Stocks extend rally despite negative GDP data

Stocks extend rally despite negative GDP data

U.S. stocks rose sharply Thursday even as new data showed financial action contracted for the next-straight quarter in Q2.

The benchmark S&P 500 index climbed 1.2{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}, bringing overall gains for the index in the two times quickly subsequent the Federal Reserve’s fee boost to roughly 3.8{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} — its very best rally ever after a hike, going back again to info from 1970, Carson Team Chief Market Strategist Ryan Detrick points out.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average additional 330 factors, or 1{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}, and the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite sophisticated by around 1.1{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}.

Earnings from Apple (AAPL) and Amazon (AMZN) are thanks out immediately after the bell.

Details from the Commerce Section early Thursday showed GDP fell at an annualized charge of .9{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} last quarter, after U.S. economic exercise unexpectedly fell 1.6{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} in Q1. Two straight adverse GDP prints satisfies the unofficial definition of a recession.

Thursday’s moves appear immediately after the Federal Reserve sent an envisioned desire fee raise of 75 basis details Wednesday afternoon and instructed it may possibly slow the speed of its charge climbing cycle.

The most up-to-date GDP report is absolutely sure to go on the discussion between buyers about no matter if the U.S. financial system is in economic downturn, with lots of market contributors judging two-straight quarters of decrease advancement as conference the unofficial definition.

White Residence officials have in recent times, even so, been eager to remind the general public that recessions are formally termed by the NBER, which defines recession as, “a significant decline in economic action that is unfold throughout the financial state and that lasts far more than a several months.”

Somewhere else on the economic info calendar, the weekly report on preliminary jobless statements confirmed a slight moderation in first-time filings for unemployment insurance, totaling 256,000 past week right after 261,000 filings the prior 7 days.

Nonetheless, jobless claims information have been on a modest upward development over the last many weeks.

On the earnings aspect, shares of Meta (META) fell about 5{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} right after the Fb guardian organization described 2nd-quarter earnings late Wednesday that fell limited of analyst estimates. The quarter also marked the social media giant’s initially year-in excess of-12 months income decrease.

The company also reduce its cost forecast yet again, and on a call with analysts CEO Mark Zuckerberg said, “we seem to be to have entered an financial downturn that will have a broad influence on the digital promotion enterprise. It’s often tough to forecast how deep or how prolonged these cycles will be, but I might say that the problem would seem even worse than it did a quarter in the past.”

Zuckerberg extra: “In this surroundings, we’re targeted on building the prolonged time period investments that will placement us to be more robust coming out of this downturn — like our do the job on our discovery motor and Reels, our new adverts infrastructure, and the metaverse. We’re also targeted on becoming demanding about measuring returns and sizing these investments effectively.”

The logos of Amazon, Apple, Facebook and Google are seen in a combination photo from Reuters files.    REUTERS/File Photos

The logos of Amazon, Apple, Facebook and Google are viewed in a combination photograph from Reuters information. REUTERS/File Shots

On the shift:

  • Meta (META) shares fell 5{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} following the Fb father or mother company reported 2nd-quarter earnings late Wednesday that fell short of analyst estimates. The quarter also marked the social media giant’s 1st year-above-year earnings decrease.

  • Comcast (CMCSA) shares sank about 9.1{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} immediately after the media huge reported broadband subscribers were flat in its next-quarter earnings results, the to start with time ever the company unsuccessful to incorporate new subscribers.

  • Ford (F) inventory rose virtually 6.1{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} following the Detroit-based mostly carmakers reported Q2 earnings that topped Wall Road anticipations on income and financial gain and reaffirmed its steering, countering some recessionary concerns. The vehicle giant also boosted its inventory dividend to 15 cents for every share.

  • Teladoc (TDOC) shares lose approximately 1 fifth of their benefit just after the the enterprise documented a loss for the 2nd quarter and a week outlook.

Alexandra Semenova is a reporter for Yahoo Finance. Stick to her on Twitter @alexandraandnyc

Click here for the hottest inventory marketplace information and in-depth analysis, together with occasions that move shares

Read through the most up-to-date monetary and company news from Yahoo Finance

Download the Yahoo Finance app for Apple or Android

Stick to Yahoo Finance on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, Flipboard, LinkedIn, and YouTube

Stocks sink as Dimon warns of ‘negative consequences’ from inflation, Fed

Stocks sink as Dimon warns of ‘negative consequences’ from inflation, Fed

U.S. stocks fell Thursday as buyers reeled from shock inflation knowledge and digested earnings from some of Wall Street’s big financial institutions.

