Posts Spread Unfounded Claims About Disney Company’s Financial Health

Posts Spread Unfounded Claims About Disney Company’s Financial Health

Quick Take

The Disney Company opposed Florida’s “Parental Rights in Education” law, also referred to by critics as “Don’t Say Gay.” Disney’s actions sparked calls from conservatives for a boycott of Disney — and a flurry of unfounded or exaggerated claims on social media that the company was suffering declines in subscribers, visitors and stock value.


Full Story 

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis signed the controversial “Parental Rights in Education” bill — also known as “Don’t Say Gay” — on March 28. The law, which is set to take effect July 1, prohibits discussion of sexuality and gender identity with students in kindergarten through third grade. 

“Classroom instruction by school personnel or third parties on sexual orientation or gender identity may not occur in kindergarten through grade 3 or in a manner that is not age-appropriate or developmentally appropriate for students in accordance with state standards,” the law states. 

Critics of the law say vague language, such as, “in a manner that is not age-appropriate or developmentally appropriate for students” — along with the avoidance of using words such as “gay,”  “lesbian,” “transgender” or “nonbinary” —  allows the law to cloak harmful effects it could have on members of the LGBTQ community. 

Target, Starbucks and more than 200 other companies and organizations have publicly opposed or signed a statement from the Human Rights Campaign, the nation’s largest LGBTQ advocacy group, broadly condemning all anti-LGBTQ legislation.

After the Walt Disney Company faced backlash from employees for not speaking out against the bill, Disney CEO Bob Chapek announced the company’s opposition to the proposed legislation and signed the Human Rights Campaign’s statement.

In addition, Charlee Corra, a Disney heir, came out publicly as transgender while condemning anti-LGBTQ bills and announcing up to $250,000 in donations to the Human Rights Campaign. The amount was later raised to $500,000 by Roy P. Disney, the grandson of Roy O. Disney, a co-founder of the Disney company. 

Conservatives then began a movement to boycott Disney, which was followed by posts on social media claiming without evidence that Disney was losing subscribers, visitors and stock market value.

“Disney Plus has had more than 350,000 cancellations in the past five days alone,” read a Facebook post shared on April 12, which included an image of Mickey Mouse snared in a mousetrap.

Another Facebook post shared a screenshot of a now-deleted tweet from Robert Hyde, a Republican U.S. Senate candidate from Connecticut. Hyde’s tweet claimed, “Disney’s stock is down more than 70{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} and attendance is down more than 55{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}. 10.1 million people canceled their Disney Plus subscription. Everything woke goes broke. #Groomers.”

Those claims, however, are either highly inflated or unfounded.

Streaming networks — including Disney Plus — don’t typically provide an ongoing count of their total subscribers. The information needed to make the claim that Disney Plus was losing subscribers in a matter of days is not publicly available. 

The last time Disney disclosed the number of subscribers on Disney Plus was in its first quarter earnings report for fiscal 2022 released in February. The company reported “a significant increase in total subscriptions across our streaming portfolio to 196.4 million, including 11.8 million Disney+ subscribers added in the first quarter.” The company will disclose its second quarter earnings report on May 11.

While Disney’s stock has declined over the past year, it’s not by “more than 70{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}” as claimed in posts shared on social media. The company was trading at $131.67 on April 14, down 30{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} from its 52-week high of $190.40.

The stock has been generally trending down since around September 2020, but since March 10 — when Chapek made a statement against the bill — the trading price has only decreased from 133.64 on March 10 to 130.47 on April 15. That is just a 2{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} decline in a little over a month. 

Attendance at Disney’s theme parks fell an average of 68{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} during the COVID-19 pandemic. But Disney has been rebounding, according to company newsletters. It reported more than $7 billion in revenue over the first quarter of fiscal 2022, compared to $3.6 billion in the prior-year quarter, and was reaching capacity attendance at some parks in March.

We reached out to Disney for comment on the claims in the social media posts, but we didn’t hear back.

Editor’s note: FactCheck.org is one of several organizations working with Facebook to debunk misinformation shared on social media. Our previous stories can be found here. Facebook has no control over our editorial content.  

Sources

2020 Theme Park Attendance Report Quantifies COVID-19 Impact on Disney Parks.” BlogMickey.com. 6 Oct 2021.

Abcarian, Robin. “Column: Amid Florida’s fight with Disney over LGBTQ rights, a Disney family member comes out as trans.” Los Angeles Times. 10 Apr 2022. 

Boardwine, Andrew. “Already Reaching Capacity, Disney World Expects Massive Spring Break Crowds.” Inside the Magic. 28 Feb 2022.

Blair, Elizabeth. “After protests, Disney CEO speaks out against Florida’s ‘Don’t Say Gay’ bill.” NPR. Updated 10 Mar 2022. 

Business Statement on Anti-LGBTQ State Legislation.” Freedom For All Americans. Updated 12 Apr 2022.

Casale, Maddy. “Why Are People Canceling Disney Plus?” Decider. 8 Apr 2022. 

