Business Line Reporting Revamp Leaves Investors Wanting More

Business Line Reporting Revamp Leaves Investors Wanting More

It’s billed as the most important transform to section reporting in fiscal statements due to the fact 1997, but to the investors and analysts ready years for advancements to the way businesses report their significant enterprise strains, it falls much quick.

The Fiscal Accounting Benchmarks Board’s proposal phone calls on businesses to crack out new information about sizeable charges in their running segments—but it tinkers with current regulations instead than overhauling them. It also injects further versatility into an already judgment-laden set of guidelines, analysts and traders are telling the US accounting rulemaker.

“It’s not some thing that I imagine is a match changer or one thing investors are likely to be enthusiastic about in its recent construction,” said David Gonzales, senior accounting analyst at Moody’s Buyers Company. “We just can’t say it will provide greater data to buyers.”

The Oct proposal phone calls on general public companies to split out the important bills in their operating segments—units inside of a business that earn funds and incur bills. The proposal does not define what “significant” means, a different space of heartburn for analysts, as properly as auditors who have to vet organization numbers.

Some massive organizations, these as Nike Inc., split out their working segments by wherever in the earth they market their merchandise, though many others, like Gap Inc. determinethem by personal models, these types of as Previous Navy and Banana Republic. The division of segments is based mostly on irrespective of whether a company’s management consistently assessments the final results of the individual models.

Corporations have wide discretion to determine out how to divide their segments—or whether they need to have to divide them at all. 1 3rd of all community companies, such as Netflix Inc., report only 1 running segment. Organizations will have to separately report the financial gain or loss in just these business models, but they’re not required to crack down fees like payroll or expenditures of merchandise offered.

That’s wherever FASB’s proposal comes in. Organizations would have to report major cost specifics each and every reporting period—not just annually—and even enterprises that report a one section would have to comply. New expense information will assist economical assertion viewers glean critical insight into the charges that generate financial general performance and assistance traders make better forecasts, proponents say.

“I just cannot see any eyesight in which traders will not close up with far more info under this challenge,” FASB Vice Chair James Kroeker claimed in July, when FASB was crafting the approach.

But traders never just want additional details they want information that’s as constant as feasible from organization to enterprise. The adaptability baked into the proposal—relying on administration to self-determine “significant” expenses—is a issue, claimed Todd Castagno, head of worldwide valuation at Morgan Stanley’s study division.

“It’s the selection of results we’re likely to get. It’s extremely uncertain,” Castagno said.

U-Haul Holding Co. built a very similar stage. For the reason that just about every corporation breaks down its segments in a distinctive way, cost disclosure will not be constant amongst companies, likely even in the same industries, the business told FASB in a new comment letter. U-Haul’s premier reportable phase is transferring and storage, for example, but that phase could be the smallest for its rivals.

Rooted in Judgment

The section accounting normal, ASC 280, is rooted in judgment a company’s administration has broad berth to determine out how to break out its segments. The Securities and Trade Commission regularly presses businesses to reveal additional when the regulator reviews company economical statements, whilst firms are often leery of delivering sensitive data to competitors.

“Almost from the commencing, the money analysts said, ‘Thank you extremely significantly, but this is not really adequate,’” said Dennis Beresford, accounting professor at the College of Georgia, and chair of FASB from 1987 to 1997, when the initial section procedures have been issued. “Over time, each time the diverse surveys were being created of the investment neighborhood, that is been No. 1 on their desire list—to boost the segment disclosures.”

FASB in 2017 started out looking at strategies to enhance phase reporting by forcing a lot more segment breakdowns. By 2020, it experienced narrowed its concentrate to make on what is now necessary.

The California Community Workforce Retirement Technique, the biggest public pension fund in the US, expressed disappointment about where FASB ended up.

“Put basically, we would have most well-liked the FASB acquire a more substantial action in line with its mission and induced organizations to deliver significantly extra data,” the fund wrote in a comment letter to FASB. The fund explained it would “reluctantly” aid the proposal only for the reason that inquiring FASB to consider a new method would suggest “another various years” of ready.

Further Insight

Providers at the moment are necessary to disclose the earnings or loss in their working segments. The measure firms report doesn’t have to align with U.S. normally acknowledged accounting concepts, or GAAP, if which is how management assesses the device.

