Texas comptroller threatens to boycott 19 investment companies unless they promise to support oil and gas

Texas comptroller threatens to boycott 19 investment companies unless they promise to support oil and gas

Texas Comptroller Glenn Hegar advised 19 investment decision corporations to reveal their stance on fossil fuels or deal with divestment.

AUSTIN, Texas — The Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts, Glenn Hegar, despatched a letter to 19 investment corporations inquiring about their loyalty to fossil fuels.

Three firms are based mostly in the U.S.: BlackRock Inc., Invesco Ltd., and JPMorgan Chase & Co. The relaxation span the globe.

Read the letter to the 19 organizations right here.

Senate Monthly bill 13 demands all Texas retirement courses to move funds absent from organizations that boycott oil and gasoline. The bill was signed into legislation previous 12 months.

The investments affect Teachers Retirement Technique of Texas (TRS) and the Worker Retirement Technique of Texas (ERS).

Hegar questioned the 19 businesses to explain their policies and treatments.

“We know some of these corporations keep investments in oil and gas right now, but what about the foreseeable future? Are they providing the hope of a ‘green’ tomorrow with promises to divest or reduce their fossil gas publicity? A handful of organizations are echoing claims by the Biden administration about a ‘transition’ to eco-friendly electrical power. They’ve managed to influence folks that electrical cars and wind and photo voltaic power generation can meet our energy requirements, and if we just quit investing in oil and fuel, the changeover will be swift and painless. Any one who has compensated any focus to the latest situations appreciates that just isn’t correct,” Hegar explained in a press release to KVUE Information.

Read through the full launch from Hegar right here.

Hegar requested the providers to also list any mutual cash and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) which boycott or limit financial investment in fossil fuels.

“Our exploration therefore significantly displays that some companies are telling us and other energy-generating states 1 factor, and then turning all over and telling their liberal consumers in other states another point,” Hegar reported in the launch.

Previous January, the KVUE Defenders reported on how strengthening the State’s electric powered grid could impression retirement bucks.

Texas law demands the electrical power grid supervisor to use pure gasoline for extra than half of its energy era.

Dollars invested to boycott fossil fuel investments would threaten the grid’s most significant power useful resource except the Point out transformed its strength combine.

Related: How the Texas energy grid could be impacting your retirement system

The corporations have 60 times to reply.

Hegar expects to ship yet another round of letters, making contact with 100 extra publicly traded financial commitment businesses.

Hegar will afterwards publish the listing of corporations on the comptroller’s web page.

The comptroller’s site exhibits the State’s current divestment checklist consists of:

KVUE on social media: Fb | Twitter | Instagram | YouTube

Men and women ARE ALSO Examining: 

Elon Musk’s renowned ex Grimes reportedly living in Austin with notorious whistleblower

The College of the Southwest confirms fatal accident involving van carrying golf groups

Austin company invites SXSW-goers to expertise earth-well-known road artist Banksy

LPL Attracts Texas Advisory Team From Wells Fargo

LPL Attracts Texas Advisory Team From Wells Fargo

An advisory duo centered in The Woodlands, Texas, is becoming a member of LPL Strategic Wealth Products and services (SWS) and forming a new independent observe, the independent broker/vendor declared Monday. 

Richard DeYoung and Jessica Boehm are becoming a member of LPL from Wells Fargo Advisors, the place they managed about $280 million in advisory, brokerage and retirement plan property, and the new observe will be called Highland Prosperity Partners.

DeYoung and Boehm satisfied four a long time ago, and operate with individuals and people, trusts, small business and nonprofits. They’ll be joined in the new agency by guidance workers Debbie Gregori and Cindy Binn, and will enable the staff to remove expense minimum amount requirements for clientele. In accordance to Boehm, the LPL partnership offered the duo the ideal blend of autonomy with customers and back again-business office guidance.

“With Strategic Wealth Companies, almost everything is already designed in and we’re not on our very own,” she stated. “This way, we can aim on what we do ideal and take pleasure in being advisors.”

The partnership with Highland Prosperity Companions is the 22nd observe to sign up for LPL’s Strategic Prosperity Services since its start in April 2020 the design is built to focus on wirehouse and regional advisors wanting to produce an impartial business even though nevertheless getting the again-office aid standard in the personnel design. Earlier this yr, SWS attracted a Lincoln, Neb.–based financial advisor with about $750 million in managed property to go away D.A. Davidson the partnership became SWS’ first in the Midwest since its inception.

