S&P pulls back from record, Nasdaq sheds 1.4{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}

Stocks traded lower on Monday, with the S&P 500 dipping below last week’s record level as traders awaited a Federal Reserve monetary policy decision later this week. 

The three major indexes declined. U.S. crude oil prices steadied trade near $71 per barrel. Treasury yields fell across the long end of the curve, and the benchmark 10-year yield held below 1.5{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}. Bitcoin prices declined to trade below $47,000. 

Investors’ focus this week will be on the Federal Reserve’s December policy-setting meeting, which will take place between Tuesday and Wednesday. A new monetary policy statement and press conference with Fed Chair Jerome Powell are due mid-week, alongside the Fed’s updated Summary of Economic Projections charting out individual members’ outlooks for economic conditions and interest rates. Policymakers for other central banks are also set to meet this week, including those from the Bank of England and European Central Bank. 

The Fed’s decision has taken on additional significance as the market attempts to predict how policymakers will weigh persistently elevated inflation against the specter of a fresh wave of the coronavirus with the newly discovered Omicron variant. U.S. inflation rose at its fastest pace since 1982 in November, last week’s Consumer Price Index (CPI) showed, pointing to the ongoing mismatch between supply and demand in the recovering economy. 

On the virus front, the Omicron variant has so far been detected in 30 states, according to data compiled by the New York Times. Early data so far have suggested the variant is more transmissible than the earlier Delta variant, but may cause less severe disease and be able to be neutralized by a booster dose of the COVID-19 vaccine, according to Pfizer. On Monday, the World Health Organization said the Omicron variant remains a “very high” global risk, while underscoring that data on the severity of the disease is still limited. 

But against the backdrop of inflation and a firming economic recovery, the Fed is expected to announce an acceleration of its asset purchase tapering process at the close of this week’s meeting, dialing back one of the central bank’s key tools that had helped support the economy during the pandemic. 

“Both equity and fixed-income markets appear to be pricing the coming Fed tightening,” David Kostin, Goldman Sachs chief U.S. equity strategist, wrote in a note. 

The firm expects the Fed to double the pace of tapering at this week’s meeting, bringing the Fed’s monthly drawdown of Treasuries and agency mortgage-backed securities purchases to $30 billion per month versus the current rate of $15 billion. 

“Historical experience suggest equity valuations are typically flat around the first Fed hike,” Kostin added. “Moreover, some of the longest duration and highest valuation stocks plunged during the past month, suggesting that equity market pricing of Fed tightening is also under way.” 

4:05 p.m. ET: Stocks end lower: S&P 500 drops 0.9{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} to pull back from record high, Nasdaq sheds 1.4{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}

Here were the main moves in markets as of 4:05 p.m. ET:

  • S&P 500 (^GSPC): -43.04 (-0.91{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}) to 4,668.98

  • Dow (^DJI): -320.04 (-0.89{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}) to 35,650.95

  • Nasdaq (^IXIC): -217.32 (-1.39{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}) to 15,413.28

  • Crude (CL=F): -$0.44 (-0.61{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}) to $71.23 a barrel

  • Gold (GC=F): +$2.70 (+0.15{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}) to $1,787.50 per ounce

  • 10-year Treasury (^TNX): -6.5 bps to yield 1.4240{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}

11:17 a.m. ET: USPS expects 2.3 billion pieces of mail to be delivered this week in busiest of the season

The U.S. Postal Service announced Monday that it expects 2.3 billion pieces of mail to be delivered during the week of Dec. 13, underscoring the heightened demand for shopping and shipping this holiday season. The USPS estimate includes both greeting cards and packages. 

“Since Dec. 6, customer traffic at all Post Office locations has been steadily increasing,” the USPS said in a press statement. “But this week is expected to be the busiest week of the holiday mailing and shipping season.”

Between Thanksgiving and New Year’s Day, an estimated 850 million to 950 million packages are expected to be delivered in total, USPS said. 

10:03 a.m. ET: Apple hits intraday record, closes in on $3 trillion market capitalization

Shares of Apple gained in intraday trading, bucking the downward trend of the broader market to come within striking distance of a $3 trillion market capitalization. At session highs, shares of Apple were trading at $181.80, or about 0.6{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} from the share price that would bring its market cap to the $3 trillion milestone. 

