Berkshire Hathaway Finance Corporation — Moody’s affirms Berkshire Hathaway’s Aa2 senior debt rating, stable outlook

background image

background image

Rating Action:

Moody’s affirms Berkshire Hathaway’s Aa2 senior debt

rating, stable outlook

10 December 2021

New York, December 10, 2021 – Moody’s Investors Service has affirmed the Aa2 senior unsecured

debt rating and Prime-1 short-term issuer rating of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (Berkshire, NYSE: BRK)

as well as the ratings on subsidiary debts that are unconditionally and irrevocably guaranteed by

Berkshire (see list below). The rating outlook for Berkshire is stable.
RATINGS RATIONALE
According to Moody’s, the rating affirmation reflects Berkshire’s extraordinarily well capitalized

(re)insurance operations, its highly diversified earnings and cash flow from regulated and non-

regulated businesses, and its conservative financial policy, by which it maintains of a large liquidity

pool and moderate financial leverage. Partly offsetting these strengths are potential earnings

and capital volatility related to the company’s large, concentrated stock investments and its large

individual (re)insurance transactions. Other challenges include enterprise risk management given

the vast business portfolio, and leadership succession given the critical role CEO Warren Buffett has

played in developing Berkshire’s culture and financial performance.
Berkshire reported net operating earnings of $20.2 billion for the first nine months of 2021, up

19{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} versus the prior year period, reflecting strong double-digit increases in the railroad, utilities

and energy, and manufacturing, service and retailing segments, partly offset by a double-digit

decline in the (re)insurance segment. The year-to-date decline in (re)insurance results reflects

lower underwriting income, partly because of higher catastrophe losses, along with slightly lower

investment income. Moody’s expects that Berkshire will benefit from the recovering economy in 2022

and will continue to grow its operating earnings, cash flow and capital base over time.
As of September 30, 2021, Berkshire had consolidated cash and equivalents totaling $149 billion, a

majority held within the (re)insurance segment. The company had total borrowings of $115 billion, a

majority issued by the railroad and utilities and energy segments. Consolidated total leverage, which

incorporates all reported debt plus Moody’s adjustments for pensions and leases, was about 20{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} at

September 30, 2021, within Moody’s rating expectations. Berkshire generates healthy pretax interest

coverage, averaging more than 10 times over the past five years. The company holds at least $30

billion of cash and equivalents at or readily available to the parent to address potential needs or

opportunities.
FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS
Factors that could lead to an upgrade of Berkshire’s ratings include (i) meaningful improvement in

standalone credit profiles of major operating units, and (ii) continued holdings of substantial cash and

equivalents at or readily available to the parent company relative to outstanding indebtedness.
Factors that could lead to a rating downgrade include: (i) meaningful deterioration in standalone

credit profiles(s) of one or more major operating units, (ii) a shift towards a less conservative

financial profile (for example, total consolidated leverage exceeding 30{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}, or total leverage excluding

railroad, utilities and energy exceeding 15{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}), (iii) losses from (re)insurance underwriting and/or

investments causing a 15{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} decline in shareholders’ equity in a given year, or (iv) a significant

background image

background image

decline in cash and equivalents at or readily available to the parent (for example, declining toward

$30 billion, which management cites as a minimum balance).
Moody’s has affirmed the following ratings:
Berkshire Hathaway Inc. — long-term issuer rating and senior unsecured debt at Aa2, senior

unsecured shelf at (P)Aa2, short-term issuer rating at Prime-1;
Berkshire Hathaway Finance Corporation — backed senior unsecured debt at Aa2, backed senior

unsecured shelf at (P)Aa2;
The Lubrizol Corporation — backed senior unsecured debt at Aa2;
Precision Castparts Corp. — backed senior unsecured debt at Aa2.
The rating outlook for these companies is stable.
The methodologies used in these ratings were Property and Casualty Insurers

Methodology published in September 2021 and available at

https://www.moodys.com/

researchdocumentcontentpage.aspx?docid=PBC_1254163

, and Reinsurers Methodology published

in November 2019 and available at

https://www.moodys.com/researchdocumentcontentpage.aspx?

docid=PBC_1187551

. Alternatively, please see the Rating Methodologies page on www.moodys.com

for a copy of these methodologies.
Based in Omaha, Nebraska, Berkshire is a holding company engaged through subsidiaries in

diversified businesses that fall into four broad segments: (re)insurance; railroad; utilities and

energy; and manufacturing, service and retailing. Berkshire also holds sizable minority interests in

several publicly traded firms through its portfolio of common stocks, held mainly by its (re)insurance

subsidiaries. Berkshire generated total revenue of $204 billion, net operating earnings of $20.2

billion, and net income attributable to Berkshire of $50.1 billion for the first nine months of 2021.