The S&P 500 and Dow each dropped 1.9{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} soon following the open up, though the tech-hefty Nasdaq tumbled nearer to 1.7{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} early into the session.

JPMorgan Chase (JPM) was in the spotlight Thursday immediately after reporting a wider-than-expected fall in next-quarter gain of 28{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}, attributing the decline to a $1.1 billion in provision for credit history losses amid issues in excess of a doable financial downturn. Shares slid as significantly as 5{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} at the commence of trading.

“In our world economy, we are dealing with two conflicting factors, working on distinctive timetables,” CEO Jamie Dimon explained. “The U.S. financial state proceeds to increase and both of those the work current market and shopper expending, and their potential to spend, continue to be healthier.”

JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon speaks at the North America's Building Trades Unions (NABTU) 2019 legislative conference in Washington, U.S., April 9, 2019. REUTERS/Jeenah Moon

JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon speaks at the North America’s Building Trades Unions (NABTU) 2019 legislative convention in Washington, U.S., April 9, 2019. REUTERS/Jeenah Moon

“But geopolitical stress, significant inflation, waning consumer self-confidence, the uncertainty about how significant rates have to go and the never-just before-noticed quantitative tightening and their consequences on world wide liquidity, combined with the war in Ukraine and its damaging influence on world-wide energy and food items price ranges are incredibly likely to have negative repercussions on the world-wide economic climate someday down the street,” Dimon added.

Morgan Stanley (MS) unveiled effects that skipped analyst anticipations, dragged down generally by a slump in financial investment banking revenue thanks to unstable market situations. Shares fell over 2{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} early Thursday.

These final results also weighed on the broader economic sector, sending shares of financial institution peers Citi (C) and Wells Fargo (WFC) down over 2{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} ahead of their individual earnings on Friday.

The moves across equity marketplaces arrive after all three important indexes tumbled Wednesday adhering to new CPI information that confirmed costs throughout the U.S. economy surged at the fastest rate because 1981.

Elsewhere on Thursday early morning, original jobless claims edged larger previous week in a prospective indication the labor industry might be cooling as the Federal Reserve tightens economical conditions.

1st-time filings for unemployment insurance in the U.S. elevated to 244,000 in the week finished July 9, up by 9,000 from the prior interval, Labor Department details confirmed Thursday morning. Economists surveyed by Bloomberg had anticipated the most recent figure to come in at 235,000.

The producer value index for remaining desire — a gauge of wholesale and business charges — surged 11.3{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} year-in excess of-calendar year in June and 1.1{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} from the prior thirty day period, the Labor Section also described Thursday, underscoring inflationary pressures at the wholesale level.

Meanwhile, commodity marketplaces remained below pressure on climbing worries of a supply crunch. West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude futures fell by $2.24, or 2.33{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} to $94.06 for every barrel in the early trade, and Brent Crude Oil fell by $1.94, or 1.95{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}, to $97.63.

“Markets had a knee-jerk response just after the eye-popping inflation quantities and the headline range of 9.1{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} only makes the career that significantly more challenging for the Fed,” Allianz Investment Administration Senior Investment Strategist Charlie Ripley claimed. “As a result, the Fed is possible going to send a hawkish concept at the July meeting, and it would be a slip-up to consider that a level hike much less than 75 basis points is in the playing cards.”

The blowout headline figure even spurred a wave of speculation among strategists that an maximize of 100 foundation factors might now be on the desk — a move that would mark the most combative monetary intervention since the early 1990s.

“Everything is in play,” Atlanta Fed President Raphael Bostic instructed reporters in St. Petersburg, Florida on Wednesday. When asked if that bundled lifting interest charges by a comprehensive proportion point, he mentioned, “it would mean all the things.

Alexandra Semenova is a reporter for Yahoo Finance. Abide by her on Twitter @alexandraandnyc

Click listed here for the latest stock current market news and in-depth analysis, including situations that move shares

Examine the most current financial and business enterprise news from Yahoo Finance

Obtain the Yahoo Finance application for Apple or Android

Follow Yahoo Finance on Twitter, Fb, Instagram, Flipboard, LinkedIn, and YouTube

Elon Musk calls for increase in US oil, gas production to combat Russia despite negative effect on Tesla

Elon Musk calls for increase in US oil, gas production to combat Russia despite negative effect on Tesla

Tesla co-founder and CEO Elon Musk referred to as on the United States to increase its domestic oil output in reaction to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, while also acknowledging that his electrical car company would be negatively impacted by that go.