But the evaluate also has to be one that is intently aligned to US accounting rules. So, if Hole Inc.’s CEO actions Outdated Navy’s functionality utilizing EBITDA—earnings ahead of desire, tax, depreciation and amortization, and a person of the most frequent non-GAAP measures—then that number can be claimed in the segment disclosure as lengthy as the enterprise reconciles it, or maps it back, to the official, consolidated economical final results.

Under FASB’s plan, corporations that use many strategies to evaluate segment overall performance would be permitted to report these additional measures, like more non-GAAP steps. Two FASB members—Christine Botosan and Gary Buesser—dissented in component since of considerations about explicitly permitting extra choice actions in the economical statement footnotes.

This caught the interest of a panel at the American Institute of CPAs, which also elevated fears about extra non-GAAP actions. The proposal doesn’t expressly prohibit a company from making use of a extra unusual, or customized selection, these types of as the kind that the SEC frowns upon in earnings releases that undo official accounting, reported Angela Newell, deputy handling husband or wife at BDO United states LLP and chair of the AICPA panel.

“It’s one particular issue to add or subtract points that are accounted for in accordance with GAAP, it is a different factor to modify GAAP, so to converse,” Newell explained. “Right now, this proposal doesn’t contain individuals guardrails or prohibitions.”

Polestar stock surges after reporting first-ever profit as a public company

Polestar stock surges after reporting first-ever profit as a public company

In anything of a modify this earnings time, an electric carmaker (other than Tesla) truly described a revenue for the quarter.

Polestar (PSNY), the Swedish-based mostly firm backed by Volvo and China’s Geely, claimed its initial gross income as a community corporation since completing its SPAC merger before this year.

For the quarter, Polestar noted:

Though Polestar did miss on the best line, revenue ended up up 105{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} for the quarter as opposed to very last 12 months, and it was more than enough to eke out a $4 million gross earnings for the quarter. The firm was able to trim its functioning loss for Q3 by one-third as opposed to last 12 months as properly.

By means of the first 9 months of the calendar year, Polestar documented $54 million in gross revenue on $1.48 billion in profits. Throughout that time Polestar sent 30,424 cars globally, and the company mentioned it was on monitor to strike its shipping target of 50,000 vehicles for the 12 months. The corporation expects $2.4 billion in product sales for the year, predicting that general performance will be “driven by solid Q4 2022 profits.”

Polestar also stated it was adequately funded by means of 2023, citing its previously funding offer well worth $1.6 billion, delivered by its company dad and mom Volvo and Geely.

CHICHESTER, UNITED KINDOM - JUNE 24: The Polestar O2 seen at Goodwood Festival of Speed 2022 on June 24th in Chichester, England. The annual automotive event is hosted by Lord March at his Goodwood Estate. (Photo by Martyn Lucy/Getty Images)

CHICHESTER, UNITED KINDOM – JUNE 24: The Polestar O2 noticed at Goodwood Festival of Pace 2022 on June 24th in Chichester, England. The annual automotive function is hosted by Lord March at his Goodwood Estate. (Picture by Martyn Lucy/Getty Photos)

Polestar suggests its products pipeline is slated to expose new item launches like the Polestar 4 SUV in 2023, the Polestar 5 grand touring sedan in 2024, and the Polestar 6 roadster in 2026. Polestar previously declared its Polestar 3 SUV would be coming in the fourth quarter future yr, and will inevitably be developed at Volvo’s plant in South Carolina in mid-2024.

All was not good information however, as Polestar CEO Thomas Ingenlath reported offer chain issues and components shortages would hamper production.

“Will the scenario enhance upcoming year? No, we be expecting this once more to be one thing that keeps us hectic,” Ingenlath said in a media briefing. Earlier this 12 months Polestar trimmed its creation forecast to 50,000 from 65,000 thanks to COVID-related shutdowns in China. Polestar builds its automobiles at plant in Chengdu, China.

Nevertheless, Polestar shares are surging these days on the back of today’s outcomes. With the backing of its company moms and dads, Polestar has been ready to leverage the manufacturing and engineering capabilities of Volvo and Geely to see its “asset-light” enterprise product be successful when other pure-enjoy EV rivals like Rivian (RIVN), Lucid (LCID), and even Nio (NIO) battle for profitability.

Pras Subramanian is a reporter for Yahoo Finance. You can stick to him on Twitter and on Instagram.

