These GOP Lawmakers Invest in Companies Funding Abortion Travel

These GOP Lawmakers Invest in Companies Funding Abortion Travel

Dozens of Republican lawmakers thrilled about the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wade together have millions of dollars personally invested in companies committed to sponsoring abortion-related travel for their employees, an Insider investigation has found. 

And at least two national anti-abortion groups told Insider that like-minded lawmakers should consider dumping their stock in companies that will facilitate their employees’ abortions.

Among the most vocal anti-abortion lawmakers to invest in abortion supporting companies is Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Republican from Georgia whose financial exposure in the pro-abortion businesses is substantial.

Together, Greene, her husband, Perry Greene, and their children may have more than half-a-million dollars invested in businesses that fund abortion travel, according to an annual financial disclosure document Greene filed in May with the US House of Representatives.

The Greenes’ investments include up to $110,000 in Tesla, up to $65,000 in Starbucks, up to $50,000 in Microsoft, up to $65,000 in Facebook, up to $50,000 in


Netflix

, up to $67,000 in Disney, up to $95,000 in Back of America, and up to $50,000 in JP Morgan Chase. 

Since joining Congress in 2021, Greene has had no qualms about investing in companies that openly conflict with her stances on various social, political or medical matters, such as when she bought stock in three major COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers while boasting of her unvaccinated status.

Perry Greene last month bought up to $295,000 worth of stock in companies that institutionally support the Black Lives Matter movement and LGBTQ+ rights, which the Georgia Republican has vehemently opposed.

Greene, who credited Donald Trump with seeding the high court with anti-abortion judges, did not respond to repeated requests for comment about any possible divestiture plans. She previously told Insider that she has an “independent investment advisor that has full discretionary authority on my accounts. I do not direct any trades.”

roe v wade abortion

Participants hold signs during the Women’s March near the US Capitol.

Leigh Vogel/Getty Images for Women’s March Inc


Capitol Hill packed with abortion-sponsor investors

Congress’ latest financial hypocrisy flows from the conservative majority of the Supreme Court’s decision to overrule Roe v. Wade on June 24, a momentous reversal that’s sparked pushback from concerned Democrats and like-minded corporations. 

With right-leaning states already racing to criminalize abortion, abortion providers, and anyone who tries to get an abortion in localities where it remains legal, a slew of well-known businesses have pledged to help workers pay for out-of-state care. 

Among them: Microsoft, Google, and Facebook, entertainment hubs Walt Disney, Netflix, and Amazon, financial institutions Wells Fargo, Bank of America, and JP Morgan Chase, as well as household names like Tesla and Starbucks. Insider cross-referenced these and other abortion-travel-funding companies with the stock holdings members of Congress listed in their annual financial disclosures and periodic stock-trade disclosures.

Repeat STOCK Act violator and anti-abortion advocate Rep. Pete Sessions of Texas may be nearly $1 million deep in the pro-abortion camp based on his 2021 annual financial report. That filing shows that he and his wife have invested up to $100,000 in Starbucks, up to $345,000 in Microsoft, up to $250,000 in Facebook, and up to $265,000 in Amazon. (Lawmakers are only required to report the value of their assets in broad ranges.) 

Sessions did not respond to repeated requests for comment about his finances. 

Rep. Diana Harshbarger of Tennessee, who previously told Insider she’s outsourced her portfolio to a financial planner, has been given until August to file her 2021 annual report after requesting an extension. If her 2020 filings hold true, Harshbarger could have nearly $700,000 attached to abortion-friendly businesses, including up to $215,000 in Microsoft, up to $115,000 in Facebook, up to $145,000 in Google, up to $115,000 in Amazon, and up to $65,000 in Bank of America. 

Harshbarger did not respond to repeated requests for comment about her finances. 

Rep. Carol Miller of West Virginia, who hailed the gutting of Roe as “a huge victory for all Americans,” also has until August to submit her 2021 annual report. In her 2020 filings Miller disclosed that her husband owned up to $250,000 in Microsoft stock. 

Miller spokesman Tatum Wallace declined to comment on any divestiture plans, but did offer Insider a glimpse into how a GOP majority might take corporate America to task about this if they regain control of Congress this fall. 

“Paying for someone to end a pregnancy sounds like a very taxable event to me,” Wallace wrote in an email. “Congresswoman Miller is confident that next year, Republicans will look at ways to update the tax code to incentivize life and address this comprehensively.”

Dozens of congressional Democrats, including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, whose day-trading husband Paul Pelosi routinely moves millions of dollars through the markets, also invest in companies that will sponsor abortion travel. 