“Dislike to say it, but we want to boost oil & gas output instantly,” Musk tweeted Friday. “Incredible situations desire remarkable actions.”

(Photo by Patrick Pleul - Pool/Getty Images)

GRUENHEIDE, GERMANY – AUGUST 13: Tesla CEO Elon Musk  ((Photo by Patrick Pleul – Pool/Getty Visuals) / Getty Photos)

REPUBLICANS, Electricity Authorities SAY KEYSTONE XL CANCELLED BY BIDEN WOULD HAVE Helped Lessen Require FOR RUSSIAN OIL

Musk extra, “Clearly, this would negatively impact Tesla, but sustainable power methods just are unable to respond instantaneously to make up for Russian oil & fuel exports.”

The Biden administration has faced elevated criticism from each sides of the aisle in the latest days for not accomplishing much more to concentrate on American power creation in response to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, which has disrupted power marketplaces globally. 

BLINKEN States ‘NO STRATEGIC INTEREST’ IN RUSSIA Electricity SANCTIONS, RESISTS Phone calls FOR OIL IMPORT BAN

Additionally, reviews have revealed that the U.S. is getting 650,000 barrels a day from Russia, which some have argued is basically funding Russian President Vladimir Putin’s war equipment.

Russian President Vladimir Putin  (Yuri Kochetkov/Pool Picture by using AP / AP Newsroom)

Russia is the producer of one particular out of every 10 barrels of oil eaten by the globe, in accordance to the New York Situations, generating it the third-premier oil producer in the planet.

On Friday, Secretary of Condition Antony Blinken downplayed the idea of sanctioning Russia’s strength sector arguing that the United States has “no strategic interest” in performing so. 

Musk’s initial Twitter article was retweeted nearly 20,000 occasions in 30 minutes of staying posted. 

Click In this article TO GET THE FOX Information Application

“Founder of electric powered automobile enterprise suggests drill toddler drill!” AEI Senior Fellow Marc Thiessen responded. 

“Knowledge from gentleman whose organization would not be helped by what he is recommending,” Fox News Senior Political Analyst Brit Hume tweeted. 

A woman cries outside houses damaged by a Russian airstrike

A lady cries outside the house properties ruined by a Russian airstrike (AP Photo/Vadim Ghirda / AP Newsroom)

“America is funding Russia’s war by getting Russian oil and gasoline somewhat than making our own,” Republican Congresswoman Lauren Boebert responded.

Minutes soon after the simply call to maximize oil manufacturing, Musk tweeted yet again displaying solidarity with the people of Ukraine.

“Keep robust Ukraine,” Musk tweeted. “And also my sympathies to the good men and women of Russia, who do not want this.”

Yuzhou Group Holdings Company Limited — Moody’s downgrades Yuzhou to Caa2/Caa3; outlook negative