The iPhone-maker had become the first U.S. company ever to reach a $2 trillion market cap in August 2020. Peer technology giant Microsoft has also since rocketed to a more than $2 trillion valuation. 

Shares of Apple have gained more than 36{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} so far for the year-to-date, outperforming the S&P 500’s about 24.9{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} gain over that period. This comes on top of Apple’s 81{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} gain in 2020. 

9:33 a.m. ET: Stocks open slightly lower

Here’s where markets were trading just after the opening bell: 

  • S&P 500 (^GSPC): -5.26 (-0.11{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}) to 4,706.76

  • Dow (^DJI): -5.26 (-0.08{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}) to 35,943.90

  • Nasdaq (^IXIC): -35.94 (-0.23{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}) to 15,591.80

  • Crude (CL=F): -$0.44 (-0.61{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}) to $71.23 a barrel

  • Gold (GC=F): +$1.90 (+0.11{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}) to $1,786.70 per ounce

  • 10-year Treasury (^TNX): -4.1 bps to yield 1.448{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}

7:44 a.m. ET Monday: Stock futures head higher 

Here were the main moves in markets ahead of the opening bell on Monday: 

  • S&P 500 futures (ES=F): +10 points (+0.21{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}), to 4,721.00

  • Dow futures (YM=F): +18 points (+0.05{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}), to 35,985.00

  • Nasdaq futures (NQ=F): +64.5 points (+0.39{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}) to 16,394.25

  • Crude (CL=F): -$0.69 (-0.96{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}) to $70.98 a barrel

  • Gold (GC=F): +$5.60 (+0.31{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}) to $1,790.40 per ounce

  • 10-year Treasury (^TNX): -1.7 bps to yield 1.472{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}

NEW YORK, NEW YORK - DECEMBER 08: Traders work on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) on December 08, 2021 in New York City. Following news from the pharmaceutical company Pfizer on the effectiveness of its vaccine against the Omicron COVID-19 variant, the Dow Jones Industrial Average rallied nearly 100 points in morning trading on Wednesday. (Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images)

NEW YORK, NEW YORK – DECEMBER 08: Traders work on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) on December 08, 2021 in New York City. Following news from the pharmaceutical company Pfizer on the effectiveness of its vaccine against the Omicron COVID-19 variant, the Dow Jones Industrial Average rallied nearly 100 points in morning trading on Wednesday. (Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images)

Emily McCormick is a reporter for Yahoo Finance. Follow her on Twitter

Nissan Motor Acceptance Company LLC — Moody’s affirms at Baa3 Nissan Motor Acceptance’s long-term senior unsecured ratings; changes outlook to stable from negative