LPL’s also captivated a selection of advisors from Wells Fargo in latest months, together with a $1 billion AUM trio based mostly out of Salt Lake City who joined LPL’s Stratos Prosperity Partners from Wells Fargo in late February. Previously this 12 months, a different Texas-primarily based duo with about $275 million in managed property joined SWS from Wells Fargo, even though last September a team with $305 million out of New Jersey also joined SWS following leaving Wells Fargo (Larry Boggs, a Maryland-primarily based advisor with $1.3 billion AUM, was SWS’ largest addition and joined from Wells Fargo last 12 months). 

Additionally, LPL declared final month that Bozeman, Mont.–based fiscal advisor John “Mark” Ross, who managed about $100 million in property, experienced affiliated with Linsco by LPL, the firm’s personnel advisor design, also signing up for from Wells Fargo Advisors. Very last 7 days, To start with Hope Prosperity Administration, an Andover, N.J.based mostly crew with about $195 million in managed assets from the financial investment plan at Very first Hope Lender, joined LPL’s Institution Services system. The team experienced formerly been affiliated with Raymond James.

LPL also lately declared the benefits of its fourth quarter, acquiring recruited $17 billion in assets in Q4 2021 and $89 billion for the 12 months, which was double its 2020 whole. Wealthy Steinmeier, a taking care of director and divisional president for LPL, speculated that advisor head rely would grow above 20,000 by the conclude of this year’s initial quarter.

Mississippi Business Finance Corporation — Moody’s upgrades Entergy Texas to Baa2 and changes the outlooks for Entergy Arkansas and Entergy Mississippi to positive.

