Advisory Services $10.6B+ 39 800 100
14 D.F. Dent & Co. $10.7B 46 1,155 18 20
15 Gillespie, Robinson & Grimm $1.5B 51 710 26 32
16 Pzena Investment Management $41.1B+ 25 222 27 34
17 Woodley Farra Manion $1.2B 26 998 19
18 RNC Genter Capital Management $5.8B 54 10,700 30
19 Parsons Capital Management $1.6B+ 27 1,608 16 37
20 ZWJ Investment Counsel $3B 39 900 34 39
21 David Vaughan Investments $3.2B+ 27 2,823 33 46
22 Luther King Capital Management $25B 42 3,100 25 24
23 Gamble Jones Investment Counsel $1.6B+ 64 1,200 15 12
24 Heritage Investment Group $1.3B+ 28 1,836 32 42
25 Carret Asset Management $3.3B+ 58 2,350 23 14
26 Edgemoor Investment Advisors $1.2B+ 22 730 40
27 Clifford Swan Investment Counselors $4B 106 903 55 58
28 Eubel Brady & Suttman Asset Management $1.2B+ 27 1,591 31 36
29 Zemenick & Walker $2.2B+ 34 223 36 30
30 Everett Harris & Co. $8.9B+ 51 1,590 21 44
31 Southeast Asset Advisors $2.9B+ 26 973 41 26
32 Guyasuta Investment Advisors $1.9B+ 38 1,200 43 18
33 Leavell Investment Management $2.2B 42 700+ 48 38
34 H.M. Payson & Co. $6B 167 3,400 53 43
35 Anchor Capital Advisors $9.7B 38 1,114 83 65
36 Zevenbergen Capital Investments $5.7B 34 161 37
37 Hahn Capital Management $1.2B+ 33 105 38 86
38 The Burney Company $2.4B+ 47 4,233 47 53
39 Azzad Asset Management $1.3B 24 2,990
40 Roffman Miller Wealth Management $2B 30 1,150 56 29
41 Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas Asset Management $4.6B+ 30 4,708 69
42 Loring, Wolcott & Coolidge Fiduciary Advisors $10.5B+ 21 3,054 42 27
43 Equius Partners $1.1B 37 1,097 39
44 Bradley, Foster & Sargent $4.1B+ 26 1,514 45 31
45 Pinnacle Associates $7.3B 37 4,000 79
46 RZH Advisors $1.4B+ 21 354
47 Veritable $18B 17 218 46 25
48 Lee Financial $1.2B 46 400 65 40
49 Halbert Hargrove Global Advisors $2.7B+ 32 3,900 61 66
50 Albion Financial Group $1.5B+ 39 2,192
51 R.M. Davis $6.1B 43 5,812
52 Badgley Phelps Wealth Managers $4.3B 55 1,895 54 21
53 Pittenger & Anderson $2.4B+ 26 1,644 67 71
54 Schaper, Benz & Wise Investment Counsel $1.3B+ 30 772 49
55 Beese Fulmer Private Wealth Management $1.2B 41 965
56 BKD Wealth Advisors $4.9B+ 23 5,547 60
57 Farr, Miller & Washington $2.1B 25 1,307 64
58 Segall Bryant & Hamill $25B 26 4,812 68 70
59 Foster & Motley Wealth Management $1.9B+ 24 2,943 58 51
60 Meritage Portfolio Management $2.2B 30 560 59 49
61 Diversified Management $1.3B+ 28 1,516 11 19
62 C.W. Henderson & Associates $3.9B+ 31 1,431 73 85
63 Charles D. Hyman & Co. $1.9B 28 931 72 94
64 Henssler Financial $2.6B+ 34 4,372 80
65 Brown Capital Management $18.4B+ 30 126 74
66 Lee, Danner & Bass $1.4B 33 900 85 79
67 Steele Capital Management $2.7B+ 25 3,926 81 67
68 RTD Financial Advisors $1.8B+ 38 694 57 68
69 TFC Financial Management $1.3B 41 1,300
70 Beaird Harris $1.2B+ 25 2,499 66
71 Phillips Financial $1.2B+ 17 1,996
72 Index Fund Advisors $4.7B 21 2,348 93 76
73 HBKS Wealth Advisors $5.1B+ 20 5,705
74 E. S. Barr & Co. $1.7B 29 833 99 100
75 Sage Financial Group $2.7B+ 32 675 62 50
76 The Financial Advisory Group $1.1B 24 2,033
77 Willow Creek Wealth Management $1.6B 37 2,600
78 SJS Investment Services $2.5B+ 26 2,350
79 Jackson Thornton Asset Management $1.3B+ 22 915
80 Legacy Wealth Management $1.9B+ 39 3,370 94
81 Bedel Financial Consulting $1.8B+ 32 4,129 97
82 Sheaff Brock Investment Advisors $1.3B 20 2,064 95
83 Plancorp $5.6B+ 38 1,415
84 Prio Wealth Management $3.5B 33 1,500+
85 Meyer Capital Group $1.5B+ 58 2,157 71
86 Eagle Global Advisors $1.9B+ 25 400 84
87 Sadoff Investment Management $1.7B 43 1,222
88 Palisade Capital Management $5.3B 26 2,165 90
89 Chevy Chase Trust Company $37.3B+ 22 4,408
90 Cadinha & Co. $2.1B+ 42 1,357 50 56
91 Summit Financial Strategies $1.5B+ 26 850 89 75
92 StraightLine Group $1B+ 19 5,600
93 First Foundation Advisors $5.3B 31 3,600
94 Intersect Capital $1.6B 7 440
95 Southern Wealth Management $3.4B+ 16 232
96 Foster Group $2.6B 30 4,764
97 Bailard $5.2B 52 2,080 86 54
98 View Capital Advisors $1.3B+ 17 135
99 Shufro, Rose & Co. $2B 83 2,878
100 ML&R Wealth Management $1.7B+ 24 2,193