Rating Action: Moody’s affirms at Baa3 Nissan Motor Acceptance’s long-term senior unsecured ratings; changes outlook to stable from negativeGlobal Credit Research – 13 Dec 2021New York, December 13, 2021 — Moody’s Investors Service (“Moody’s”) has affirmed all the ratings for Nissan Motor Acceptance Company LLC (NMAC), including its Baa3 long-term senior unsecured ratings and its Prime-3 backed commercial paper rating. NMAC’s outlook was changed to stable from negative.The rating actions follow similar actions on the ratings for NMAC’s ultimate parent, Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. (Nissan, Baa3 stable), whose ratings were also affirmed with outlook changed to stable from negative.Affirmations:..Issuer: Nissan Motor Acceptance Company LLC….Backed Commercial Paper, Affirmed P-3….Backed Senior Unsecured Medium-Term Note Program, Affirmed (P)Baa3….Backed Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Affirmed Baa3….Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Affirmed Baa3Outlook Actions:..Issuer: Nissan Motor Acceptance Company LLC….Outlook, Changed To Stable From NegativeRATINGS RATIONALEThe ratings for NMAC reflect both its intrinsic credit quality (ba1 standalone assessment) and uplift derived from support from Nissan. NMAC’s Baa3 long-term ratings are aligned with Nissan’s Baa3 ratings, based on NMAC’s strategic significance to Nissan, Moody’s expectation that Nissan would support NMAC if required, as well as the explicit support agreement in place between the two companies.Moody’s said NMAC’s ba1 standalone assessment reflects its good capitalization that protects creditors against unexpected losses and strong liquidity. Similar to its peers, the company continues to be extremely profitable, and NMAC’s tangible equity to tangible assets remains strong (15.6{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} at 30 September 2021), despite it having made a sizeable $1.3 billion parental distribution in June 2021.Moody’s said that NMAC is the only firm among rated US auto captive companies that has an agreement with its parent wherein the parent provides an indemnification from losses associated with the lease portfolio (39{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} of managed assets at 30 September 2021), making NMAC comparatively less vulnerable to variations in used car prices. Moody’s expects the extraordinary used car price appreciation that has occurred during the coronavirus pandemic to moderate by the end of 2022. Through October 2021, used car prices increased 45{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} from 2020 levels.NMAC’s managed receivables ($38.2 billion at 30 September 2021) have declined by approximately 10{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} since last year. Moody’s expects, however, that the company’s receivables will be supported by better new vehicle sales at Nissan. Since the beginning of this year through 30 September 2021, Nissan saw an increase in sales in the US by approximately 19{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}. This compares to a decline of about 33{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} in 2020. The anticipated growth in retail portfolio may be slightly offset by declining dealer financings and uncertainty around consistency of new vehicle sales growth due to the semiconductor shortage and supply chain disruptions expected to continue partially through 2022. Other credit challenges for NMAC include its significant use of securitization that reduces the company’s ability to access alternative sources of liquidity, said Moody’s.FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGSNMAC’s ratings could be upgraded if the ratings for its parent Nissan are upgraded. An upward adjustment of NMAC’s standalone assessment is unlikely given its reliance on one car manufacturer for revenue and assets and its dependency on market funding.NMAC’s ratings could be downgraded following a downgrade of the ratings for its parent Nissan. A downward adjustment of NMAC’s standalone assessment could occur should there be a sustained material decline in asset quality and profitability, diminished liquidity, or leverage (TCE/TMA) reducing to less than 12{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}. However, a downward adjustment of NMAC’s standalone assessment without a change in Moody’s assessment of Nissan’s willingness and ability to support NMAC would likely not affect NMAC’s ratings.Headquartered in Franklin, Tennessee, Nissan Motor Acceptance Company LLC is a wholly owned subsidiary of Nissan North America, Inc., which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Nissan Motor Co., Ltd (Nissan). As of 30 September 2021, NMAC had approximately a $38 billion portfolio of finance receivables and operating leases.The methodologies used in these ratings were Finance Companies Methodology published in November 2019 and available at https://www.moodys.com/researchdocumentcontentpage.aspx?docid=PBC_1187099, and Captive Finance Subsidiaries of Nonfinancial Corporations published in August 2019 and available at https://www.moodys.com/researchdocumentcontentpage.aspx?docid=PBC_1183459. Alternatively, please see the Rating Methodologies page on www.moodys.com for a copy of these methodologies. REGULATORY DISCLOSURESFor further specification of Moody’s key rating assumptions and sensitivity analysis, see the sections Methodology Assumptions and Sensitivity to Assumptions in the disclosure form. Moody’s Rating Symbols and Definitions can be found at: https://www.moodys.com/researchdocumentcontentpage.aspx?docid=PBC_79004.For ratings issued on a program, series, category/class of debt or security this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series, category/class of debt, security or pursuant to a program for which the ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody’s rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the credit rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular credit rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider’s credit rating. For provisional ratings, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would have affected the rating. For further information please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com.For any affected securities or rated entities receiving direct credit support from the primary entity(ies) of this credit rating action, and whose ratings may change as a result of this credit rating action, the associated regulatory disclosures