The main differences between net income and operating earnings are that net income includes

unrealized gains on stock investments plus a smaller amount of realized investment gains. Berkshire

had total assets of $921 billion and Berkshire shareholders’ equity of $472 billion as of September

30, 2021.
REGULATORY DISCLOSURES
For further specification of Moody’s key rating assumptions and sensitivity analysis, see

the sections Methodology Assumptions and Sensitivity to Assumptions in the disclosure

form. Moody’s Rating Symbols and Definitions can be found at:

https://www.moodys.com/

researchdocumentcontentpage.aspx?docid=PBC_79004

.

For ratings issued on a program, series, category/class of debt or security this announcement

provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or

note of the same series, category/class of debt, security or pursuant to a program for which the

ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody’s rating practices.

For ratings issued on a support provider, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures

in relation to the credit rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular credit

rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider’s credit rating.

For provisional ratings, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the

provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent

to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not

changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would have affected the

background image

background image

rating. For further information please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective

issuer on www.moodys.com.
For any affected securities or rated entities receiving direct credit support from the primary entity(ies)

of this credit rating action, and whose ratings may change as a result of this credit rating action, the

associated regulatory disclosures will be those of the guarantor entity. Exceptions to this approach

exist for the following disclosures, if applicable to jurisdiction: Ancillary Services, Disclosure to rated

entity, Disclosure from rated entity.
The ratings have been disclosed to the rated entity or its designated agent(s) and issued with no

amendment resulting from that disclosure.
These ratings are solicited. Please refer to Moody’s Policy for Designating and Assigning Unsolicited

Credit Ratings available on its website www.moodys.com.
Regulatory disclosures contained in this press release apply to the credit rating and, if applicable, the

related rating outlook or rating review.
Moody’s general principles for assessing environmental, social and governance (ESG) risks in

our credit analysis can be found at

http://www.moodys.com/researchdocumentcontentpage.aspx?

docid=PBC_1288235

.

The Global Scale Credit Rating on this Credit Rating Announcement was issued by one of Moody’s

affiliates outside the EU and is endorsed by Moody’s Deutschland GmbH, An der Welle 5, Frankfurt

am Main 60322, Germany, in accordance with Art.4 paragraph 3 of the Regulation (EC) No

1060/2009 on Credit Rating Agencies. Further information on the EU endorsement status and on the

Moody’s office that issued the credit rating is available on www.moodys.com.
The Global Scale Credit Rating on this Credit Rating Announcement was issued by one of Moody’s

affiliates outside the UK and is endorsed by Moody’s Investors Service Limited, One Canada

Square, Canary Wharf, London E14 5FA under the law applicable to credit rating agencies in the UK.

Further information on the UK endorsement status and on the Moody’s office that issued the credit

rating is available on www.moodys.com.
Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to the lead rating analyst and to the

Moody’s legal entity that has issued the rating.
Please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for additional regulatory

disclosures for each credit rating.
Bruce Ballentine

VP-Sr Credit Officer

Financial Institutions Group

Moody’s Investors Service, Inc.

250 Greenwich Street

New York, NY 10007

U.S.A.

JOURNALISTS: 1 212 553 0376

Client Service: 1 212 553 1653
Sarah Hibler

Associate Managing Director

Financial Institutions Group

background image

background image

JOURNALISTS: 1 212 553 0376

Client Service: 1 212 553 1653
Releasing Office:

Moody’s Investors Service, Inc.

250 Greenwich Street

New York, NY 10007

U.S.A.

JOURNALISTS: 1 212 553 0376

Client Service: 1 212 553 1653

© 2021 Moody’s Corporation, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Moody’s Analytics, Inc. and/or their

licensors and affiliates (collectively, “MOODY’S”). All rights reserved.
CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS AFFILIATES ARE THEIR CURRENT

OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS,

OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MATERIALS, PRODUCTS, SERVICES AND

INFORMATION PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S (COLLECTIVELY, “PUBLICATIONS”) MAY INCLUDE

SUCH CURRENT OPINIONS. MOODY’S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN

ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME

DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT OR IMPAIRMENT.