Examine the most current monetary and business information from Yahoo Finance

Down load the Yahoo Finance application for Apple or Android

Comply with Yahoo Finance on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, Flipboard, LinkedIn, and YouTube

TD ESTABLISHES A WEALTH MANAGEMENT AND INSURANCE REPORTING SEGMENT

TD ESTABLISHES A WEALTH MANAGEMENT AND INSURANCE REPORTING SEGMENT

New alignment of segments reflects the growth and scale of businesses

TORONTO, Oct. 28, 2022 /CNW/ – TD Bank Group (“TD” or the “bank”) announced today a new alignment of its reportable business segments to establish a Wealth Management and Insurance segment. This change is effective the beginning of the fourth quarter of 2022 and reflects how the Bank will now view its businesses for management reporting purposes. Previously, Wealth Management and Insurance was reported along with Canadian Personal and Commercial Banking in the Canadian Retail segment.

“The Wealth Management and Insurance businesses provide a significant and growing contribution to TD’s success. They have an increasingly high profile in senior management analysis and strategic planning and this new reporting alignment provides TD shareholders with additional information on their performance,” said Kelvin Tran, Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, TD Bank Group.

An abridged version of the supplemental financial information package reflecting the new alignment of the Bank’s reportable segments on a retrospective basis is now available on td.com/investor.

TD Wealth Management includes the #1 online brokerage, the #1 institutional money manager and a rapidly growing Wealth Management advice provider in Canada. TD Insurance includes the #1 Direct-to-Consumer Insurer for Home and Auto, and the #1 Affinity provider in Canada. With combined compound annual growth of 12{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} net income after tax (NIAT) in Wealth Management and Insurance over the past five years, the businesses are well-positioned to continue to deliver exceptional experiences for customers and clients and achieve their strategic ambitions.

SEGMENT ALIGNMENT

The Bank will report its results under the following segments, with comparative periods showing the new aligned segments:

  • Canadian Personal and Commercial Banking, comprised of the Canadian personal and commercial banking businesses which provides financial products and services to personal, small business and commercial customers, and TD Auto Finance Canada.
  • U.S. Retail, comprised of the personal and business banking businesses in the U.S. operating under the brand TD Bank, America’s Most Convenient Bank®, primarily in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic regions and Florida, TD Auto Finance U.S., and the U.S. wealth business, including Epoch and the Bank’s equity investment in Schwab.
  • Wealth Management and Insurance, includes the Canadian wealth business which provides investment products and services to institutional and retail investors, and the insurance business which provides property and casualty insurance, as well as life and health insurance products to customers across Canada.
  • Wholesale Banking, provides a wide range of capital markets, investment banking, and corporate banking products and services, including underwriting and distribution of new debt and equity issues, providing advice on strategic acquisitions and divestitures, and meeting the daily trading, funding, and investment needs of the Bank’s clients.
  • Corporate, includes the Bank’s other activities.

An abridged version of the supplemental financial information package reflecting the newly aligned reportable segments is being provided to help readers of the Bank’s financial statements better understand the impact on the Bank’s consolidated financial results. The comparative period results reflecting the new segment alignment presented below and in the accompanying supplemental financial information package are unaudited. Certain information has been adjusted as defined under the heading ‘Non-GAAP Financial Measures’ below.

Presented below are reported and adjusted Net income (loss) by business segment reflecting the Bank’s newly aligned reportable segments.

Net Income (loss) by Business Segment1

(millions of Canadian dollars)

For the three months ended

For the nine months ended

July 31, 2022

April 30, 2022

January 31, 2022

July 31, 2022

Reported

Adjusted

Reported

Adjusted

Reported

Adjusted

Reported

Adjusted

Canadian Personal and Commercial Banking

$

1,678

1,678

$

1,568

$

1,568

$

1,618

$

1,618

$

4,864

$

4,864

U.S. Retail2

1,442

1,464

1,367

1,198

1,272

1,272

4,081

3,934

Wealth Management and Insurance

575

575

668

668

636

636

1,879

1,879

Wholesale Banking

271

271

359

359

434

434

1,064

1,064

Corporate2

(752)

(175)

(151)

(79)

(227)

(127)

(1,130)

(381)

Net income (loss)

$

3,214

3,813

$

3,811

$

3,714

$

3,733

$

3,833

$

10,758

$

11,360

For the years ended October 31

2021

2020

Reported

Adjusted

Reported

Adjusted

Canadian Personal and Commercial Banking

$

5,885

$

5,885

$

3,996

$

3,996

U.S. Retail

4,985

4,985

3,026

3,026

Wealth Management and Insurance3

2,596

2,596

2,030

2,128

Wholesale Banking

1,570

1,570

1,418

1,418

Corporate4

(738)

(387)

1,425

(600)

Net income (loss)

$

14,298

$

14,649

$

11,895

$

9,968

1  For more detailed information on a reported basis refer to the Segmented Information disclosure included with this press release.