will be those of the guarantor entity. Exceptions to this approach exist for the following disclosures, if applicable to jurisdiction: Ancillary Services, Disclosure to rated entity, Disclosure from rated entity.The ratings have been disclosed to the rated entity or its designated agent(s) and issued with no amendment resulting from that disclosure.These ratings are solicited. Please refer to Moody’s Policy for Designating and Assigning Unsolicited Credit Ratings available on its website www.moodys.com.Regulatory disclosures contained in this press release apply to the credit rating and, if applicable, the related rating outlook or rating review.Moody’s general principles for assessing environmental, social and governance (ESG) risks in our credit analysis can be found at http://www.moodys.com/researchdocumentcontentpage.aspx?docid=PBC_1288235.The Global Scale Credit Rating on this Credit Rating Announcement was issued by one of Moody’s affiliates outside the EU and is endorsed by Moody’s Deutschland GmbH, An der Welle 5, Frankfurt am Main 60322, Germany, in accordance with Art.4 paragraph 3 of the Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 on Credit Rating Agencies. Further information on the EU endorsement status and on the Moody’s office that issued the credit rating is available on www.moodys.com.The Global Scale Credit Rating on this Credit Rating Announcement was issued by one of Moody’s affiliates outside the UK and is endorsed by Moody’s Investors Service Limited, One Canada Square, Canary Wharf, London E14 5FA under the law applicable to credit rating agencies in the UK. Further information on the UK endorsement status and on the Moody’s office that issued the credit rating is available on www.moodys.com.Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to the lead rating analyst and to the Moody’s legal entity that has issued the rating.Please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for additional regulatory disclosures for each credit rating. Inna Bodeck Vice President – Senior Analyst Financial Institutions Group Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. 250 Greenwich Street New York, NY 10007 U.S.A. JOURNALISTS: 1 212 553 0376 Client Service: 1 212 553 1653 Donald Robertson Associate Managing Director Financial Institutions Group JOURNALISTS: 1 212 553 0376 Client Service: 1 212 553 1653 Releasing Office: Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. 250 Greenwich Street New York, NY 10007 U.S.A. JOURNALISTS: 1 212 553 0376 Client Service: 1 212 553 1653 © 2021 Moody’s Corporation, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Moody’s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, “MOODY’S”). All rights reserved.CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS AFFILIATES ARE THEIR CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MATERIALS, PRODUCTS, SERVICES AND INFORMATION PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S (COLLECTIVELY, “PUBLICATIONS”) MAY INCLUDE SUCH CURRENT OPINIONS. MOODY’S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT OR IMPAIRMENT. SEE APPLICABLE MOODY’S RATING SYMBOLS AND DEFINITIONS PUBLICATION FOR INFORMATION ON THE TYPES OF CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS ADDRESSED BY MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS, NON-CREDIT ASSESSMENTS (“ASSESSMENTS”), AND OTHER OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S ANALYTICS, INC. AND/OR ITS AFFILIATES. MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS DO NOT COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY’S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS AND OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLISHES ITS PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS, AND PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS OR PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER.ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY’S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY ANY PERSON AS A BENCHMARK AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED FOR REGULATORY PURPOSES AND MUST NOT BE USED IN ANY WAY THAT COULD RESULT IN THEM BEING CONSIDERED A BENCHMARK.All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY’S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind. MOODY’S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY’S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY’S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing its Publications.To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY’S.To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information.NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY CREDIT RATING, ASSESSMENT, OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY’S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Corporation (“MCO”), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any credit rating, agreed to pay to Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. for credit ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,000 to approximately $5,000,000. MCO and Moody’s Investors Service also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of Moody’s Investors Service credit ratings and credit rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold credit ratings from Moody’s Investors Service and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance — Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy.”Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY’S affiliate, Moody’s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody’s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to “wholesale clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY’S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a “wholesale client” and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to “retail clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY’S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors.Additional terms for Japan only: Moody’s Japan K.K. (“MJKK”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody’s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody’s SF Japan K.K. (“MSFJ”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (“NRSRO”). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively.MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any credit rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for credit ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY125,000 to approximately JPY550,000,000.MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements. ​