Rating Action: Moody’s upgrades Entergy Texas to Baa2 and changes the outlooks for Entergy Arkansas and Entergy Mississippi to positive.Global Credit Research – 28 Jan 2022New York, January 28, 2022 — Moody’s Investors Service (“Moody’s”) today upgraded the long-term ratings of Entergy Texas, Inc. (ETI), including its issuer rating to Baa2, from Baa3, and first mortgage bond rating to A3, from Baa1, due to improved legislative and regulatory support for the company. The outlook for ETI is stable.Simultaneously, Moody’s affirmed the long-term ratings of Entergy Arkansas, LLC (EAL), including its Baa1 issuer rating and A2 first mortgage bond rating, and Entergy Mississippi, LLC (EML), including its Baa1 issuer rating and A2 first mortgage bond rating. Moody’s also changed the outlooks for EAL and EML to positive, from stable, reflecting our expectation that both utilities will generate and maintain stronger financial metrics, including ratios of cash flow from operations before the changes in working capital (CFO pre-WC) to debt around 20{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}.A complete list of rating actions can be found below.Upgrades:..Issuer: Entergy Texas, Inc….. Issuer Rating, Upgraded to Baa2 from Baa3….Pref. Stock Preferred Stock, Upgraded to Ba1 from Ba2….Senior Secured First Mortgage Bonds, Upgraded to A3 from Baa1….Senior Secured Shelf, Upgraded to (P)A3 from (P)Baa1Affirmations:..Issuer: Entergy Arkansas, LLC…. Issuer Rating, Affirmed Baa1….Senior Secured First Mortgage Bonds, Affirmed A2….Senior Secured Shelf, Affirmed (P)A2..Issuer: Entergy Mississippi, LLC…. Issuer Rating, Affirmed Baa1….Pref. Stock Preferred Stock, Affirmed Baa3….Senior Secured First Mortgage Bonds, Affirmed A2….Senior Secured Shelf, Affirmed (P)A2..Issuer: Independence (County of) AR….Senior Secured Revenue Bonds, Affirmed A2….Underlying Senior Secured Revenue Bonds, Affirmed A2..Issuer: Mississippi Business Finance Corporation….Senior Secured Revenue Bonds, Affirmed A2….Underlying Senior Secured Revenue Bonds, Affirmed A2..Issuer: Pope (County of) AR….Senior Unsecured Revenue Bonds, Affirmed Baa1Outlook Actions:..Issuer: Entergy Arkansas, LLC….Outlook, Changed To Positive From Stable..Issuer: Entergy Mississippi, LLC….Outlook, Changed To Positive From Stable..Issuer: Entergy Texas, Inc…..Outlook, Changed To Stable From PositiveRATINGS RATIONALEETI’s upgrade reflects an improved legislative and regulatory environment, following the recent authorization to securitize over $250 million of storm costs[1] and expedited cost recovery of the Montgomery County Power Station (MCPS)[2], a gas-fired combined-cycle plant which commenced operations and was reflected in rates in January 2021. These cost recovery provisions should help the company to generate CFO pre-WC to debt above 15{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} over the next several years, commensurate with Baa2 integrated peers.EAL’s positive outlook considers Arkansas’ supportive legislative action that was enacted in March 2021, which clarified and extended the utility’s formula rate plan (FRP) provisions, along with our expectation that the company will generate stronger financial metrics, including a ratio of CFO pre-WC to debt around 20{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} over the next 2-3 years.Similarly, EML’s positive outlook reflects our expectation that the company’s ratio of CFO pre-WC to debt will be sustained around 20{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}, while operating within a FRP framework that provides timely, predictable and consistent recovery of costs and investments.All three companies benefit from strong legislative and regulatory support and improving financial metrics. Financial metrics are increasing, organically, following material cash outflow during 2018-2020, which included over $800 million in aggregate customer rebates due to the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. These refunds have largely been completed, which allows for a natural uplift in cash flow generation. We expect financial metrics to improve further, due to ongoing rate increases that reflect each utility’s growing rate base as well as timely recovery of operating costs.For ETI, annual capital cost recovery occurs through distribution and transmission cost riders, and more recently through a generation cost recovery rider (GCRR), which reflects a higher revenue requirement when a discrete asset is placed into service. Furthermore, ETI is expected to file a general rate case in Q2 2022 to update its operating cost recovery and begin to recoup non-rider investment.For EAL and EMI, capital and operating cost recovery occurs annually through their respective FRP filings. These regulatory proceedings are particularly credit supportive since they include forward-looking provisions that enhance the predictability and stability of cash flow, especially when compared to peer utilities operating under more traditional, or less comprehensive, cost recovery frameworks.OutlooksETI’s stable outlook incorporates our expectation that the company will generate cash flow to debt ratios above 15{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} and that supportive regulatory outcomes will continue, including the company’s upcoming general rate case proceeding.EAL’s positive outlook reflects the strong legislative support for utility cost recovery and the transparent, and now more predictable, formula rate construct in Arkansas. The newly clarified FRP should allow the company to maintain a ratio of CFO pre-WC to debt consistently around 20{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}.EML’s positive outlook is based on the timely cost recovery and transparent rate making offered by its FRP, which should translate into the company maintaining a ratio of CFO pre-WC to debt of 20{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} going forward.FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGSFactors That Could Lead to an UpgradeETI could be upgraded with ongoing supportive regulatory and legislative treatment, along with a ratio of CFO pre-WC to debt consistently above 18{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}. The incorporation of more forward-looking cost recovery mechanisms could also put upward pressure on ETI’s rating.EAL could be upgraded if financial metrics improved to a level where the company’s ratio of CFO pre-WC to debt is consistently at 20{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}, while maintaining its current level of cost recovery support from the FRP.EML’s rating could be upgraded if its CFO pre-WC to debt metric is sustainable at 20{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}, along with maintaining timely cost recovery through the FRP.Factors That Could Lead to a DowngradeETI could be downgraded if regulatory support for cost recovery wanes, if significant weather events continue to cause material physical damage to its assets and timely cost recovery is not certain or if the company’s ratio of CFO pre-WC to debt drops below 15{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} for a sustained period of time.For EAL, a ratio of CFO pre-WC to debt declining below 16{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} on a sustained basis could cause downwards rating pressure. Also, a deterioration in regulatory support, unforeseen complications with the FRP process (especially after recent legislative actions), or other added regulatory uncertainties could cause a downgrade of EAL’s ratings.EML’s rating could be downgraded in the event of an adverse regulatory decision, weakening ability to recover costs or decreasing predictability of cash flows. A downgrade could also be considered if significant storm costs were not recovered in a timely basis, or if the company’s ratio of CFO pre-WC to debt declined below 16{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} for an extended period of time.The principal methodology used in these ratings was Regulated Electric and Gas Utilities published in June 2017 and available at