2  Refer to the “How We Performed” section of the Bank’s second quarter 2022 Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) and third quarter 2022 MD&A which are available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com, and are incorporated by reference, for a list of the items of note, and a reconciliation of adjusted to reported results. Non-GAAP financial measures and ratios used in this document are not defined terms under IFRS and, therefore, may not be comparable to similar terms used by other issuers.

3  Adjusted Net income (loss) excludes charges associated with the acquisition of Greystone – 2020: $100 million ($98 million after tax).

4  Adjusted Net income (loss) excludes the following items of note:

i.

 Amortization of acquired intangibles – 2021: $285 million ($253 million after tax); 2020: $262 million ($225 million after tax).  

ii.

Acquisition and integration charges related to the Schwab transaction – 2021: $103 million ($98 million after tax).

iii.

Net gain on sale of investment in TD Ameritrade – 2020: $1,421 million ($2,250 million after tax).

Caution Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

From time to time, the Bank (as defined in this document) makes written and/or oral forward-looking statements, including in this document, in other filings with Canadian regulators or the United States (U.S.) Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and in other communications. In addition, representatives of the Bank may make forward-looking statements orally to analysts, investors, the media and others. All such statements are made pursuant to the “safe harbour” provisions of, and are intended to be forward-looking statements under, applicable Canadian and U.S. securities legislation, including the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements made in this document, the Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“2021 MD&A”) in the Bank’s 2021 Annual Report under the headings “Economic Summary and Outlook” and “The Bank’s Response to COVID-19”, under the headings “Key Priorities for 2022” and “Operating Environment and Outlook” for the Canadian Retail, U.S. Retail, and Wholesale Banking segments, and under the heading “Focus for 2022” for the Corporate segment, and in other statements regarding the Bank’s objectives and priorities for 2022 and beyond and strategies to achieve them, the regulatory environment in which the Bank operates, the Bank’s anticipated financial performance, and the potential economic, financial and other impacts of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Forward-looking statements are typically identified by words such as “will”, “would”, “should”, “believe”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “intend”, “estimate”, “plan”, “goal”, “target”, “may”, and “could”.

By their very nature, these forward-looking statements require the Bank to make assumptions and are subject to inherent risks and uncertainties, general and specific. Especially in light of the uncertainty related to the physical, financial, economic, political, and regulatory environments, such risks and uncertainties – many of which are beyond the Bank’s control and the effects of which can be difficult to predict – may cause actual results to differ materially from the expectations expressed in the forward-looking statements. Risk factors that could cause, individually or in the aggregate, such differences include: strategic, credit, market (including equity, commodity, foreign exchange, interest rate, and credit spreads), operational (including technology, cyber security, and infrastructure), model, insurance, liquidity, capital adequacy, legal, regulatory compliance and conduct, reputational, environmental and social, and other risks. Examples of such risk factors include the economic, financial, and other impacts of pandemics, including the COVID-19 pandemic; general business and economic conditions in the regions in which the Bank operates; geopolitical risk; the ability of the Bank to execute on long-term strategies and shorter-term key strategic priorities, including the successful completion of acquisitions and dispositions, business retention plans, and strategic plans; technology and cyber security risk (including cyber-attacks or data security breaches) on the Bank’s information technology, internet, network access or other voice or data communications systems or services; model risk; fraud activity; the failure of third parties to comply with their obligations to the Bank or its affiliates, including relating to the care and control of information, and other risks arising from the Bank’s use of third-party service providers; the impact of new and changes to, or application of, current laws and regulations, including without limitation tax laws, capital guidelines and liquidity regulatory guidance and the bank recapitalization “bail-in” regime; regulatory oversight and compliance risk; increased competition from incumbents and new entrants (including Fintechs and big technology competitors); shifts in consumer attitudes and disruptive technology; exposure related to significant litigation and regulatory matters; ability of the Bank to attract, develop, and retain key talent; changes to the Bank’s credit ratings; changes in currency and interest rates (including the possibility of negative interest rates); increased funding costs and market volatility due to market illiquidity and competition for funding; Interbank Offered Rate (IBOR) transition risk; critical accounting estimates and changes to accounting standards, policies, and methods used by the Bank; existing and potential international debt crises; environmental and social risk (including climate change); and the occurrence of natural and unnatural catastrophic events and claims resulting from such events. The Bank cautions that the preceding list is not exhaustive of all possible risk factors and other factors could also adversely affect the Bank’s results. For more detailed information, please refer to the “Risk Factors and Management” section of the 2021 MD&A, as may be updated in subsequently filed quarterly reports to shareholders and news releases (as applicable) related to any events or transactions discussed under the heading “Pending Acquisition” or “Significant and Subsequent Events and Pending Acquisitions” in the relevant MD&A, which applicable releases may be found on www.td.com. All such factors, as well as other uncertainties and potential events, and the inherent uncertainty of forward-looking statements, should be considered carefully when making decisions with respect to the Bank. The Bank cautions readers not to place undue reliance on the Bank’s forward-looking statements.