Credit Suisse hires former AMP chief to lead wealth management

Credit Suisse has hired the former chief executive of Australian finance group AMP to run its revamped wealth management division, as the Swiss lender tries to win market share from its domestic rival UBS.

Francesco De Ferrari, who worked for Credit Suisse between 2002 and 2018, left AMP in June after a tough two years running the Australian wealth manager.

António Horta-Osório, chair of Credit Suisse, said De Ferrari’s experience of previously working at the Swiss bank’s wealth division in Asia and Europe would stand him in good stead.

“He will undoubtedly play a crucial role in delivering on the group’s new strategy towards a much stronger, more client-centric bank, with leading global businesses and regional franchises,” said Horta-Osório.

Expanding the wealth management is a top priority for the bank, and its ambitions were the main target of a strategy day to investors last month, as the investment bank is pared back.

In doing so, the lender intends to prove a tougher competitor to rival UBS, whose wealth business has left Credit Suisse trailing in the past couple of years.

Credit Suisse’s wealth business was at the centre of a corporate espionage scandal two years ago after its head, Iqbal Khan, defected to UBS and was trailed through the streets of Zurich by investigators hired by his former employer.

Philipp Wehle, who had been chief executive of Credit Suisse’s international wealth management business since 2019, will become chief finance officer of the wealth management business.

The appointments were finalised at a board meeting held in New York last week.

De Ferrari had a bruising stint at the top of AMP, which was criticised over its handling of a sexual harassment case, while shareholders were unhappy over the group’s dealmaking record.

The rehiring of De Ferrari came alongside the departure of one of the two women on Credit Suisse’s top executive team, Lydie Hudson, who oversaw sustainability, research and investment solutions, as well as being a champion of diversity at the lender.

The bank will bring in Joanne Hannaford from the start of next year as chief technology and operations officer. Hudson had previously been in charge of compliance, but was given a new role in an executive reshuffle last year.

Credit Suisse also confirmed the executive board for its new structure, which it announced last month.

In addition to wealth management, De Ferrari will lead the bank’s European, Middle East and African operations on an interim basis. Under the changes, investment bank chief Christian Meissner will have oversight for the Americas. Andre Helfenstein, who is head of the Swiss retail bank, will also oversee its overall Swiss operations.

Ulrich Körner will continue as head of asset management, while longtime Credit Suisse executive Helman Sitohang will be in charge of the Asia-Pacific region.

Thomas Gottstein, Credit Suisse chief executive, added: “With these appointments, as well as the appointment of Christian as CEO of the Americas region, the bank’s new divisional and regional structure is now complete and I am looking forward to working with all my executive board colleagues on executing our new strategy from January 1, 2022.”

Top Wall Street analysts say buy Rivian and Marvell

RJ Scaringe and team on opening day at Rivian’s manufacturing campus in Normal, IL.

Source: Rivian

The market volatility in recent weeks is enough to make even the most experienced investors worried, particularly as they contend with the omicron Covid variant and the prospect of tighter monetary policy from the Federal Reserve.

Wall Street’s top analysts are looking past the short-term tumult. These five stocks are potential long-term winners, according to TipRanks, which tracks the best-performing stock pickers.  

Marvell  

While the semiconductor sector has been benefitting greatly from the shift toward data centers and a digital economy, Marvell Technology (MRVL) is poised to capitalize. The semiconductor developer recently smashed its quarterly earnings, and analysts have taken a more bullish stance on its multi-year outlook. (See Marvell Risk Factors on TipRanks) 

Hans Mosesmann of Rosenblatt Securities published an upbeat report on the stock, noting that the firm saw sales growth over 30{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}, as well as a beat and raise on its guidance. Further, Marvell has mitigated supply chain impacts thus far.  

Mosesmann rated the stock a Buy, and raised his price target to $120 from $100.  

The analyst noted Marvell is experiencing robust demand in “all key infrastructure markets (DC, Carrier, Enterprise/Networking, and Auto/Industrial), with all of them inflecting on new transitions with 5nm-based application-specific integrated circuit/merchant silicon solutions in 2H22.” These chips are precisely what the company focuses on, and their applications are anticipated to “grow sequentially” moving forward, Mosesmann said.  

Calling the stock a “favorite secular idea,” the analyst stated that over the next few years “the company sees a step up and incremental revenue from cloud optimized silicon design wins, the ramp of 5G and increased dollar content, the increase in revenue of Automotive Ethernet conductivity, and the ramp of PAM4 [pulse amplitude modulation with four levels] and ZR products to support strong revenue growth.” 

Financial aggregator TipRanks currently places Mosesmann as No. 6 out of more than 7,000 professional analysts. He has been successful on his stock picks 81{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} of the time and has returned an average of 79{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} on each rating.  