SEE APPLICABLE MOODY’S RATING SYMBOLS AND DEFINITIONS PUBLICATION FOR

INFORMATION ON THE TYPES OF CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS ADDRESSED

BY MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK,

INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE

VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS, NON-CREDIT ASSESSMENTS (“ASSESSMENTS”), AND

OTHER OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS

OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE

QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS

OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S ANALYTICS, INC. AND/OR ITS AFFILIATES.

MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS DO

NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND MOODY’S

CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND

DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR

SECURITIES. MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND

PUBLICATIONS DO NOT COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY

PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY’S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS AND

OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLISHES ITS PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND

UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY

AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE,

HOLDING, OR SALE.
MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS, AND PUBLICATIONS

ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS

AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS,

ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS OR PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT

DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER

PROFESSIONAL ADVISER.

background image

background image

ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT

LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR

OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED,

DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR

ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY

MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY’S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS ARE

NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY ANY PERSON AS A BENCHMARK AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED

FOR REGULATORY PURPOSES AND MUST NOT BE USED IN ANY WAY THAT COULD RESULT

IN THEM BEING CONSIDERED A BENCHMARK.
All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY’S from sources believed by it to be

accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other

factors, however, all information contained herein is provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind.

MOODY’S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit

rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY’S considers to be reliable including, when

appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY’S is not an auditor and cannot

in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in

preparing its Publications.
To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents,

representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect,

special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection

with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if

MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers

is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to:

(a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant

financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY’S.
To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents,

representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses

or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but

excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt,

by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of,

MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers,

arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use

any such information.
NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS,

COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF

ANY CREDIT RATING, ASSESSMENT, OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE

BY MOODY’S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.
Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s

Corporation (“MCO”), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and

municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody’s

Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any credit rating, agreed to pay to Moody’s

Investors Service, Inc. for credit ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees ranging from

$1,000 to approximately $5,000,000. MCO and Moody’s Investors Service also maintain policies

and procedures to address the independence of Moody’s Investors Service credit ratings and credit

rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO

and rated entities, and between entities who hold credit ratings from Moody’s Investors Service and

background image

background image

have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}, is posted

annually at

www.moodys.com

under the heading “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance —

Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy.”
Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the

Australian Financial Services License of MOODY’S affiliate, Moody’s Investors Service Pty Limited

ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody’s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136

972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to “wholesale

clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access

this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY’S that you are, or are accessing

the document as a representative of, a “wholesale client” and that neither you nor the entity you

represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to “retail clients” within

the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY’S credit rating is an opinion as

to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or

any form of security that is available to retail investors.
Additional terms for Japan only: Moody’s Japan K.K. (“MJKK”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency

subsidiary of Moody’s Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody’s Overseas Holdings Inc.,

a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody’s SF Japan K.K. (“MSFJ”) is a wholly-owned credit rating

agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization

(“NRSRO”). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-

NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated

obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit

rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers

are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively.
MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including

corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated

by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any credit rating, agreed to pay to

MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for credit ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees ranging

from JPY125,000 to approximately JPY550,000,000.
MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory

requirements.

Hottest U.S. inflation rate in almost 40 years brings sigh of relief in some corners of financial markets

The hottest U.S. consumer inflation reading in almost 40 years is bringing a surprising sigh of relief in certain corners of the financial markets, where some were expecting a headline year-over-year number closer to 7{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}.

The relief was evident in investors’ appetite for U.S. Treasuries Friday morning after the government’s consumer price index report, which showed the headline year-on-year reading at 6.8{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} for November. While undoubtedly high, the reading dodged the 7{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} level that a few saw as a risk, raising hope that inflation may be in the process of topping out.

Read: Traders see next U.S. CPI reading close to 7{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} as volatile markets try to shake off omicron and Federal Reserve’s hawkish pivot

While the CPI print was high, “some folks on Wall Street were expecting an even higher number” and the core CPI number, which excludes volatile items, “was in line with expectations,” said Tim Holland, chief investment officer of Orion Advisor Solutions.