Rating Action: Moody’s downgrades Yuzhou to Caa2/Caa3; outlook negativeGlobal Credit Research – 10 Jan 2022Hong Kong, January 10, 2022 — Moody’s Investors Service has downgraded the corporate family rating (CFR) of Yuzhou Group Holdings Company Limited to Caa2 from B2. At the same time, Moody’s has downgraded the company’s senior unsecured rating on the bonds to Caa3 from B3.The outlook on the ratings remains negative.”The downgrade reflects Yuzhou’s increased refinancing risks driven by its weakened funding access and sizable amount of maturing debt,” says Celine Yang, a Moody’s Vice President and Senior Analyst.”The negative outlook reflects the uncertainty over the company’s ability to mobilize all of its cash to manage its refinancing needs over the next 6-12 months,” adds Yang.RATINGS RATIONALEMoody’s expects Yuzhou’s refinancing risks to heighten as it faces difficulties in raising new funds from onshore and offshore channels to address its maturing debts amid a tight credit environment. In particular, the company has a large amount of onshore and offshore debt maturing by the end of December 2022 — including around USD700 million of offshore bonds and RMB6.5 billion of onshore bond maturing or becoming puttable during the period. In particular, Yuzhou has a total of around USD590 million bonds maturing in January 2022.As of 30 June 2021, the company had unrestricted cash of RMB25 billion, compared with reported short-term debt of RMB15.2 billion. But Moody’s believes there is uncertainty for the company to mobilize all the cash, particularly for the cash holdings at the project and operating companies’ levels, for debt repayment.Moody’s also expects Yuzhou’s contracted sales to decline over the next 6-12 months, driven by weaker homebuyer confidence amid tight funding conditions. This will weaken the company’s operating cash flow and, in turn, its liquidity.Yuzhou’s Caa2 CFR is constrained by its high refinancing risk, weakened liquidity and funding access, as well as its weak credit metrics and high reliance on sales from joint ventures (JVs) and associates, which constrain its corporate transparency and increases uncertainty over its accessibility to the cash at the JV level.Yuzhou’s Caa3 senior unsecured bond rating is one notch below its CFR because of the risk of structural subordination. This subordination risk reflects the fact that most of Yuzhou’s claims are at the operating subsidiaries and have priority over claims at the holding company in a bankruptcy scenario. In addition, the holding company lacks significant mitigating factors for structural subordination. As a result, the expected recovery rate for claims at the holding company will be lower.In terms of environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors, Moody’s has considered Yuzhou’s concentrated ownership given the controlling shareholder, Mr. Lam Lung On, holds a 58.81{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} stake in the company as of 30 June 2021. Yuzhou had a relatively high dividend payout ratio of 46.8{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} in 2019, compared with 35{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}-36.5{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} in the previous four years.FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGSMoody’s could downgrade the ratings if Yuzhou’s funding access further weakens or if it defaults on its upcoming maturities.Given the negative outlook, a rating upgrade is unlikely. However, positive rating momentum could develop if the company strengthens its liquidity and significantly improves its operating cash flow.The principal methodology used in these ratings was Homebuilding And Property Development Industry published in January 2018 and available at https://www.moodys.com/researchdocumentcontentpage.aspx?docid=PBC_1108031. Alternatively, please see the Rating Methodologies page on www.moodys.com for a copy of this methodology.Yuzhou Group Holdings Company Limited is a property developer that focuses on residential housing in the Yangtze River Delta and the West Strait Economic Zone. Established in Xiamen in the mid-1990s, Yuzhou is one of the city’s largest developers. The company moved its headquarters to Shanghai in 2016, and launched Shanghai-Shenzhen dual headquarters in 2020.Yuzhou listed its shares on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange in 2009. As of 30 June 2021, Yuzhou’s land bank totaled 22 million square meters in saleable gross floor area.REGULATORY DISCLOSURESFor further specification of Moody’s key rating assumptions and sensitivity analysis, see the sections Methodology Assumptions and Sensitivity to Assumptions in the disclosure form. Moody’s Rating Symbols and Definitions can be found at: https://www.moodys.com/researchdocumentcontentpage.aspx?docid=PBC_79004.For ratings issued on a program, series, category/class of debt or security this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series, category/class of debt, security or pursuant to a program for which the ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody’s rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the credit rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular credit rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider’s credit rating. For provisional ratings, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would have affected the rating. For further information please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com.For any affected securities or rated entities receiving direct credit support from the primary entity(ies) of this credit rating action, and whose ratings may change as a result of this credit rating action, the associated regulatory disclosures will be those of the guarantor entity. Exceptions to this approach exist for the following disclosures, if applicable to jurisdiction: Ancillary Services, Disclosure to rated entity, Disclosure from rated entity.The ratings have been disclosed to the rated entity or its designated agent(s) and issued with no amendment resulting from that disclosure.These ratings are solicited. Please refer to Moody’s Policy for Designating and Assigning Unsolicited Credit Ratings available on its website www.moodys.com.Moody’s considers a rated entity or its agent(s) to be participating when it maintains an overall relationship with Moody’s. Unless noted in the Regulatory Disclosures as a Non-Participating Entity, the rated entity is participating and the rated entity or its