https://www.moodys.com/researchdocumentcontentpage.aspx?docid=PBC_1072530. Alternatively, please see the Rating Methodologies page on www.moodys.com for a copy of this methodology.REGULATORY DISCLOSURESFor further specification of Moody’s key rating assumptions and sensitivity analysis, see the sections Methodology Assumptions and Sensitivity to Assumptions in the disclosure form. Moody’s Rating Symbols and Definitions can be found at: https://www.moodys.com/researchdocumentcontentpage.aspx?docid=PBC_79004.For ratings issued on a program, series, category/class of debt or security this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series, category/class of debt, security or pursuant to a program for which the ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody’s rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the credit rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular credit rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider’s credit rating. For provisional ratings, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would have affected the rating. For further information please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com.For any affected securities or rated entities receiving direct credit support from the primary entity(ies) of this credit rating action, and whose ratings may change as a result of this credit rating action, the associated regulatory disclosures will be those of the guarantor entity. Exceptions to this approach exist for the following disclosures, if applicable to jurisdiction: Ancillary Services, Disclosure to rated entity, Disclosure from rated entity.The ratings have been disclosed to the rated entity or its designated agent(s) and issued with no amendment resulting from that disclosure.These ratings are solicited. Please refer to Moody’s Policy for Designating and Assigning Unsolicited Credit Ratings available on its website www.moodys.com.Regulatory disclosures contained in this press release apply to the credit rating and, if applicable, the related rating outlook or rating review.Moody’s general principles for assessing environmental, social and governance (ESG) risks in our credit analysis can be found at http://www.moodys.com/researchdocumentcontentpage.aspx?docid=PBC_1288235.The Global Scale Credit Rating on this Credit Rating Announcement was issued by one of Moody’s affiliates outside the EU and is endorsed by Moody’s Deutschland GmbH, An der Welle 5, Frankfurt am Main 60322, Germany, in accordance with Art.4 paragraph 3 of the Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 on Credit Rating Agencies. Further information on the EU endorsement status and on the Moody’s office that issued the credit rating is available on www.moodys.com.The Global Scale Credit Rating on this Credit Rating Announcement was issued by one of Moody’s affiliates outside the UK and is endorsed by Moody’s Investors Service Limited, One Canada Square, Canary Wharf, London E14 5FA under the law applicable to credit rating agencies in the UK. Further information on the UK endorsement status and on the Moody’s office that issued the credit rating is available on www.moodys.com.REFERENCES/CITATIONS[1] https://interchange.puc.texas.gov/Documents/51997_77_1171649.PDF 02-Dec-2021[2] https://interchange.puc.texas.gov/Documents/50031_41_1074248.PDF 08-Jul-2020Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to the lead rating analyst and to the Moody’s legal entity that has issued the rating.Please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for additional regulatory disclosures for each credit rating. Ryan Wobbrock VP – Senior Credit Officer Infrastructure Finance Group Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. 250 Greenwich Street New York, NY 10007 U.S.A. JOURNALISTS: 1 212 553 0376 Client Service: 1 212 553 1653 Michael G. Haggarty Associate Managing Director Infrastructure Finance Group JOURNALISTS: 1 212 553 0376 Client Service: 1 212 553 1653 Releasing Office: Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. 250 Greenwich Street New York, NY 10007 U.S.A. JOURNALISTS: 1 212 553 0376 Client Service: 1 212 553 1653 © 2022 Moody’s Corporation, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Moody’s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, “MOODY’S”). All rights reserved.CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS AFFILIATES ARE THEIR CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MATERIALS, PRODUCTS, SERVICES AND INFORMATION PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S (COLLECTIVELY, “PUBLICATIONS”) MAY INCLUDE SUCH CURRENT OPINIONS. MOODY’S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT OR IMPAIRMENT. SEE APPLICABLE MOODY’S RATING SYMBOLS AND DEFINITIONS PUBLICATION FOR INFORMATION ON THE TYPES OF CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS ADDRESSED BY MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS, NON-CREDIT ASSESSMENTS (“ASSESSMENTS”), AND OTHER OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S ANALYTICS, INC. AND/OR ITS AFFILIATES. MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS DO NOT COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY’S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS AND OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLISHES ITS PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS, AND PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS OR PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER.ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY’S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY ANY PERSON AS A BENCHMARK AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED FOR REGULATORY PURPOSES AND MUST NOT BE USED IN ANY WAY THAT COULD RESULT IN THEM BEING CONSIDERED A BENCHMARK.All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY’S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind. MOODY’S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY’S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY’S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing its Publications.To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY’S.To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information.NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY CREDIT RATING, ASSESSMENT, OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY’S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Corporation (“MCO”), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any credit rating, agreed to pay to Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. for credit ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,000 to approximately $5,000,000. MCO and Moody’s Investors Service also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of Moody’s Investors Service credit ratings and credit rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold credit ratings from Moody’s Investors Service and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance — Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy.”Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY’S affiliate, Moody’s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody’s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to “wholesale clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY’S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a “wholesale client” and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to “retail clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY’S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors.Additional terms for Japan only: Moody’s Japan K.K. (“MJKK”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody’s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody’s SF Japan K.K. (“MSFJ”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (“NRSRO”). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively.MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any credit rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for credit ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY100,000 to approximately JPY550,000,000.MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements. ​