“The two points above have many thinking that we are close to, if not at, peak inflation,” Holland wrote in an e-mail to MarketWatch. “That strikes us as a reasonable view, which would point us towards lower inflation going forward, which would support / justify little to no movement in yields.”

Want intel on all the news moving markets? Sign up for our daily Need to Know newsletter. Use this link to subscribe.

Fixed income tends to be the asset class that gets hit hardest by rising inflation, which erodes the fixed value of bonds. Ordinarily, investors would be selling off Treasuries in response to a higher inflation print, which would lead to higher yields. Instead, ongoing demand for U.S. government debt, whether domestically or from abroad, pushed bond prices higher and yields lower Friday, as investors turn their attention to next Wednesday’s policy update from the Federal Reserve.

On Friday, yields fell across the curve, with the exception of 1-month and 2-month bill rates. The 10-year yield
TMUBMUSD10Y,
1.478{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}
slipped to around 1.45{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} and the 30-year
TMUBMUSD30Y,
1.872{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}
dropped to 1.84{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}, remaining near historically low levels.

Surprisingly, the 2-year yield, which reflects expectations for the near-term path of Fed policy, fell by the most, to around 0.64{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} which is still not far from the highest levels of the year. The move is counterintuitive because investors are expecting the Fed to proceed with a faster pace of tapering bond purchases, in order to have greater flexibility to hike interest rates sooner next year and combat inflation.

Meanwhile, equity investors brushed off the inflation print at first before all three U.S. stock benchmark indexes started giving up their earlier gains.

Gennadiy Goldberg, a senior US rates strategist for TD Securities, says the market pays less attention to the headline year-on-year figure than it does to the monthly numbers. “Yields are declining because month-over-month inflation didn’t come in as high as expected, and a lot of Fed tightening has already been priced in — with almost three rate hikes expected for 2022,” Goldberg said via phone.

“If you look at the long end and the pricing for rates in overnight-indexed swaps, the long-run terminal rate is just 1.5{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996},” below the 2.5{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} seen by Fed officials in September, he said. “That’s an indication that the market could be penciling in some policy error.”

Business News for Thursday, Dec. 9, 2021

Employees at a Buffalo-area Starbucks store have voted to form a union, making it the only one of the nearly 9,000 company-owned stores in the United States to be organized and notching an important symbolic victory for labor at a time when workers across the country are expressing frustration with wages and working conditions.

The result, announced on Thursday by the National Labor Relations Board, represents a major challenge to the labor model at the giant coffee retailer, which has argued that its workers enjoy some of the best wages and benefits in the retail and restaurant industry and don’t need a union.

The union was leading in an election at another store, but by a margin smaller than the number of ballots the union was seeking to disqualify through challenges. The challenges must be resolved by the labor agency’s regional director in the coming days or weeks before there is a result. Workers at a third store voted against unionizing, according to the board, though a union lawyer contended that some ballots had been delivered to the agency and not counted.

“Although it’s a small number of workers, the result has huge symbolic importance and symbols are important when it comes to union organizing,” John Logan, a labor studies professor at San Francisco State University, said in an email. “Workers who want to form a union in the United States are forced to take a considerable amount of risk, and it helps if they can see others who have taken that risk and it has paid off.”

The unionized employees, who are joining Workers United, an affiliate of the giant Service Employees International Union, received inquiries throughout the campaign from Starbucks workers across the country who said they were paying close attention and were interested in unionizing as well.

“I don’t think it will stop in Buffalo, whatsoever,” Alexis Rizzo, a worker at one of the stores and a leader in the organizing campaign, said at a news conference after the vote.

Workers cited frustration over understaffing and insufficient training when they filed for union elections at the stores in late August, problems that have dogged the company for years but which appeared to worsen during the pandemic. Such problems are not unique to Starbucks and have been problems for workers across the restaurant and retail industries for many years.

“We continue on as we did today, yesterday and the day before that,” Rossann Williams, Starbucks’s president of retail for North America, said in a letter to employees after the vote. “The vote outcomes will not change our shared purpose or how we will show up for each other.”

The election occurred through mail ballots that were due Wednesday. In November, workers at three more Buffalo-area stores filed the paperwork needed to hold union elections, but it was unclear when votes would take place for those outlets.

Starbucks responded to the union campaign with a sense of urgency. Throughout the fall, out-of-town managers and executives — even Ms. Williams — converged on stores in Buffalo, where they questioned employees about operational challenges and assisted in menial tasks like cleaning bathrooms.