Material economic assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements contained in this document are set out in the 2021 MD&A under the headings “Economic Summary and Outlook” and “The Bank’s Response to COVID-19”, under the headings “Key Priorities for 2022” and “Operating Environment and Outlook” for the Canadian Retail, U.S. Retail, and Wholesale Banking segments, and under the heading “Focus for 2022” for the Corporate segment, each as may be updated in subsequently filed quarterly reports to shareholders.

Any forward-looking statements contained in this document represent the views of management only as of the date hereof and are presented for the purpose of assisting the Bank’s shareholders and analysts in understanding the Bank’s financial position, objectives and priorities and anticipated financial performance as at and for the periods ended on the dates presented, and may not be appropriate for other purposes. The Bank does not undertake to update any forward-looking statements, whether written or oral, that may be made from time to time by or on its behalf, except as required under applicable securities legislation.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

In addition to reported results, the Bank also presents certain financial measures, including non-GAAP financial measures that are historical, non-GAAP ratios, supplementary financial measures and capital management measures, to assess its results. Non-GAAP financial measures, such as “adjusted” results, are utilized to assess the Bank’s businesses and to measure the Bank’s overall performance. To arrive at adjusted results, the Bank adjusts reported results for “items of note”. Items of note are items which management does not believe are indicative of underlying business performance. Non-GAAP ratios include a non-GAAP financial measure as one or more of its components. Examples of non-GAAP ratios include adjusted basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS), adjusted dividend payout ratio, adjusted efficiency ratio, and adjusted effective income tax rate. The Bank believes that non-GAAP financial measures and non-GAAP ratios provide the reader with a better understanding of how management views the Bank’s performance. Non-GAAP financial measures and non-GAAP ratios used in this document are not defined terms under IFRS and, therefore, may not be comparable to similar terms used by other issuers. For more information of a general nature, see “How the Bank Reports” in the Bank’s third quarter 2022 MD&A.

About TD Bank Group

The Toronto-Dominion Bank and its subsidiaries are collectively known as TD Bank Group (“TD” or the “Bank”). TD is the sixth largest bank in North America by assets and serves more than 27 million customers in four key businesses operating in a number of locations in financial centres around the globe: Canadian Personal and Commercial Banking, including TD Canada Trust and TD Auto Finance Canada; U.S. Retail, including TD Bank, America’s Most Convenient Bank®, TD Auto Finance U.S., TD Wealth (U.S.), and an investment in The Charles Schwab Corporation; Wealth Management and Insurance, including TD Wealth (Canada), TD Direct Investing, and TD Insurance; and Wholesale Banking, including TD Securities. TD also ranks among the world’s leading online financial services firms, with more than 15 million active online and mobile customers. TD had $1.8 trillion in assets on July 31, 2022. The Toronto-Dominion Bank trades under the symbol “TD” on the Toronto and New York Stock Exchanges.

SEGMENTED INFORMATION

For management reporting purposes, commencing the fourth quarter of 2022, the Bank reports its results under four key business segments: Canadian Personal and Commercial Banking, which includes the results of the Canadian personal and commercial banking businesses, and TD Auto Finance Canada; U.S. Retail, which includes the results of U.S. personal and business banking, TD Auto Finance U.S., the U.S. wealth business, and the Bank’s investment in Schwab; Wealth Management and Insurance; and Wholesale Banking. The Bank’s other activities are grouped into the Corporate segment. The comparative period results have been adjusted accordingly to reflect the new segment alignment.