But these Democrats almost universally support abortion rights, while their Republican counterparts have all but always fought to restrict or undo abortion rights.  

Across the Capitol, several Republican senators who publicly oppose abortion rights appear to have similar conflicts in their financial portfolios.

Among them is Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama, who describes himself as a “champion for the God-given rights of the unborn,” yet personally invests in several such companies.

From May 19 to May 20, Tuberville purchased between $300,000 and $600,000 worth of stock in PayPal, according to federal disclosures. 

On May 19 PayPal announced — in anticipation of the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wade — that it would fund employees’ out-of-state travel to access abortions.

Tuberville’s office declined to say whether the senator will divest of stock in companies that bankroll employee travel for abortions. In a statement, his office said: “Senator Tuberville has long had financial advisors who actively manage his portfolio without his day-to-day involvement.”

A personal financial disclosure from Sen. Tommy Tuberville, a Republican from Alabama.

A personal financial disclosure from Sen. Tommy Tuberville, a Republican from Alabama.

US Senate


Sen. Jerry Moran of Kansas reported stock investments of $1,000 to $15,000 each in Amazon, CVS Health, Johnson & Johnson, Meta Platforms, and Bank of America stock.

“Life is precious and deserves our respect and protection,” Moran has said of his opposition to abortion. “I have used my voice and vote to further the cause of life and defend unborn children.” 

Sen. Roger Wicker of Mississippi, who touts his “long record of upholding the sanctity of life,” reported owning $50,000 to $100,000 worth of stock in Amazon.com, which said it would pay up to $4,000 in travel expenses each year for employees to obtain medical treatments, including abortions.

Sen. John Boozman of Arkansas, a self-described “consistent and staunch advocate for the cause of protecting babies in the womb,” reported modest stock investments in Johnson & Johnson, Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, and Walt Disney Company.

Sen. Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming, who said she is “grateful for this pro-life decision” by the Supreme Court, holds between $15,000 and $50,000 in Walt Disney Co. stock and $1,000 to $15,000 worth of Microsoft stock, according to her most recent personal financial disclosure.

Representatives for Moran, Wicker, Boozman, and Lummis did not respond to requests for comment.

Anti-abortion protesters at Supreme Court

Anti-abortion protesters wear shirts that read “I am the Pro-Life Generation” as they demonstrate in front of the US Supreme Court on December 1, 2021, in Washington.

Andrew Harnik/AP


‘Eschew companies that promote abortion’

Members of Congress who oppose abortion should get rid of any stocks they own in companies that fund abortion travel and make “a public announcing of divestiture,” said Eric Scheidler, executive director of the Pro-Life Action League, a nonprofit organization dedicated to “saving unborn children through non-violent direct action.”

Lawmakers should “choose investments that fit with their values — we all have to be more intentional about this,” Scheidler said.

He recommended elected officials consider financial vehicles, such as mutual fund company Ave Maria Mutual Funds, that avoid investing in corporations that support abortion.

“We certainly think pro-life people would want to eschew companies that promote abortion,” National Right to Life Committee Executive Director David O’Steen told Insider. “Perhaps they can now look at companies that don’t make it a priority to support abortion.”

O’Steen added that anyone opposed to abortion, lawmakers or otherwise, should avoid doing business with or otherwise patronizing abortion-supporting companies.

“Avoid Disneyland,” he said.

Federal lawmakers are actively considering whether to ban themselves from trading individual stocks in part because of numerous examples of members of Congress personally investing in companies that conflict with their public duties or political positions.

Insider has recently revealed defense-related investors poised to personally profit from a recent Ukrainian aid package, environmental advocates who invest in fossil fuel-based operations, and pandemic relief supporters invested in the healthcare companies hustling to make COVID-19 manageable. 

Loading Something is loading.

GOP draft bill would tighten rules for finance firms using customer information

GOP draft bill would tighten rules for finance firms using customer information

Rep. Patrick McHenry, a Republican of North Carolina and rating member of the Home Economic Expert services Committee, speaks in the course of a listening to in Washington, D.C.

Andrew Harrer | Bloomberg | Getty Visuals

A new draft invoice from House Money Products and services Ranking Member Patrick McHenry, R-N.C., lays the groundwork for how the GOP will tackle economical data privacy if the celebration wins again the majority in the chamber this November.

The dialogue draft, shared exclusively with CNBC, would modernize a fiscal info safety legislation recognised as the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act to deal with data aggregators in addition to fiscal establishments and involve far more transparency with clients. These kinds of improvements could stop up implementing to fintech companies like Plaid or Intuit’s Mint.