In a video of a meeting in September viewed by The New York Times, a district manager from Arizona told co-workers that the company had asked her to go to Buffalo to help “save it” from unionization.

Several workers who support the union said they found the presence of these officials intimidating and, at times, surreal. They also complained that Starbucks had temporarily closed certain stores in the area, which they found disruptive, and said Starbucks had excessively added staff in at least one of the three stores that held elections. The workers said this had diluted support for unionization at the store.

“As of today we’ve done it in spite of everything that the company has thrown at us and we all know it has been an extensive anti-union campaign by Starbucks corporate,” Michelle Eisen, a barista at the Buffalo location that unionized who also helped lead the campaign, said at the news conference.

Former National Labor Relations Board officials have said that these actions by the company could be interpreted as undermining the “laboratory conditions” that are supposed to prevail during union elections and that they could serve as grounds for throwing out a result. Workers involved in the union campaign and a union lawyer indicated that they might challenge the result at the store where workers voted down the union.

A regional director of the labor board recently overturned a union election at an Amazon warehouse in Alabama on similar grounds.

Starbucks has said that it dispatched out-of-town officials and temporarily closed stores to help solve staffing and training problems and to remodel stores to make them more efficient. The company said that it added staff to deal with an increase in the number of workers calling in sick and that it had taken such steps across the country since the spring, when coronavirus infection rates dropped and stores became busier.

Ms. Williams, the North America president, said in an interview on Wednesday from Buffalo that she did not feel that the run-up to the vote had been especially contentious and that she had spent much of her time there this fall listening to employees (partners, in the company’s words) and addressing “the conditions that partners had pointed out.”

The key issue at the store whose vote was unresolved, near the Buffalo airport, was whether several workers who cast ballots were actually employed at the store. The union argues that they were employed at another store in the area and worked at the airport store for only a short period of time. The company said they were eligible to vote under the labor board’s rules.

The outcome could be important for determining the union’s leverage when it seeks to negotiate a contract. Under the law, an employer is obligated to bargain with a union in good faith, but there is no requirement that it actually agree to a contract, and the consequences of failing to bargain in good faith are limited.

“The incentives to resist bargaining are significant for the employer,” said Kate Andrias, a labor law expert at Columbia Law School. “If workers are able to win a good contract, it sets a precedent.”

Professor Andrias said that the ability to win a contract in such situations often hinged on the amount of economic pressure the union can exert, and that having a second unionized store could help in this regard.

Ms. Eisen, the worker at the store that unionized, said at the news conference that the workers would like to “offer the olive branch to the company and say, ‘Let’s put this behind us.’” She added: “Now is the time, let’s get to the bargaining table as quickly as possible.”

Starbucks has faced other union campaigns over the years, including one in New York City in the 2000s and one in 2019 in Philadelphia, where it fired two employees involved in organizing, a move that a labor board judge found unlawful. The company appealed the ruling and a decision is still pending.

Neither of those campaigns succeeded, but workers are unionized at Starbucks stores owned by other companies that operate them under licensing agreements. And workers at a company-owned store in Canada recently unionized.

A handful of the company’s early stores in Seattle had a union and were represented by the United Food and Commercial Workers in the 1980s. The union was decertified.

Wealth Enhancement Group Acquires Vivid Financial Management

Wealth Enhancement Group is acquiring Vivid Financial Management, a hybrid RIA based in central California with $674 million in client assets under management, the firm announced. The acquisition will push WEG’s AUM above $55 billion.

WEG CEO Jeff Dekko said the group was excited to work with the six-advisor practice “shoulder-to-shoulder” in the coming years, adding Vivid built a strong track record of planning-centered client service that brandished their reputation as a high-quality firm. In an interview with WealthManagement.com, Dekko also said the deal was indicative of WEG’s broader approach to acquisitions, and that the firm was not looking to buy firms everywhere solely for the sake of scale.

“National scale clearly matters, but we also believe local scale matters, because it creates a number of opportunities to create more team activity at a local level, and allows us to deliver business development and resources within that,” he said.

Vivid was founded in 2015, and includes three locations in Orcutt, Lompoc and Arroyo Grande, Calif. The firm was founded by Julie Darrah, Brad Boulton, Todd Woodland and Tim Miller, and its clientele includes executives, families and clients that range from physicians to dentists, educators and farmers. It offers an array of financial planning services, including tax, estate and insurance planning, as well as asset management services and retirement planning support.