Rivian   

The last few years have been revolutionary for the auto industry, as electric vehicle (EV) producers capture the attention of consumers and investors. After going public last month to much fanfare, Rivian Automotive’s stock (RIVN) appears to have calmed down in volatility, and analysts are largely bullish. (See Rivian Stock Analysis on TipRanks) 

Among those analysts is Daniel Ives of Wedbush Securities, who considers Rivian to be an “EV stalwart in the making,” due to its trajectory in capturing a largely unpenetrated market. While other EV makers have mainly focused on sportscars and sedans, Rivian is one of the first to offer luxury SUV and Pickup models.  

Ives rated the stock a Buy and initiated coverage with a price target of $130 per share.  

Relatively little competition stands in the way of RIVN, with only General Motors (GM), Ford (F), and Tesla (TSLA) having produced or announced plans for similar vehicles. When compared with smaller companies, Ives contends that Rivian is “leading the pack.”  

The analyst noted that RIVN is properly vertically integrated, and has tens of thousands of pre-orders ready to provide consistent demand moving forward. Additionally, the company is backed by Amazon and its 100,000-vehicle fleet order, which has given investors confidence.  

Ives believes that “Rivian is set to create a new category in the EV space with its game-changing debuts, a massive Normal, Illinois factory footprint, and create a major brand within the EV market over the next decade.” 

Out of over 7,000 financial analysts giving advice, Ives is considered by TipRanks to be No. 79. His stock ratings have returned correct 69{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} of the time and have resulted in an average return of 46.3{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} each.  

Alphabet  

Technology behemoth Alphabet (GOOGL) is one of the world’s most valuable companies, and it has been investing in AI across multiple sectors, ultimately boosting its third-quarter revenue. Further, the persisting macro societal at-home trends have played into the conglomerate’s hands, with little signs of slowing.  

Ivan Feinseth of Tigress Financial Partners said that the strong emphasis on artificial intelligence have benefited Alphabet’s new Pixel 6 smartphone and its general search engine features. He also noted that Apple’s (AAPL) iOS 14.5 privacy changes had minimal impacts on GOOGL’s advertising segment, due in part by the prevalence of the Android operating system. (See Alphabet Website Traffic on TipRanks) 

Feinseth rated the stock a Buy and raised his price target to $3,540 from $3,185.  

Regarding Alphabet’s exploratory innovations, the analyst added that the firm has invested in a “cutting-edge neural network-based natural language search process MUM (Multitask Unified Model), which is a thousand times more powerful than BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers).” 

Even with its heavy investments, GOOGL has maintained enough of a strong balance sheet to satisfy its shareholders in the near term. The company expanded its $50 billion share repurchasing program to include both classes of stock and has thus far executed on $36.8 billion this year.  

Feinseth is ranked at No. 55 out of more than 7,000 analysts on TipRanks, and has seen success 70{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} of the time. His ratings have averaged returns of 35.7{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}.  

SentinelOne  

With more digitization and cloud-based solutions for large enterprises and personal operations, the threat of cyberattacks has also risen. For investors seeking a way to play the cybersecurity space, Alex Henderson of Needham & Co. named SentinelOne (S) “the fastest growing company in our coverage list.”

The security technology firm recently posted impressive quarterly earnings, beating and raising guidance above Wall Street consensus estimates. SentinelOne has been expanding its distribution reach due in part to partnerships with managed security service providers. The company has also made further inroads into more substantial commercial firms. (See SentinelOne News Sentiment on TipRanks) 

Henderson rated the stock a Buy and declared a price target of $82.  

The analyst noted that “the multi-tenant, micro-services based, API-driven platform is particularly well suited to integrate into the operating environment of MSSPs, allowing SentinelOne to service this massive end-market opportunity in a cost-effective manner.” 

This past quarter saw new customers rapidly adopt SentinelOne’s complete product suite, as well as a higher rate of customers renewing their subscriptions.  

However, because the six-month lock-up period for its shares recently ended, the stock may still be affected by increased volatility in the near term. Despite this, Henderson anticipates SentinelOne will continue to benefit from the high popularity of its Cloud Workload service and other new product offerings, ultimately driving long-term upside.  

Out of over 7,000 financial analysts on TipRanks, Henderson is rated as No. 50. His success rate stands at 72{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}, and his stock ratings have returned him an average of 44.1{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}.  