agent(s) generally provides Moody’s with information for the purposes of its ratings process. Please refer to www.moodys.com for the Regulatory Disclosures for each credit rating action under the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page and for details of Moody’s Policy for Designating Non-Participating Rated Entities.Regulatory disclosures contained in this press release apply to the credit rating and, if applicable, the related rating outlook or rating review.Moody’s general principles for assessing environmental, social and governance (ESG) risks in our credit analysis can be found at http://www.moodys.com/researchdocumentcontentpage.aspx?docid=PBC_1288235.The Global Scale Credit Rating on this Credit Rating Announcement was issued by one of Moody’s affiliates outside the EU and is endorsed by Moody’s Deutschland GmbH, An der Welle 5, Frankfurt am Main 60322, Germany, in accordance with Art.4 paragraph 3 of the Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 on Credit Rating Agencies. Further information on the EU endorsement status and on the Moody’s office that issued the credit rating is available on www.moodys.com.The Global Scale Credit Rating on this Credit Rating Announcement was issued by one of Moody’s affiliates outside the UK and is endorsed by Moody’s Investors Service Limited, One Canada Square, Canary Wharf, London E14 5FA under the law applicable to credit rating agencies in the UK. Further information on the UK endorsement status and on the Moody’s office that issued the credit rating is available on www.moodys.com.Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to the lead rating analyst and to the Moody’s legal entity that has issued the rating.Please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for additional regulatory disclosures for each credit rating.The first name below is the lead rating analyst for this Credit Rating and the last name below is the person primarily responsible for approving this Credit Rating. YuYing (Celine) Yang Vice President – Senior Analyst Corporate Finance Group Moody’s Investors Service Hong Kong Ltd. 24/F One Pacific Place 88 Queensway Hong Kong China (Hong Kong S.A.R.) JOURNALISTS: 852 3758 1350 Client Service: 852 3551 3077 Franco Leung Associate Managing Director Corporate Finance Group JOURNALISTS: 852 3758 1350 Client Service: 852 3551 3077 Releasing Office: Moody’s Investors Service Hong Kong Ltd. 24/F One Pacific Place 88 Queensway Hong Kong China (Hong Kong S.A.R.) JOURNALISTS: 852 3758 1350 Client Service: 852 3551 3077 © 2022 Moody’s Corporation, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Moody’s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, “MOODY’S”). All rights reserved.CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS AFFILIATES ARE THEIR CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MATERIALS, PRODUCTS, SERVICES AND INFORMATION PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S (COLLECTIVELY, “PUBLICATIONS”) MAY INCLUDE SUCH CURRENT OPINIONS. MOODY’S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT OR IMPAIRMENT. SEE APPLICABLE MOODY’S RATING SYMBOLS AND DEFINITIONS PUBLICATION FOR INFORMATION ON THE TYPES OF CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS ADDRESSED BY MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS, NON-CREDIT ASSESSMENTS (“ASSESSMENTS”), AND OTHER OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S ANALYTICS, INC. AND/OR ITS AFFILIATES. MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS DO NOT COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY’S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS AND OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLISHES ITS PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS, AND PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS OR PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER.ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY’S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY ANY PERSON AS A BENCHMARK AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED FOR REGULATORY PURPOSES AND MUST NOT BE USED IN ANY WAY THAT COULD RESULT IN THEM BEING CONSIDERED A BENCHMARK.All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY’S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind. MOODY’S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY’S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY’S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing its Publications.To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY’S.To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information.NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY CREDIT RATING, ASSESSMENT, OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY’S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Corporation (“MCO”), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any credit rating, agreed to pay to Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. for credit ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,000 to approximately $5,000,000. MCO and Moody’s Investors Service also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of Moody’s Investors Service credit ratings and credit rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold credit ratings from Moody’s Investors Service and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance — Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy.”Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY’S affiliate, Moody’s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody’s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to “wholesale clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY’S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a “wholesale client” and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to “retail clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY’S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors.Additional terms for Japan only: Moody’s Japan K.K. (“MJKK”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody’s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody’s SF Japan K.K. (“MSFJ”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (“NRSRO”). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively.MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any credit rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for credit ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY100,000 to approximately JPY550,000,000.MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements. ​