Texas pipeline company threatens to cut off fuel to major power generator

Jefferies Emerges as Winner as Texas Gun Law Rattles the Muni Market

(Bloomberg) — Jefferies Economic Team is emerging as a clear winner of a faltering effort by Texas Republicans to punish Wall Road banks for their restrictive gun procedures.

Most Read through from Bloomberg

The beneficial Texas municipal-bond industry, 2nd only to California in conditions of issuance, has been turned on its head considering that a law took influence Sept. 1 that bars state entities and area governments from working with corporations if they “discriminate” from firearms providers.

With some of Wall Street’s most significant banking institutions acquiring halted public-finance transactions in Texas due to the fact of the legislation, Jefferies is main companies that have viewed their business enterprise surge. It was the best municipal underwriter in the quickly-developing state for the previous four months, while in the same time period final year it was 12th, facts compiled by Bloomberg demonstrate.

“This is the greatest-escalating spot in the muni marketplace — other corporations that are snug with the compliance will most likely make a even bigger enjoy for Texas,” stated Martin Luby, a professor who researches public finance at the Lyndon B. Johnson University of Public Affairs at the University of Texas at Austin. With the law making an chance for smaller companies, “they should really get a very little a lot more intense and will most likely ramp up selecting.”

As 2021 winds down, the Texas muni marketplace and the bankers who perform organization with its myriad issuers, from the point out to neighborhood businesses and school districts, are at a crossroads. There are signs that the turf struggle is much from in excess of, with key sums at stake for the winners — hundreds of millions of dollars in underwriting service fees just for the college personal debt authorised in Texas in the very last five several years.

Very last month, Citigroup Inc. underwrote its 1st transaction because August. The deal closed on Dec. 14 following obtaining the approval of the state’s Republican lawyer standard. The bank, especially focused by the gun law’s sponsor, prohibits its retailer buyers from featuring bump stocks or marketing guns to people who haven’t passed a qualifications check out or are youthful than 21.

Restart Signal

Citigroup, the best muni underwriter in the state the earlier a few many years and even now the next-largest nationwide, has slumped to ninth in Texas in 2021. Its restart there is an indication that other big Wall Street banking companies whose Texas muni organization is however on pause — JPMorgan Chase & Co., Financial institution of The united states Corp. and Goldman Sachs Group Inc. — might have an option to recommence underwriting there as effectively.

But it might not be straightforward to convince issuers to hire them on deals once again in the put of rivals that have been generating inroads in the state.

Jefferies receives credit score for underwriting all over $1.9 billion of extended-phrase Texas municipal-bond promotions from Sept. 1 via Dec. 21, up from about $555 million in the exact time period of 2020, details compiled by Bloomberg present. Additional than two-thirds of its 2021 quantity came after the law went into influence, highlighted by a $615 million supplying in Oct by the Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority.

The financial institution is sending a robust sign that it options to keep on to its gains, and that it’s a destination for bankers at corporations that have been shut out in new months.

Jefferies this tumble employed Citigroup’s Mark Tarpley, a Dallas-centered banker who concentrated on K-12 university districts, a sector of the Texas current market that Jefferies historically didn’t have a massive presence in. It also brought on Pedro Ramos, a Denver-centered banker who labored on Texas muni deals at JPMorgan Chase.

A spokesperson for Jefferies, which is rated 9th this year for nationwide muni underwriting, declined to remark.

Jefferies Poaches Two Bankers From Rivals Ousted in Texas

Other corporations have climbed the ranks as very well. Dallas-based Hilltop Holdings Inc. will get credit for about $1.3 billion of Texas offers because the regulation went into impact, as opposed with $341 million in the very same period of time past 12 months. That made it the fifth-greatest underwriter in that period of time, up from 18th in the calendar year-before span.

And Barclays Plc is credited with managing $972 million of Texas muni discounts since Sept. 1, in comparison with $208 million in the exact same time period final year. That would make it the sixth-major underwriter there due to the fact Sept. 1, up from 21st a 12 months previously.

Representatives for Barclays declined to comment. Hilltop spokesperson Jacy Hirschfeld mentioned by means of electronic mail that the legislation has had minimal impact on the financial institution, and rather attributed the underwriting growth to selecting more bankers, traders and revenue individuals about the previous 12 months.