Constantino, Annika Kim. “Businesses oppose Florida’s ‘Don’t Say Gay’ ban on discussion of LGBTQ issues in public schools.” CNBC. Updated 31 Mar 2022.  

Coffey, Kelly. “Disney Parks Revenue Brings In Over $7 Billion In First Quarter of 2022.” Inside the Magic. 9 Feb 2022.

Designerpirate (@designerpirate). “The world is full of amazing places. #boycottdisney.” Twitter. 7 Apr 2022. 

Diaz, Jaclyn. “Florida’s governor signs controversial law opponents dubbed ‘Don’t Say Gay’.” NPR. 28 Mar 2022.

Hesse, Monica. “There’s a reason the ‘don’t say gay’ bills don’t say what they mean.” Washington Post. 12 Apr 2022.

Juxtaposed Ideas. “Disney: Down 30{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} – Buy Now To Own Your Next Century Marvel Magic.” Seeking Alpha. 11 Apr 2022.

Munson, Emilie. “Controversy destroyed his 2020 campaign, but Robert Hyde will run again in 2022.” Connecticut Post. Updated 9 Nov 2020. 

Rufo, Christopher F. (@realchrisrufo). “Parents in Southern California have organized a rally to #BoycottDisney. They want the company to stop promoting gender ideology to children.” Twitter. 6 Apr 2022. 

THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY REPORTS FIRST QUARTER EARNINGS FOR FISCAL 2022.” Walt Disney Company. 9 Feb 2022.

White, Abbey. “Disney Companies Post Social Media Statements Denouncing Anti-LGBTQ Legislation Ahead of Walkout.” Hollywood Reporter. 22 Mar 2022.

Yang, Maya. “Florida’s ‘don’t say gay’ bill inspired a chilling wave of Republican legislation.” The Guardian. 11 Apr 2022.

Evli Bank’s demerger and the remaining company’s merger with Fellow Finance have been registered; Evli Plc’s listing application has been approved and trading in shares will commence on April 4, 2022

Evli Bank’s demerger and the remaining company’s merger with Fellow Finance have been registered; Evli Plc’s listing application has been approved and trading in shares will commence on April 4, 2022
Evli Bank Plc

Evli Bank Plc

EVLI PLC Stock Exchange Launch 2 APRIL 2022 AT 4.00 PM. EET

NOT FOR PUBLICATION OR DISTRIBUTION, IN Full OR IN Part, Directly OR INDIRECTLY, IN OR INTO AUSTRALIA, SOUTH AFRICA, HONG KONG, JAPAN, CANADA OR SINGAPORE, NEW ZEALAND, THE UNITED STATES OR ANY OTHER JURISDICTION Exactly where These PUBLICATION OR DISTRIBUTION WOULD VIOLATE Applicable Laws OR Policies OR WOULD Have to have Supplemental Paperwork TO BE Done OR REGISTERED OR Need ANY Evaluate TO BE Carried out IN ADDITION TO THE Needs Beneath FINNISH Regulation. SEE Critical Detect Beneath.

Evli Financial institution Plc and Fellow Finance Plc announced on July 14, 2021 that they have agreed in a mixture settlement of an arrangement whereby Evli Lender will demerge via a partial demerger into a new asset management group Evli Plc (“Evli”) (the “Demerger”) that will be outlined and a corporation that will have on Evli Lender Plc’s banking companies and into which Fellow Finance Plc will merge (the “Merger”).

The Demerger and the Merger have been registered with the trade sign-up maintained by the Finnish Patent and Registration Business on the helpful date of April 2, 2022. Pursuing the completion of the Demerger Nasdaq Helsinki Ltd (“Nasdaq Helsinki”) has approved the listing application relating to the course B shares of Evli. Investing in Evli’s 9,364,289 course B shares to be admitted to investing on the official listing of Nasdaq Helsinki beneath the trading code EVLI (ISIN code: FI4000513437) will begin on April 4, 2022.

The Evli shares issued as demerger consideration have been registered on the book-entry accounts of Evli’s shareholders these days on April 2, 2022. Recipients of the demerger thing to consider shares may perhaps trade Evli’s class B shares as from Monday, April 4, 2022.

EVLI PLC


Further more information:

Juho Mikola, CFO, Evli Plc, tel. +358 40 717 8888, juho.mikola@evli.com


Evli in short

We see wealth as an engine to generate development. We attract on our heritage, wide know-how and Nordic values to expand and handle wealth for institutions, firms and private people in a accountable way.

We are the foremost asset manager in Finland* featuring a wide range of solutions including mutual money, asset administration and funds marketplaces expert services, alternate financial commitment solutions, fairness analysis, share plan design and administration as well as Company Finance services. Responsible investing is integrated in each and every investment decision decision and our abilities is greatly acknowledged by our purchasers. Evli has Finland’s very best know-how in dependable investment decision.**

Evli Group employs about 290 professionals and Evli has a total of EUR 17.5 billion in client property less than management (web 12/2021). Evli Plc’s B shares are mentioned on Nasdaq Helsinki Ltd.