Nissan Motor Acceptance Company LLC — Moody’s affirms at Baa3 Nissan Motor Acceptance’s long-term senior unsecured ratings; changes outlook to stable from negative

Rating Action: Moody’s affirms at Baa3 Nissan Motor Acceptance’s long-term senior unsecured ratings; changes outlook to stable from negativeGlobal Credit Research – 13 Dec 2021New York, December 13, 2021 — Moody’s Investors Service (“Moody’s”) has affirmed all the ratings for Nissan Motor Acceptance Company LLC (NMAC), including its Baa3 long-term senior unsecured ratings and its Prime-3 backed commercial paper rating. NMAC’s outlook was changed to stable from negative.The rating actions follow similar actions on the ratings for NMAC’s ultimate parent, Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. (Nissan, Baa3 stable), whose ratings were also affirmed with outlook changed to stable from negative.Affirmations:..Issuer: Nissan Motor Acceptance Company LLC….Backed Commercial Paper, Affirmed P-3….Backed Senior Unsecured Medium-Term Note Program, Affirmed (P)Baa3….Backed Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Affirmed Baa3….Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Affirmed Baa3Outlook Actions:..Issuer: Nissan Motor Acceptance Company LLC….Outlook, Changed To Stable From NegativeRATINGS RATIONALEThe ratings for NMAC reflect both its intrinsic credit quality (ba1 standalone assessment) and uplift derived from support from Nissan. NMAC’s Baa3 long-term ratings are aligned with Nissan’s Baa3 ratings, based on NMAC’s strategic significance to Nissan, Moody’s expectation that Nissan would support NMAC if required, as well as the explicit support agreement in place between the two companies.Moody’s said NMAC’s ba1 standalone assessment reflects its good capitalization that protects creditors against unexpected losses and strong liquidity. Similar to its peers, the company continues to be extremely profitable, and NMAC’s tangible equity to tangible assets remains strong (15.6{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} at 30 September 2021), despite it having made a sizeable $1.3 billion parental distribution in June 2021.Moody’s said that NMAC is the only firm among rated US auto captive companies that has an agreement with its parent wherein the parent provides an indemnification from losses associated with the lease portfolio (39{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} of managed assets at 30 September 2021), making NMAC comparatively less vulnerable to variations in used car prices. Moody’s expects the extraordinary used car price appreciation that has occurred during the coronavirus pandemic to moderate by the end of 2022. Through October 2021, used car prices increased 45{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} from 2020 levels.NMAC’s managed receivables ($38.2 billion at 30 September 2021) have declined by approximately 10{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} since last year. Moody’s expects, however, that the company’s receivables will be supported by better new vehicle sales at Nissan. Since the beginning of this year through 30 September 2021, Nissan saw an increase in sales in the US by approximately 19{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}. This compares to a decline of about 33{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} in 2020. The anticipated growth in retail portfolio may be slightly offset by declining dealer financings and uncertainty around consistency of new vehicle sales growth due to the semiconductor shortage and supply chain disruptions expected to continue partially through 2022. Other credit challenges for NMAC include its significant use of securitization that reduces the company’s ability to access alternative sources of liquidity, said Moody’s.FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGSNMAC’s ratings could be upgraded if the ratings for its parent Nissan are upgraded. An upward adjustment of NMAC’s standalone assessment is unlikely given its reliance on one car manufacturer for revenue and assets and its dependency on market funding.NMAC’s ratings could be downgraded following a downgrade of the ratings for its parent Nissan. A downward adjustment of NMAC’s standalone assessment could occur should there be a sustained material decline in asset quality and profitability, diminished liquidity, or leverage (TCE/TMA) reducing to less than 12{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}. However, a downward adjustment of NMAC’s standalone assessment without a change in Moody’s assessment of Nissan’s willingness and ability to support NMAC would likely not affect NMAC’s ratings.Headquartered in Franklin, Tennessee, Nissan Motor Acceptance Company LLC is a wholly owned subsidiary of Nissan North America, Inc., which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Nissan Motor Co., Ltd (Nissan). As of 30 September 2021, NMAC had approximately a $38 billion portfolio of finance receivables and operating leases.The methodologies used in these ratings were Finance Companies Methodology published in November 2019 and available at https://www.moodys.com/researchdocumentcontentpage.aspx?docid=PBC_1187099, and Captive Finance Subsidiaries of Nonfinancial Corporations published in August 2019 and available at https://www.moodys.com/researchdocumentcontentpage.aspx?docid=PBC_1183459. Alternatively, please see the Rating Methodologies page on www.moodys.com for a copy of these methodologies. REGULATORY DISCLOSURESFor further specification of Moody’s key rating assumptions and sensitivity analysis, see the sections Methodology Assumptions and Sensitivity to Assumptions in the disclosure form. Moody’s Rating Symbols and Definitions can be found at: https://www.moodys.com/researchdocumentcontentpage.aspx?docid=PBC_79004.For ratings issued on a program, series, category/class of debt or security this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series, category/class of debt, security or pursuant to a program for which the ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody’s rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the credit rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular credit rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider’s credit rating. For provisional ratings, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would have affected the rating. For further information please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com.For any affected securities or rated entities receiving direct credit support from the primary entity(ies) of this credit rating action, and whose ratings may