Sure raises $100M at a $550M valuation to help companies launch insurance products with its ‘flexible’ APIs

Confident, an insurance coverage infrastructure startup, declared right now that it has shut on $100 million in Sequence C funding at a $550 million valuation.

New York-primarily based Declaration Associates and European advancement investor Kinnevik co-led the funding, which also incorporated participation from WndrCo and existing backers W. R. Berkley and Menlo Ventures. The spherical provides the Santa Monica-based mostly startup’s full raised to $123.1 million since its 2015 inception.

Absolutely sure released its very first (organization SaaS) solution in early 2016, and these days counts classic economic expert services and fintech businesses alike among the its clients. Prospects include Farmers Insurance policies, Chubb, Intuit, Betterment, Revolut, Carvana, quite a few automotive manufacturers and a leading global credit score card network. All give insurance policy applications created on Sure’s infrastructure.

When Guaranteed would not disclose tricky revenue figures, it does assert to have been rewarding because 2019. Also, CEO and co-founder Wayne Slavin claims its annual recurring earnings (ARR) has grown “by more than 3X every single 12 months around the earlier quite a few years.”

In a nutshell, Absolutely sure states it has made know-how infrastructure that modernizes the overall insurance system and “allows it to be embedded into customer activities.” In other words, employing Sure’s infrastructure, companies can sell insurance specifically to customers “in a subject of milliseconds,” the enterprise promises, by an entirely electronic experience that does not involve paper or humans.

The enterprise is at the “forefront” of embedded insurance policies, according to Slavin.

That embedded insurance, he reported, is “insurance that is built-in into the brand’s present electronic solutions across all industries,” he said.

“This can array from car insurance involved in the on the internet obtain of a new electrical automobile or acquiring a employed vehicle on Carvana to purchasing enterprise coverage when you start your company’s new financial institution account,” Slavin added.

The benefits of applying its APIs allow corporations to go to current market with new insurance policies product or service offerings more quickly, simpler and more cost-effective as opposed to other methods, Slavin says.

“Sure differentiates in the a few pillars that subject to our prospects: experimented with and analyzed technological innovation infrastructure, swiftest velocity to marketplace and the capability to provide completely embedded customer activities,” Slavin told TechCrunch. “Like any legacy sector currently being disrupted there are quite a few gamers seeking to trip the wave of ‘embedded’ by rebranding their 1. experiences with a fancy new title. Real embedded insurance policies experiences are exceptional and pioneered by Positive for the reason that they are constructed from the ground up to fulfill an finish-to-stop transaction in the embedded channel.”

Sure

Guaranteed

Impression Credits: Absolutely sure / CEO and co-founder Wayne Slavin

The firm ideas to use its new capital from its expansion spherical to accelerate its world wide growth, pace up new product or service launches and keep on to “streamline embedded insurance policies purchaser activities.”

Worldwide expansion will occur in the sort of new customers — and places of work — in Europe, Latin America and Asia, as effectively as existing customers with productive domestic packages that program to expand their insurance policies solutions to international prospects, according to Slavin.

Sure also plans to carry on selecting. Sure’s recent staff rely is 80, which is up about 50{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} due to the fact final yr. The enterprise ideas to triple its engineering headcount in 2022.

Brian Stern, a companion at Declaration Associates, reported his organization was drawn to Positive since of its check out that Slavin is “a visionary leader” as perfectly as “the substantial international marketplace for this transformational technological know-how.”

“Sure is focused on the customer encounter, ease and the electric power of embedding this functionality into a consumer’s connection with a model,” he explained.

Kinnevik’s Ola Nordbye reported a pair of his firm’s portfolio businesses presently use Confident.

“We like how it permits better buyer encounters at the exact same time as it unlocks a large untapped profit pool for the brands that have currently acquired their shopper foundation,” he wrote through email. “One of the most complicated fintech areas to get right when it will come to this is inside of coverage. We were impressed by Sure’s condition-of-the-artwork tech platform, which is sophisticated far further than what you would count on from a organization at this phase, a founder with a crystal clear vision of what he wishes to develop blended with deep sector knowledge, and stellar money KPIs these kinds of as expansion and profitability.”

Nordbye included that Sure is exclusive in how it permits new profits streams on both equally finishes of the equation (insurance coverage corporations as nicely as brands), and that they do that as a software package perform and without having remaining a danger carrier.

“The simple fact that they can deliver holistic choices that can be sent at outstanding implementation pace is seriously exceptional as properly,” he added.