The text will come on the very same working day that lawmakers on the Property Power and Commerce Committee marked up the American Facts Privateness and Safety Act, a new bipartisan framework that has introduced electronic privacy back into the limelight just as Congress prepares to wrap up for its August recess. Whilst the press for a federal privateness legislation has experienced quite a few stops and starts in the earlier, the new text furnished a renewed spark guiding the exertion as it incorporated compromises on vital challenges that had formerly stalled talks.

The draft aims to update a qualified element of the regulation and broaden it so it would keep on being applicable even in the confront of even more innovation, in accordance to a senior Republican staffer for the Economic Services Committee not licensed to converse on the document.

“We failed to want to start off with a really prescriptive and restrictive product that is heading to avoid developers from building a new application or great-tuning your application, generating new solutions,” the staffer claimed. “But we wanted to make absolutely sure that shoppers experienced all of the info to make sensible selections about what they are keen to share and what they are not ready to share.”

The discussion draft would involve the money institutions to explain to buyers when their nonpublic particular information and facts is currently being collected, not just when it is really staying disclosed to 3rd get-togethers.

It also would allow for shoppers to notify economic establishments and data aggregators to cease amassing their details or delete the information they have. In addition, it would increase the definition of individually identifiable nonpublic info topic to the regulation and corporations covered by the invoice would have to give people the capability to opt out of details assortment if it isn’t required to present company.

The draft invoice allows for federal agencies to develop regulations that acquire into consideration the perhaps larger stress of compliance on smaller sized corporations. It would also preempt point out law to generate a countrywide regular, anything that some Democrats have turned down in other privateness discussions for the reason that they see the states as essential areas to grow protections on leading of federal regulation.

“This proposal will modernize the existing framework to much better align with evolving know-how and defend versus the misuse or overuse of consumers’ particular facts,” McHenry reported in a statement. “I appear forward to continuing to function with my colleagues on this discussion draft to safe Americans’ privacy without strangling innovation.”

Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.

WACH: What you know about passwords could be all incorrect

Will companies stay silent on abortion to avoid GOP retaliation?

Will companies stay silent on abortion to avoid GOP retaliation?


New York
CNN Business
 — 

American corporations could before long locate on their own caught amongst employees’ demands for abortion access and Republican politicians’ ever more hostile attitudes toward Corporate The us. Providers may in the long run be forced to pick a side.

Firms, the moment a dependable supporter of Republican politicians and problems, have recently grown out of action with the GOP – particularly considering the fact that the Trump administration took around the White Dwelling in 2017. Problems this sort of as trade coverage, LGBT+ legal rights, well being treatment, voting rights, reproductive troubles and democratic values have driven a wedge between corporations – with progressively more youthful and socially active employees – and Republican lawmakers.

A leaked draft opinion by the Supreme Courtroom shows that a the greater part of the court’s justices look poised to overturn Roe v. Wade, the landmark 1973 final decision that assured a woman’s correct to an abortion. These developments will probably exacerbate the circumstance.

Republicans currently campaigning in principal elections have located traction in portraying substantial firms as liberal and elitist. They’ve developed strategies contacting for bans on corporations they label as “woke.”

Previous 12 months, firms that spoke in favor of shielding voting rights for citizens in Ga, Florida and Texas had been threatened with “outcomes” by some elected officials.

Most lately, Disney’s opposition to a Florida law that prohibits conversations of gender id in public colleges enraged Republican Governor Ron DeSantis and prompted him to revoke the company’s distinctive functioning privileges in the condition.

The huge vast majority of People in america assistance the ideal to abortion accessibility. Nevertheless the Supreme Court’s probable motion in opposition to Roe v. Wade could produce a condition in which as lots of as 26 states could ban abortion. That could mean thousands and thousands of women of all ages seeking an abortion would be instantly not able to afford to pay for to journey to a state that will allow the method.

Corporations will thus confront a tricky alternative: stand up for their staff members and face achievable implications from Republicans – or continue to be silent and experience a potential worker exodus.

Companies have very long approached reproductive legal rights with a head-in-the-sand dynamic, mentioned Anthony Johndrow, CEO of Reputation Economy Advisors.

Numerous have made the decision to hold out to see how the Supreme Courtroom guidelines on the difficulty prior to taking a general public stance, with most anticipating that Roe would likely stay in spot. “Hope was the strategy,” Johndrow stated. Now they need to weigh in as crimson-state staff members who help the ideal to select search to their businesses for motion.