Canadian Personal and Commercial Banking provides financial products and services to personal, small business and commercial customers, and includes TD Auto Finance Canada. U.S. Retail is comprised of the personal and business banking in the U.S. operating under the brand TD Bank, America’s Most Convenient Bank®, primarily in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic regions and Florida, TD Auto Finance U.S., and the U.S. wealth business, including Epoch and the Bank’s equity investment in Schwab. Wealth Management and Insurance includes the Canadian wealth business which provides investment products and services to institutional and retail investors, and the insurance business which provides property and casualty insurance, as well as life and health insurance products to customers across Canada. Wholesale Banking provides a wide range of capital markets, investment banking, and corporate banking products and services, including underwriting and distribution of new debt and equity issues, providing advice on strategic acquisitions and divestitures, and meeting the daily trading, funding, and investment needs of the Bank’s clients. The Bank’s other activities are grouped into the Corporate segment. The Corporate segment includes the effects of certain asset securitization programs, treasury management, elimination of taxable equivalent adjustments and other management reclassifications, corporate level tax items, and residual unallocated revenue and expenses.

The results of each business segment reflect revenue, expenses, and assets generated by the businesses in that segment. Due to the complexity of the Bank, its management reporting model uses various estimates, assumptions, allocations, and risk-based methodologies for funds transfer pricing, inter-segment revenue, income tax rates, capital, indirect expenses and cost transfers to measure business segment results. The basis of allocation and methodologies are reviewed periodically to align with management’s evaluation of the Bank’s business segments. Transfer pricing of funds is generally applied at market rates. Intersegment revenue is negotiated between each business segment and approximates the fair value of the services provided. Income tax provision or recovery is generally applied to each segment based on a statutory tax rate and may be adjusted for items and activities unique to each segment. Amortization of intangibles acquired as a result of business combinations is included in the Corporate segment. Accordingly, net income for business segments is presented before amortization of these intangibles.

Non-interest income is earned by the Bank primarily through investment and securities services, credit fees, trading income, service charges, card services, and insurance revenues. Revenues from investment and securities services are earned predominantly in the Wealth Management and Insurance segment. Revenues from credit fees are primarily earned in the Wholesale Banking and Canadian Personal and Commercial Banking segments. Trading income is earned within Wholesale Banking. Both service charges and card services revenue are mainly earned in the U.S. Retail and Canadian Personal and Commercial Banking segments. Insurance revenue is earned in the Wealth Management and Insurance segment.

Net interest income within Wholesale Banking is calculated on a taxable equivalent basis (TEB), which means that the value of non-taxable or tax-exempt income, including dividends, is adjusted to its equivalent before-tax value. Using TEB allows the Bank to measure income from all securities and loans consistently and makes for a more meaningful comparison of net interest income with similar institutions. The TEB adjustment reflected in Wholesale Banking is reversed in the Corporate segment.

Results by Business Segment1

(millions of Canadian dollars)

Canadian Personal

Wealth

and Commercial

Management

Wholesale

Banking

U.S. Retail

and Insurance

Banking2

Corporate2

Total 

For the three months ended July 31

2022

2021

2022

2021

2022

2021

2022

2021

2022

2021

2022

2021

Net interest income

$

3,199

$

2,848

$

2,453

$

1,990

$

249

$

196

$

786

$

632

$

357

$

338

$

7,044

$

6,004

Non-interest income

1,061

953

648

691

2,511

2,582

290

451

(629)

31

3,881

4,708

Total revenue

4,260

3,801

3,101

2,681

2,760

2,778

1,076

1,083

(272)

369

10,925

10,712

Provision for (recovery of)

credit losses

170

99

107

(96)

1

25

2

49

(43)

351

(37)

Insurance claims and related

expenses

829

836

829

836

Non-interest expenses

1,807

1,655

1,715

1,518

1,150

1,093

691

635

733

715

6,096

5,616

Income (loss) before income

taxes and share of net income

from investment in Schwab

2,283

2,047

1,279

1,259

781

848

360

446

(1,054)

(303)

3,649

4,297

Provision for (recovery of)

income taxes

605

544

126

161

206

226

89

116

(323)

(125)

703

922

Share of net income from

investment in Schwab 3,4

289

197

(21)

(27)

268

170

Net income (loss)

$

1,678

$

1,503

$

1,442

$

1,295

$

575

$

622

$

271

$

330

$

(752)

$

(205)

$

3,214

$

3,545

Results by Business Segment (continued)1

(millions of Canadian dollars)