Waste Connections  

When a pandemic hits, it affects just about every industry, even waste removal services. However, Waste Connections (WCN) has since pulled its business back to pre-pandemic levels, due in part by a wave of mergers and acquisitions aiding in inorganic growth, a loyal customer base, and strong wage incentives protecting it from an ongoing labor shortage. (See Waste Connections Insider Trading Activity on TipRanks) 

Hamzah Mazari of Jefferies Group elaborated on these positives in his recent report, stating that “WCN was stayed ahead of the curve when it comes to wages and continues to pay their drivers above market, which has helped with retention and employee quality.” Moreover, he does not foresee M&A “cooling off anytime soon.”  

Mazari rated the stock a Buy and decided on a bullish price target of $154 per share.  

The analyst noted that the waste removal firm has been mitigating inflation properly, after hiking its pricing up to 6{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}, a peak level beyond its previous high in 2008. WCN has a strong installed base in which it has cultivated trust through accountability. This allows the company more pricing-related leverage.  

As far as supply constraint concerns go, Waste Connections has been running a strategy in which it places orders for fleet and equipment far in advance, so as to put itself “at the front of the line.” In regard to the high wages its drivers and employees enjoy, these costs can be reduced in the second half of the next year if gross margins are too tight, thus relieving pressure.  

Financial aggregator TipRanks places Mazari at No. 443 out of over 7,000 analysts. His stock picks have been correct 62{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} of the time, and they have returned him an average of 39.6{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} each. 

FCA hires law firms and headhunters as staff vacancies mount

FCA hires law firms and headhunters as staff vacancies mount

The Financial Conduct Authority is recruiting private law firms to help process applications and has spent almost £1m on headhunters this year as it battles to deal with almost twice its typical number of vacancies after a wave of departures, Travel & Tips.

The news comes after Nikhil Rathi, the head of the UK’s financial services watchdog, defended his transformation project to the Treasury select committee last Wednesday, telling them that while there would be “noise” about the changes for some time to come, the FCA was headed in the right direction.

Rathi’s team has provoked a fierce backlash from staff over attempts to change the FCA’s work practices and pay structures, efforts that management say will deliver a more efficient regulator better placed to prevent future scandals like the 2019 implosion of London Capital & Finance, which cost 12,000 savers £236m.

The grievances of FCA staffers have been publicly aired by trade union Unite, which is pushing to represent them. A person familiar with the FCA’s operations said vacancy levels were now running at about 500, versus typical levels of 300. The FCA’s staff is about 4,000.

Against that backdrop, the financial watchdog has been advertising contracts for consultants to pick up the slack, including a recent tender for lawyers to help with the “change of control” applications that financial services groups file when their ownership changes.

The FCA stressed that the “final decision on an application will be taken by an FCA staff member”. The regulator attributed the need for external resources to an “increase in the number of change in control applications”.

“In order to ensure that we can process these as quickly as possible, while maintaining our high standards, we have employed some short-term resources to support us,” the FCA added. Change of control applications are deemed approved if they are not processed within 60 days, so the regulator cannot afford a pile-up.

Regulated firms and their lawyers have been complaining of delays in other areas of the FCA’s work. A lawyer who spoke to the Financial Times said the time taken for some applications was the longest he could remember in a decade.

“There is a very real sense that the FCA is dangerously understaffed in certain key areas, mainly areas that actually provide a service to authorised persons [regulated firms],” the lawyer said.

Last July, Rathi said he was adding 100 staff to its authorisations division. On Wednesday, he told the Treasury select committee that the FCA was deliberately giving companies a more vigorous assessment.

The third-party law firm for change of control applications, which has not yet been appointed, will be used for a maximum of six months and will involve a maximum of 17 people.

The government tendering website also details almost £1m of spending on headhunters to bolster the FCA’s ranks after a string of resignations. The FCA said last week that Megan Butler, head of the transformation project, was leaving.

The £1m was spread across 12 different tenders for executive searches to fill roles including directors, heads of departments, general counsel and the chair of the FCA’s consumer panel. The largest was a £155,000 contract to find a new finance director and finance head of division.