With the addition of the three Vivid offices, the Minneapolis, Minn.-based WEG will now have seven outposts in California. According to Dekko, WEG began boosting its California presence in early June and July with acquisitions in the Los Angeles area (though the acquired firms had satellite offices in San Francisco). In considering how to broaden their Golden State reach, Dekko said they’d intended to mirror their approach in areas like the Northeast, where they set up shop in metro centers and branched out into the region like spokes on a wheel. Vivid became central to their California expansion, Dekko said.

“These folks came to us and they were just so good that we were ready to start that ‘spoke’ process,” he said.

WEG’s dealmaking has been prolific this year, with 16 in 2021 alone. In late September, the company announced its largest ever addition, acquiring QCI Asset Management, a 46-year-old independent RIA based in western New York, with $5.2 billion in total client assets (it was also WEG’s first acquisition in the region). The previous largest deal had been finalized earlier that same month, when WEG added the Charlotte, N.C.-based RIA Carroll Financial Associates, which had assets totaling about $4.7 billion. In August, the firm announced it was getting an investment from private equity firm Onex Corp., which became equal capital partners in WEG with TA Associates.

Dekko said WEG would likely announce more West Coast-based acquisitions soon, and also would continue its concentration on the Southeast. Helping direct the firm for the long-term was their belief that the number of transactions occurring among firms with an asset range of $500 million to $3 billion was likely to continue, but he expected at some point in the race for consolidation, aggregators would begin to consolidate themselves.

“I think that same thing is yet to come for us,” he said. “I think you’ll start to see it in 2022, and maybe 2023, you’ll start to see a little bit of that, maybe.”

Financial terms on the deal weren’t disclosed, but the deal will close on Dec. 31, with Darrah, Boulton and Miller all coming onboard as senior vice presidents and financial advisors at WEG.

ITC announces first-ever Institutional Investors and Financial Analysts Day on 14 December; analysts expect major announcements

ITC Limited stocks were in news on Thursday after the company informed the exchanges about an analyst and investor day, scheduled on 14 December. The news has already created a lot of buzz, analysts opined.   

The event ‘ITC Institutional Investors and Financial Analysts Day 2021’ is scheduled for 14th December. The six-hour event is also its first-ever and will be held between 10:30 am and 5 pm, the company said in its filing to exchanges. 

See Zee Business Live TV Streaming Below:

Technical Analyst Sacchitanand Uttekar said that the news was a positive trigger for the stock today and the company is expected to announce something major, calling this event “unprecedented” for the ITC.  

Uttekar, who is DVP-Head-Technicals & Derivatives at Tradebulls Securities said that he expected ITC to announce a demerger of its businesses. If this happens it will augur well for the company and its different businesses. This will not only help in the value unlocking of its businesses but also propel the stock prices, significantly, he added. 

The company has business interests in sectors including Fast Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG), IT, packaging, hotels and agri-business.  

ITC also remains a preferred by for this analyst and he recommended this stock for target of Rs 275. The stock today ended Rs 234.80, up by almost 4.4 per cent or over Rs 9 from the Wednesday closing price. He had recommended this stock at levels around Rs 229.  

Also Read: Stocks to Buy: With 20{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} upside, ITC is ‘preferred buy’ for this technical analyst; know why?

The views were also endorsed by another analyst, Sandeep Jain. The Tradeswift Director called this a positive development for the company and investors. 

He said that he expected some announcements around the demerger of ITC’s businesses. The demerger will trigger value unlocking of its various businesses, he opined. 

Even the top management has indicated its concerns around valuation, Jain said adding that some positive news was likely in the offing. 

See Tweet: 

It could be around bonus as well, he further said. Though the picture will get clear only after the analyst meet, he said.       

(Disclaimer: The views/suggestions/advises expressed here in this article is solely by investment experts. Zee Business suggests its readers to consult with their investment advisers before making any financial decision.)  

Stock futures edge up as investors await inflation data

Stock futures opened higher Thursday evening as investors awaited a key inflation report ahead of the Federal Reserve’s final policy-setting meeting of the year next week. 