change as a result of this credit rating action, the associated regulatory disclosures will be those of the guarantor entity. Exceptions to this approach exist for the following disclosures, if applicable to jurisdiction: Ancillary Services, Disclosure to rated entity, Disclosure from rated entity.The ratings have been disclosed to the rated entity or its designated agent(s) and issued with no amendment resulting from that disclosure.These ratings are solicited. Please refer to Moody’s Policy for Designating and Assigning Unsolicited Credit Ratings available on its website www.moodys.com.Regulatory disclosures contained in this press release apply to the credit rating and, if applicable, the related rating outlook or rating review.Moody’s general principles for assessing environmental, social and governance (ESG) risks in our credit analysis can be found at http://www.moodys.com/researchdocumentcontentpage.aspx?docid=PBC_1288235.The Global Scale Credit Rating on this Credit Rating Announcement was issued by one of Moody’s affiliates outside the EU and is endorsed by Moody’s Deutschland GmbH, An der Welle 5, Frankfurt am Main 60322, Germany, in accordance with Art.4 paragraph 3 of the Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 on Credit Rating Agencies. Further information on the EU endorsement status and on the Moody’s office that issued the credit rating is available on www.moodys.com.The Global Scale Credit Rating on this Credit Rating Announcement was issued by one of Moody’s affiliates outside the UK and is endorsed by Moody’s Investors Service Limited, One Canada Square, Canary Wharf, London E14 5FA under the law applicable to credit rating agencies in the UK. Further information on the UK endorsement status and on the Moody’s office that issued the credit rating is available on www.moodys.com.Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to the lead rating analyst and to the Moody’s legal entity that has issued the rating.Please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for additional regulatory disclosures for each credit rating. Inna Bodeck Vice President – Senior Analyst Financial Institutions Group Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. 250 Greenwich Street New York, NY 10007 U.S.A. JOURNALISTS: 1 212 553 0376 Client Service: 1 212 553 1653 Donald Robertson Associate Managing Director Financial Institutions Group JOURNALISTS: 1 212 553 0376 Client Service: 1 212 553 1653 Releasing Office: Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. 250 Greenwich Street New York, NY 10007 U.S.A. JOURNALISTS: 1 212 553 0376 Client Service: 1 212 553 1653 © 2021 Moody’s Corporation, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Moody’s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, “MOODY’S”). All rights reserved.CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS AFFILIATES ARE THEIR CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MATERIALS, PRODUCTS, SERVICES AND INFORMATION PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S (COLLECTIVELY, “PUBLICATIONS”) MAY INCLUDE SUCH CURRENT OPINIONS. MOODY’S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT OR IMPAIRMENT. SEE APPLICABLE MOODY’S RATING SYMBOLS AND DEFINITIONS PUBLICATION FOR INFORMATION ON THE TYPES OF CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS ADDRESSED BY MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS, NON-CREDIT ASSESSMENTS (“ASSESSMENTS”), AND OTHER OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S ANALYTICS, INC. AND/OR ITS AFFILIATES. MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS DO NOT COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY’S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS AND OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLISHES ITS PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS, AND PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS OR PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER.ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY’S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY ANY PERSON AS A BENCHMARK AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED FOR REGULATORY PURPOSES AND MUST NOT BE USED IN ANY WAY THAT COULD RESULT IN THEM BEING CONSIDERED A BENCHMARK.All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY’S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind. MOODY’S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY’S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY’S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing its Publications.To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY’S.To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information.NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY CREDIT RATING, ASSESSMENT, OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY’S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Corporation (“MCO”), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any credit rating, agreed to pay to Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. for credit ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,000 to approximately $5,000,000. MCO and Moody’s Investors Service also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of Moody’s Investors Service credit ratings and credit rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold credit ratings from Moody’s Investors Service and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance — Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy.”Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY’S affiliate, Moody’s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody’s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to “wholesale clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY’S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a “wholesale client” and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to “retail clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY’S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors.Additional terms for Japan only: Moody’s Japan K.K. (“MJKK”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody’s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody’s SF Japan K.K. (“MSFJ”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (“NRSRO”). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively.MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any credit rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for credit ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY125,000 to approximately JPY550,000,000.MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements. ​