In 2020, the FCA advertised for headhunters just three times, with a total bill of almost £400,000, according to notices posted on the government’s procurement website.

At the Treasury select committee hearing, Rathi said the FCA’s attrition levels for 2021 were not unusually high and that it was facing the same pressures as commercial companies in an intense jobs market. Several FCA insiders and those who recently left the regulator told the FT that staff had been leaving because of the fallout from the transformation plan.

Business Tips
Health News
Future Technology

Saudi Real Estate Refinance Company (SRC) issues SAR 2 billion Sukuk, under its existing Sukuk Programme, to increase its support for home ownership in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

New funding raised will enable mortgage originators to provide lower mortgage rates and support the housing market, making borrowing more accessible to buyers

Issuance helps to deepen Saudi capital markets under Financial Sector Development Program

RIYADH, Saudi Arabia, Dec. 12, 2021 /PRNewswire/ — Saudi Real Estate Refinance Company (SRC) successfully completed issuing a SAR 2 billion Sukuk to support lenders in the housing market, with the aim to further expand home ownership by making it more affordable. The Sukuk was guaranteed by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia through the Ministry of Finance.

Saudi Real Estate Refinance Company Logo (PRNewsfoto/Saudi Real Estate Refinance Company)

Saudi Real Estate Refinance Company Logo (PRNewsfoto/Saudi Real Estate Refinance Company)

The 10-year Sukuk was issued at a competitive fixed profit rate of 3.04{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} marketed to Saudi institutional investors, the deal was oversubscribed 2.5 times

Fabrice Susini, CEO of SRC, which is wholly owned by the Public Investment Fund (PIF), said: “The very positive reception in the market for our Sukuk demonstrates strong confidence in the Saudi housing market and economy, and robust investor support for our business model as home ownership continues to increase. The funding raised will enable us to expand our relationships with home finance lenders, as Saudi Arabia moves closer to its target of achieving 70{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} home ownership among Saudi nationals by 2030.”

“Our latest Sukuk issuance also adds further depth to the Saudi fixed income market in line with the goals of the Financial Sector Development Program (FSDP) as part of Vision 2030.”

SRC’s new series of Sukuk was issued under its SAR 10 billion Sukuk Programme established earlier this year, under which SRC has the ability to issue sovereign-guaranteed instruments targeting local investors. Its first Sukuk offerings under the programme were issued in March 2021 in two tranches of 7 and 10-years totaling SAR 4 billion.

SRC’s refinancing activities for lenders helps develop an active secondary home financing market in the Kingdom which supports the efficiency and stability of the primary housing market.

The lead coordinator for the transaction was HSBC Saudi Arabia and the joint lead managers were AlJazira Capital, Al Rajhi Capital, HSBC Saudi Arabia, Riyad Capital, Saudi Fransi Capital, and SNB Capital.

About Saudi Real Estate Refinance Company (SRC):

Fully owned by the Public Investment fund (PIF), the Saudi Real Estate Refinance Company (SRC) was established in 2017, after obtaining a license to operate in the secondary real estate market by the Saudi Central Bank, with the goal of transforming the local housing market.

SRC enables individuals and entities interested in direct or indirect real estate financing to increase and diversify origination of long-term fixed-rate (LTFR) products.

As one of its primary roles, SRC provides banks and real estate finance companies with liquidity or capital relief, enabling growth in the home financing sector to increase home ownership rates among Saudi citizens. SRC will subsequently aggregate and packages home financing portfolios into mortgage-backed securities to be sold to domestic and international investors.

With a world class management team drawing from international best practice, SRC is uniquely positioned to become the partner of choice for banks and non-bank lenders in the Kingdom.

SRC is rated ‘A’ (stable) by Fitch Ratings and ‘A2’ (stable) by Moody’s Investors Service.

For more information please visit: http://srco.com.sa/

Logo – https://mma.prnewswire.com/media/1707793/Saudi_Real_Estate_Refinance_Company_Logo.jpg

Cision

Cision

View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/saudi-real-estate-refinance-company-src-issues-sar-2-billion-sukuk-under-its-existing-sukuk-programme-to-increase-its-support-for-home-ownership-in-the-kingdom-of-saudi-arabia-301442704.html

SOURCE Saudi Real Estate Refinance Company