“Big corporations have put in many years advocating for women’s equality in the workplace and abortion ban guidelines are a immediate threat to that,” he stated. “Companies are heading to have to offer with their possess workers demanding action, and responses for donations designed to politicians who help the bans.”

As organizations glance to DeSantis and Disney’s feud, they will make your mind up irrespective of whether or not to communicate out from specific politicians and anti-choice laws.

“There will most likely be a great deal of Floridas,” Johndrow claimed. “Companies have negotiated distinctive privileges from tax payments and moved their headquarters accordingly,” but point out politics can adjust that calculus, and people discounts may not be worth alienating a workforce, he added.

There’s also a chronic scarcity of labor, and expert personnel arrive at a quality, stated Ray Perryman, president and CEO of the Perryman Group, an economic study and examination organization. “When companies weigh profitability, it is going to be in their financial curiosity to communicate out on behalf of their personnel and offer with political penalties.”

Organizations have been rather silent on abortion constraints a short while ago. Texas handed a close to-complete abortion ban in September but pretty several providers took a very clear stance on the monthly bill. Texas is dwelling to nearly 10{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} of all Fortune 500 businesses.

Bumble, the relationship app organization, designed a fund to assist “the reproductive legal rights of gals and folks across the gender spectrum who search for abortions in Texas.”

Lyft and Uber mentioned they would make authorized defense resources to secure motorists who may be sued less than the Texas regulation for driving a person who receives an abortion.

Salesforce announced that it would help its workforce and their families if they want to go away Texas, and a variety of corporations including Apple, Citi and Yelp reported they would pay for staff to vacation to receive abortion treatment somewhere else.

In 2019, above 180 CEOs signed an open letter titled “Really do not Ban Equality” that described anti-reproductive-liberty guidelines as lousy for business and was posted as an advertorial in The New York Times. A 2nd letter “Don’t Ban Equality in Texas” was signed by about 80 corporations, together with Netflix and Yelp, final year.

There is a refrain of “Don’t Ban Equality” signers who are completely ready to talk out, mentioned Jen Stark, senior director at Tara Health Foundation, the business driving the letter. But there are also a range of providers ready in the wings. “We’ve been in touch with so quite a few of them above the earlier 12 hrs and it’s a seachange,” she explained. These upcoming several months, in advance of the Supreme Court troubles its official ruling, is when firm advocacy can make the best impact, she additional.

“Is it way too minor also late? I have to hope not,” Stark claimed. “I have to imagine that the personal sector is the last firewall below.”

Biden admin slammed for missing deadline to implement key GOP priority in infrastructure law

The Biden administration is staying slammed for evidently missing a deadline to carry out a critical Republican provision of the bipartisan infrastructure law that Republicans say will streamline the allowing method for new assignments.

The “One particular Federal Final decision” provision of the Infrastructure Expense and Work opportunities Act (IIJA) was to start with launched by the previous Trump administration by using executive action but was codified into legislation when Biden signed the bipartisan invoice on Nov. 15. The provision, which is supposed to go initiatives together with significantly less purple tape and fewer delays, gave the Biden administration 60 days to warn companies of categorical exclusions, which cuts down the timetable for environmental evaluate of sure projects.

BIDEN ADMINISTRATION TOUTS ‘HISTORIC INVESTMENT’ IN BRIDGES As a result of BIPARTISAN INFRASTRUCTURE Law

President Joe Biden

President Joe Biden holds his confront mask and waves as he exits Air Power One at Funds Area Global Airport, Oct. 5, 2021, in Lansing, Michigan. (AP Picture/Evan Vucci / AP Newsroom)

Republicans on the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure fear that the hold off will diminish the purchasing power of funding that is meant for infrastructure. They say the Jan. 14 deadline arrived and went with no any community report that the administration fulfilled the requirement. They have submitted an inquiry to the administration about the deadline but have not listened to back again.

“One particular Federal Decision, integrated in the IIJA, was a important Home Republican priority – which is why we bundled it in our highway monthly bill proposal previous year,” rating member Rep. Sam Graves, R-Mo., reported in a assertion to Fox Information Electronic. “With inflation reaching historical stages, the administration wants to put into action this important tax-preserving, performance-boosting provision in the infrastructure law devoid of any delays.  

Rep. Sam Graves

Rep. Sam Graves walks as a result of the Capitol on Oct. 25, 2017. (Invoice Clark/CQ Roll Call)

Click Right here TO Browse Much more ON FOX Business

“The Biden administration can not be selective about the implementation of only items of the legislation and turn it into a one particular-sided Green New Offer in all but identify,” Graves stated. “T&I Committee Republicans will be top oversight efforts to assure that One particular Federal Decision is adequately enacted as IIJA implementation efforts continue on.”