Canadian Personal

Wealth

and Commercial

Management

Wholesale

Banking

U.S. Retail

and Insurance

Banking2

Corporate2

Total 

For the nine months ended July 31

2022

2021

2022

2021

2022

2021

2022

2021

2022

2021

2022

2021

Net interest income

$

9,008

$

8,332

$

6,647

$

5,971

$

673

$

563

$

2,254

$

1,941

$

1,141

$

1,062

$

19,723

$

17,869

Non-interest income

3,124

2,731

2,183

2,007

7,556

7,360

1,418

1,609

(535)

176

13,746

13,883

Total revenue

12,132

11,063

8,830

7,978

8,229

7,923

3,672

3,550

606

1,238

33,469

31,752

Provision for (recovery of)

credit losses

262

203

110

(174)

1

2

11

(41)

66

(91)

450

(101)

Insurance claims and related

expenses

2,177

2,057

2,177

2,057

Non-interest expenses

5,255

4,928

4,944

4,800

3,503

3,163

2,231

2,051

2,163

2,187

18,096

17,129

Income (loss) before income

taxes and share of

net income from

investment in Schwab

6,615

5,932

3,776

3,352

2,548

2,701

1,430

1,540

(1,623)

(858)

12,746

12,667

Provision for (recovery of)

income taxes

1,751

1,576

460

393

669

713

366

390

(557)

(361)

2,689

2,711

Share of net income from

investment in Schwab3,4

765

652

(64)

(91)

701

561

Net income (loss)

$

4,864

$

4,356

$

4,081

$

3,611

$

1,879

$

1,988

$

1,064

$

1,150

$

(1,130)

$

(588)

$

10,758

$

10,517

Results by Business Segment1

(millions of Canadian dollars)

Canadian Personal

Wealth

and Commercial

Management

Wholesale

Banking

U.S. Retail

and Insurance

Banking2

Corporate2

Total 

For the years ended October 31

2021

2020

2021

2020

2021

2020

2021

2020

2021

2020

2021

2020

Net interest income

$

11,195

$

11,289

$

8,074

$

8,834

$

762

$

772

$

2,630

$

1,990

$

1,470

$

1,612

$

24,131

$

24,497

Non-interest income

3,722

3,415

2,684

2,438

9,827

8,857

2,070

2,968

259

1,471

18,562

19,149

Total revenue

14,917

14,704

10,758

11,272

10,589

9,629

4,700

4,958

1,729

3,083

42,693

43,646

Provision for (recovery of)

credit losses

256

2,746

(250)

2,925

2

(118)

508

(114)

1,063

(224)

7,242

Insurance claims and related

expenses

2,707

2,886

2,707

2,886

Non-interest expenses

6,648

6,499

6,417

6,579

4,355

3,942

2,709

2,518

2,947

2,066

23,076

21,604

Income (loss) before income

taxes and share of net

income from investment in

Schwab and TD Ameritrade

8,013

5,459

4,591

1,768

3,525

2,801

2,109

1,932

(1,104)

(46)

17,134

11,914

Provision for (recovery of)

income taxes

2,128

1,463

504

(167)

929

771

539

514

(479)

(1,429)

3,621

1,152

Share of net income from

investment in Schwab and

TD Ameritrade3,4

898

1,091

(113)

42

785

1,133

Net income (loss)

$

5,885

$

3,996

$

4,985

$

3,026

$

2,596

$

2,030

$

1,570

$

1,418

$

(738)

$

1,425

$

14,298

$

11,895

1  The retailer program partners’ share of revenues and credit losses is presented in the Corporate segment, with an offsetting amount (representing the partners’ net share) recorded in Non-interest expenses, resulting in no impact to Corporate reported Net income (loss). The Net income (loss) included in the U.S. Retail segment includes only the portion of revenue and credit losses attributable to the Bank under the agreements.

2  Net interest income within Wholesale Banking is calculated on a taxable equivalent basis (TEB). The TEB adjustment reflected in Wholesale Banking is reversed in the Corporate segment.

The after-tax amounts for amortization of acquired intangibles and the Bank’s share of acquisition and integration charges associated with Schwab’s acquisition of TD Ameritrade are recorded in the Corporate segment.

The Bank’s share of Schwab’s earnings is reported with a one-month lag. Refer to Note 7 of the Bank’s third quarter 2022 Interim Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details.