Compliance Query

Raymond James, the 2nd-largest underwriter in Texas in 2021, confirmed the more assurances bankers want to make to issuers against the backdrop of the new legislation.

When Goldman Sachs dropped out as senior manager of an problem by the Texas Community Finance Authority, which sells debt for condition entities, the authority evaluated the other banks in its underwriting syndicate to see who could replace Goldman, Lee Deviney, the agency’s govt director, reported via electronic mail. He said he contacted Raymond James to see if the bank could comply with the gun legislation.

In September and Oct, Raymond James banker Debi Jones emailed Deviney about the legislation, declaring in 1 concept that her organization did not have an situation complying with it, according to e-mails received through a community information request.

“I briefed them on your situation and John Carson, President of Raymond James Economical, provided to arrive at out to you to categorical the firm’s motivation to Texas and our ability” to serve “a more substantial part,” Jones wrote to Deviney on Oct. 1. A spokesperson for the bank declined to comment additional.

Raymond James went on to underwrite the agency’s $832 million bond sale in November, the bank’s largest transaction in Texas all yr.

Most Study from Bloomberg Businessweek

©2021 Bloomberg L.P.

Prominent Financial Advisor Henry Bragg Celebrates Launch Of Independent Wealth Management Firm In Houston, Tx | Texas News

HOUSTON, Nov. 29, 2021 /PRNewswire/ — Experienced wealth advisor Henry Bragg, CPA, CFP®, is pleased to announce the first anniversary of Henry Bragg & Co., an independent Registered Investment Advisor (RIA). Serving as the Principal, Bragg celebrates the successful launch of his firm, which offers a full complement of comprehensive portfolio and wealth management services. Foremost among the firm’s responsibilities as an investment advisor is the obligation to act in the best interests of its clients. 

Building on more than 20 years of experience, including five years at professional services firm Ernst & Young, and as partner with two different investment management firms, Bragg leverages his broad experience in investments, tax, and estate planning. Henry Bragg & Co. is centered around personalized services with a hands-on, individual approach for clients. Bragg understands and communicates the “big picture” while relating it to the client’s personal needs, goals, and family values. Bragg utilizes specialized wealth mapping techniques to visually illustrate a client’s overall financial picture. Bragg believes finding perspective in the complexities of each client’s individual circumstances is key.

“While I established my career at larger firms,” Bragg said, “I saw the opportunity for a more individualized approach. The ability to serve our clients based on their specific needs and financial subtleties makes all the difference in their overall success. As a result, tailored plans are core to our work.”

In keeping with the firm’s vision and to serve clients’ needs, Henry Bragg & Co. offers a variety of services including portfolio management, retirement planning, managing trusts and estates, tax and insurance planning, charitable giving, next-generation investment education, wealth transfer design, and succession planning.

“A good wealth advisor can help clients see the forest, the trees, and where the roads need to be built.” said Bragg. “People may not think of engaging a wealth advisor until something new or significant is happening in their lives. However, having an advisor help you plan for the future is important no matter what stage of life you’re in. We all need help at some point. Life doesn’t slow down; it only moves on. Not being prepared can lead to unexpected challenges and missed opportunities.”

With a passion for helping people and building relationships, Bragg strives to be more than a financial advisor. Clients see him as a trusted partner dedicated to helping them bring their finances in good order.

Henry Bragg & Co. is a member of the Wealth Advisor Alliance and is closely supported by Forum Financial Management, recently named a Top 300 financial advisor by the Financial Times. For more information on Henry Bragg & Co. and its wealth management services, please visit www.henrybraggco.com

About Henry Bragg & Co.

Headquartered in Houston, TX, Henry Bragg & Co. is a wealth management firm that specializes in designing tailored investment and planning strategies for its clients. Led by Principal Henry Bragg, CPA, CFP®, the firm prides itself on its detail-oriented approach to the “big picture,” believing perspective is found in the complexities of each client’s unique circumstances. The firm follows an integrated method to portfolio management, financial planning, and risk management, working closely with clients to help them streamline their situation and capitalize on the opportunities of substantial wealth. Passionate about helping people, Henry Bragg strives to be more than a financial advisor. Clients see him as a trusted partner dedicated to helping them bring their finances in good order.

Cision View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/prominent-financial-advisor-henry-bragg-celebrates-launch-of-independent-wealth-management-firm-in-houston-tx-301433429.html

SOURCE Henry Bragg & Co.