“I introduced the A person Federal Decision Act with my fellow Republicans on the Transportation & Infrastructure Committee mainly because regulatory reform on big highway projects is long overdue,” Rep. Rodney Davis, R-Unwell., stated in a assertion to Fox News Digital. “President Biden and his Administration want to entirely implement OFD, but they’ve been a lot more concerned about pushing tax hikes, shelling out will increase, and a federal takeover of our elections as a substitute of operating the federal federal government in a skilled vogue. Any hold off in utilizing OFD will cost taxpayers.”

The White Residence did not instantly react to Fox Information Digital’s ask for for comment.

President Joe Biden speaks about the infrastructure legislation though traveling to Kansas Metropolis, Missouri, on Dec. 8, 2021. (Nicholas Kamm/AFP by using Getty Photographs)

Top financial analysts dispel GOP claim that Biden agenda will fuel inflation

Republicans have been baselessly proclaiming the Make Again Far better careers proposal will worsen inflation.

For months, Republican lawmakers have asserted — with no proof — that President Joe Biden’s financial investment strategies will make inflation worse. On Tuesday, two main economical investigation products and services predicted they will not.

In an job interview with Reuters, Moody’s Trader Service vice president William Foster predicted that Biden’s just-signed $550 billion Infrastructure Expense and Jobs Act and the proposed $1.75 trillion Construct Back again Much better local climate and caregiving infrastructure proposal “should really not have any true material influence on inflation.”

Finch Scores senior director Charles Seville explained to the wire support that the two measures “will neither strengthen nor quell inflation substantially in the small-run” but could in fact boost the labor supply and productivity in the more time time period.

The White Household and congressional Democrats have dismissed GOP assertions that their proposed investments will fuel greater selling prices and have famous that provisions in the charges to make improvements to infrastructure and boy or girl care will truly help curb inflation in excess of the next ten years.

They have cited a group of Nobel Prize-successful economists who say Make Again Greater is part of the remedy, not the issue. “Because this agenda invests in very long-expression financial ability and will boost the capability of much more Individuals to take part productively in the financial system, it will simplicity more time-term inflationary pressures,” Columbia College professor Joseph Stiglitz advised the Washington Write-up on Nov. 4.

On Tuesday, Moody’s Analytics main economist Mark Zandi echoed those people predictions, telling Reuters the two measures “do not incorporate to inflation pressures, as the procedures assistance to lift very long-term economic progress via stronger efficiency and labor pressure development, and thus just take the edge off of inflation.”

Continue to, regardless of growing evidence that they are wrong, Republican lawmakers have continued to parrot the prediction that Create Back Better will spur significant inflation.

“No person is purchasing Joe Biden’s claim that his massive authorities investing bill is likely to lessen inflation,” tweeted Rep. Mo Brooks of Alabama on Tuesday. “It’s Biden and Pelosi’s limitless investing that is producing inflation! Just reveals how Socialist Democrats lie to the American men and women.”

Democrats have expended TRILLIONS in 2021 and they want to shell out TRILLIONS a lot more,” complained California Rep. Tom McClintock. “Inflation is only going to get Even worse and it can be difficult-doing the job Americans who will spend the price tag for their unsuccessful guidelines.”

“Will not be fooled – this socialist shelling out rip-off will exacerbate the inflation disaster,” warned Texas Rep. Beth Van Duyne.

Sen. Rob Portman (R-OH), who backed the bipartisan Infrastructure Financial investment and Positions Act, even claimed that the bill he voted for “provides to the offer side of the financial system, and will be counter-inflationary,” but that the Create Back again Greater proposal “will enhance inflation via enormous stimulus paying and damage the overall economy via massive tax raises.”

When Republicans have been blaming Biden’s shelling out programs for the growing price of products — even blaming the not-nevertheless-handed proposals for the difficulty — lots of authorities say current inflation is in fact being prompted by other aspects. These include things like the amplified demand from customers for products as the financial system reopened after COVID-19 pandemic shutdowns and troubles with global source chains.

Nevertheless, some Republicans are signaling they approach to carry on to demagogue their opponents above the situation.

“You can see what’s likely to transpire following. We are going to continue on to have inflation, and then interest fees will go up,” Florida Sen. Rick Scott, who heads the Countrywide Republican Senatorial Committee, instructed the Wall Road Journal on Sunday. “This is a gold mine for us.”

The Household is anticipated to vote on the Make Back Far better proposal right before Thanksgiving.

Posted with authorization of The American Independent Basis.