Contracts on the S&P 500 gained. Earlier, the blue-chip index closed out the regular session in the red after three consecutive days of gains, with concerns over Omicron beginning to ease as new developments suggested the variant may not cause as severe of infections as previously feared. The Nasdaq dropped 1.7{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} during the regular trading day, but was still on track for a weekly return of nearly 2.9{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} after posting solid gains earlier this week. 

Investors on Friday are set to receive the Labor Department’s latest Consumer Price Index (CPI), which is expected to show another multi-decade high rate of inflation for November. Consensus economists are looking for the CPI to climb by 6.8{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} in November over last year, or the fastest annual rate since the 1980s. And even excluding more volatile food and energy prices, the core CPI likely rose by 4.9{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} over last year, or the fastest rate in about three decades.  

“We think that inflation is still going to be pretty broad when we see tomorrow’s report,” Luke Tilley, Wilmington Trust chief economist, told Yahoo Finance Live on Thursday. “But what we’re looking for is a deceleration as we go forward over the course of 2022.”

“That doesn’t mean prices are going to go down, it’s just a question of, are they going to go up as much in 2022 as in 2021 without the kind of fiscal stimulus we’ve had this year? And we don’t think that that’s going to happen, because it won’t be as much of a push on the demand side,” he added. “And then on the supply side, we’re looking for the labor market to improve, more people returning to work, and of course the delivery and the ports to improve.”  

Other recent data have further underscored the present tightness on the supply side of the economy. Weekly U.S. jobless claims plunged more than expected to reach the lowest level since 1969 last week, coming in even below pre-pandemic levels. And U.S. job openings came in at more than 11 million for only the second time on record in October.  

“Wage increases are probably on the agenda for next year. That’s part of the broadening of inflationary pressures that we’ve already started to see come through in some of that CPI data,” Seema Shah, Principal Global Investors chief strategist, told Yahoo Finance Live on Thursday. “But I have to say that we’re not so worried because we’re starting to see other parts of the inflation picture actually starting to fade. So at the end of next year, 12 months from now, we’re not expecting the kind of 6-7{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} CPI numbers that we may see tomorrow. We’re thinking more the 3{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} level for 12 months time.” 

Given the backdrop of elevated inflation, Federal Reserve officials have adopted more hawkish rhetoric about the monetary policy path forward. Some pundits suggested more rotation could occur in U.S. equity markets beneath the surface as investors price in expectations for tighter Fed policy to rein in inflation. The Federal Open Market Committee is slated to hold its final two-day monetary policy-setting meeting of the year next week. 

“If we go back to the bulk of the second half of 2020 and for much of this year, the pendulum of risk-on, risk-off in the market was really simply occurring just below the surface of the index, of the S&P 500 —meaning that when there was a risk-on rally, it was value and it was cyclicals,” Craig Fehr, principal and leader of investment strategy for Edward Jones, told Yahoo Finance Live on Thursday. “And when it was risk-off and the risk appetite was declining, it was tech that was the safe haven.”

“What we’re seeing is a transition now, particularly as the Fed is signaling a withdrawal of some of this excess liquidity and stimulus that’s been in place for quite some time,” he added. “The market isn’t going to run directly into high-valuation, perhaps tech names broadly like it has over the past year-and-a-half. I think we’re going to see more discernment.” 

—

6:25 p.m. ET Thursday: Stock futures open higher 

Here were the main moves in markets in late trading on Thursday:

  • S&P 500 futures (ES=F): +6.5 points (+0.14{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}), to 4,673.50

  • Dow futures (YM=F): +34 points (+0.1{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}), to 35,787.00

  • Nasdaq futures (NQ=F): +25.25 points (+0.16{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}) to 16,174.00

NEW YORK, NEW YORK - DECEMBER 08: Traders work on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) on December 08, 2021 in New York City. Following news from the pharmaceutical company Pfizer on the effectiveness of its vaccine against the Omicron COVID-19 variant, the Dow Jones Industrial Average rallied nearly 100 points in morning trading on Wednesday. (Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images)

NEW YORK, NEW YORK – DECEMBER 08: Traders work on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) on December 08, 2021 in New York City. Following news from the pharmaceutical company Pfizer on the effectiveness of its vaccine against the Omicron COVID-19 variant, the Dow Jones Industrial Average rallied nearly 100 points in morning trading on Wednesday. (Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images)

—

Emily McCormick is a reporter for Yahoo Finance. Follow her on Twitter