 

Total Assets by Business Segment

(millions of Canadian dollars)

Canadian Personal

Wealth

and Commercial

Management

Wholesale

Banking

U.S. Retail

and Insurance

Banking 

Corporate 

Total 

As at July 31, 2022

Total assets

$

519,327

$

576,952

$

24,189

$

579,825

$

140,518

$

1,840,811

As at October 31, 2021

Total assets

$

484,857

$

559,503

$

24,579

$

514,681

$

145,052

$

1,728,672

As at October 31, 2020

Total assets

$

449,656

$

566,629

$

22,714

$

512,886

$

163,980

$

1,715,865

 

SOURCE TD Bank Group

For further information: Brooke Hales, Vice President, Investor Relations, 416-307-8647, Brooke.hales@td.com; Elizabeth Goldenshtein, Senior Manager, Media Relations, 647-625-3124, Elizabeth.goldenshtein@td.com

DOD Financial Management: Additional Actions Would Improve Reporting of Joint Strike Fighter Assets

DOD Financial Management: Additional Actions Would Improve Reporting of Joint Strike Fighter Assets
Department of Defense The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment together with the F-35 Program Executive Officer, and in coordination with the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller), should develop and document a comprehensive strategy to address the JSF material weakness. The strategy should include (1) complete, detailed procedures; (2) time frames based on an analysis of the time needed to accomplish the procedures; and (3) resources required to design and implement the procedures. (Recommendation 1)

Open

When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.

Department of Defense The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment together with the F-35 Program Executive Officer should develop and document a plan for verifying the completeness of JSF assets recorded in its APSR, including conducting an analysis and documenting the results on the feasibility of performing a wall-to-wall inventory to capture all JSF assets. (Recommendation 2)

Open

When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.

Department of Defense The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment together with the F-35 Program Executive Officer should develop procedures for performing physical inventories of JSF assets held at DOD and international partner facilities. To the extent that the procedures include the F-35 JPO relying on these facilities’ staff to perform the physical inventory counts, the office should develop and document a plan that describes how the F-35 JPO plans to review the results of these inventory procedures in order to verify the existence and completeness of the recorded amounts of JSF assets at these locations. (Recommendation 3)

Open

When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.

Department of Defense The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment together with the F-35 Program Executive Officer should develop procedures for performing periodic physical inventories once the initial inventory count has been completed, including how DOD will assess the resources and time needed to conduct the inventories and any sampling methodology intended to be used. (Recommendation 4)

Open

When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.

Department of Defense The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment together with the F-35 Program Executive Officer should develop procedures that outline the steps to periodically capture and verify the accuracy and completeness of JSF asset data from contractors and other DOD sources to be recorded in DPAS until a direct interface with the prime contractors’ systems has been established. (Recommendation 5)

Open

When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.

Department of Defense The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment together with the F-35 Program Executive Officer should finalize the business rules within DPAS to identify and populate default characters for missing data elements in JSF asset property records. (Recommendation 6)

Open

When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.

Department of Defense The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment together with the F-35 Program Executive Officer, and in consultation with the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller), should finalize and implement procedures to calculate deemed cost for all JSF assets that lack documentation of historical cost data. The procedures should include the preferred deemed cost valuation methodologies and steps to prepare and retain supporting documentation for all property records created using deemed cost. (Recommendation 7)

Open

When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.

Department of Defense The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment together with the F-35 Program Executive Officer should develop procedures to capture and record new JSF asset transactions and retain supporting documentation to support the recorded transactions after beginning balances are recorded using deemed cost. (Recommendation 8)

Open

When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.

Department of Defense The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment together with the F-35 Program Executive Officer should identify a complete list of JSF software applications that meet DOD’s reporting criteria. (Recommendation 9)

Open

When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.

Department of Defense The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment together with the F-35 Program Executive Officer should develop policies and procedures to record and report new JSF internal-use software development costs. (Recommendation 10)

Open

When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.

Department of Defense The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment together with the F-35 Program Executive Officer should analyze the significance of purchase-related subsequent transportation costs on financial reporting of JSF asset balances. As needed, the office should either document the decision and rationale for not capturing these costs or develop policies and procedures for capturing and recording JSF asset purchase-related subsequent transportation costs for financial reporting. (Recommendation 11)

Open

When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.

Department of Defense The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, in collaboration with the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller), should determine and document whether information on joint programs needed for reporting purposes is sufficiently maintained and whether a central data source and standard definition would be appropriate to help ensure consistent, complete, and accurate tracking, recording, and reporting of joint program information. (Recommendation 12)

Open

When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.