*Kantar Prospera External Asset Administration Finland 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2021, Kantar Prospera Private Banking 2019, 2020 Finland **SFR Scandinavian Fiscal Investigate Institutional Investment decision Expert services Finland 2021

Distribution: Nasdaq Helsinki, most important media, www.evli.com


Critical Recognize

This launch is not an offer you of shares in the United States and it is not meant for distribution in or into the United States or in any other jurisdiction in which this kind of distribution would be prohibited by applicable law. Evli’s shares have not been and will not be been registered underneath the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) or the securities regulations of any state of the United States, and could not be offered, bought or delivered in or into the United States, besides pursuant to an relevant exemption of, or in a transaction not topic to, the Securities Act.

This launch does neither constitute an present to provide nor a solicitation of an present to invest in any securities by Evli in the United States or any other jurisdiction in which this kind of giving, solicitation or sale would be unlawful. This release ought to not be forwarded, distributed or sent, specifically or indirectly, in full or in aspect, in or into the United States or any jurisdiction in which the distribution of this launch would breach any relevant legislation or regulation or would involve any registration or licensing within such jurisdiction. Failure to comply with the foregoing limitation might consequence in a violation of the Securities Act or other applicable securities legislation or polices.

This release incorporates “forward-searching statements” that are dependent on existing strategies, estimates, projections and anticipations and are not assures of long term overall performance. They are based mostly on selected expectations and assumptions, which, even even though they feel to be acceptable at current, might convert out to be incorrect. Shareholders need to not count on these ahead-looking statements. Neither Evli nor any of their respective affiliate marketers, advisors or associates or any other human being undertakes any obligation to assessment or verify or to launch publicly any revisions to any forward-searching statements to reflect events that come about or circumstances that arise soon after the day of this launch.

Home Credit Vietnam Finance Company Limited — Moody’s withdraws Home Credit Vietnam Finance Company’s ratings due to business reasons

Rating Motion: Moody’s withdraws Residence Credit score Vietnam Finance Firm’s scores thanks to company reasonsGlobal Credit history Investigate – 13 Jan 2022Singapore, January 13, 2022 — Moody’s Traders Support has right now withdrawn the adhering to rankings of Household Credit history Vietnam Finance Enterprise Constrained.- Extensive-time period Issuer Scores (Overseas and Local Currency) of B3- Company Relatives Ranking of B3The rating outlook was secure prior to the withdrawal.Ratings RATIONALEMoody’s has resolved to withdraw the ratings for its very own enterprise causes. You should refer to the Moody’s Traders Service Policy for Withdrawal of Credit history Rankings, readily available on its website, www.moodys.com.Home Credit score Vietnam Finance Organization Minimal (HCV), headquartered in Ho Chi Minh Metropolis, claimed full assets of VND22 trillion as of 31 December 2020.REGULATORY DISCLOSURESFor any influenced securities or rated entities obtaining immediate credit history assist from the principal entity(ies) of this credit rating rating motion, and whose ratings might adjust as a final result of this credit score rating motion, the affiliated regulatory disclosures will be those people of the guarantor entity. Exceptions to this solution exist for the adhering to disclosures, if applicable to jurisdiction: Ancillary Providers, Disclosure to rated entity, Disclosure from rated entity.The scores have been disclosed to the rated entity or its specified agent(s) and issued with no amendment resulting from that disclosure.These ratings are solicited. Make sure you refer to Moody’s Policy for Designating and Assigning Unsolicited Credit Rankings readily available on its website www.moodys.com.Regulatory disclosures contained in this press launch use to the credit rating rating and, if applicable, the linked rating outlook or score evaluation.Moody’s normal concepts for evaluating environmental, social and governance (ESG) risks in our credit rating assessment can be observed at http://www.moodys.com/researchdocumentcontentpage.aspx?docid=PBC_1288235.The World Scale Credit Ranking on this Credit Rating Announcement was issued by a person of Moody’s affiliates outside the house the EU and is endorsed by Moody’s Deutschland GmbH, An der Welle 5, Frankfurt am Key 60322, Germany, in accordance with Art.4 paragraph 3 of the Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 on Credit score Rating Agencies. More facts on the EU endorsement standing and on the Moody’s business office that issued the credit score rating is obtainable on www.moodys.com.The International Scale Credit score Score on this Credit Score Announcement was issued by 1 of Moody’s affiliate marketers outside the house the British isles and is endorsed by Moody’s Buyers Services Limited, One Canada Sq., Canary Wharf, London E14 5FA under the law applicable to credit ranking agencies in the British isles. Further more facts on the British isles endorsement position and on the Moody’s business office that issued the credit score score is available on www.moodys.com.Be sure to see www.moodys.com for any updates on variations to the direct rating analyst and to the Moody’s legal entity that has issued the ranking.Remember to see the rankings tab on the issuer/entity web page on www.moodys.com for more regulatory disclosures for each credit history score. Rebecca Tan VP-Senior Analyst/CSR Monetary Institutions Group Moody’s Traders Services Singapore Pte. Ltd. 50 Raffles Location #23-06 Singapore Land Tower Singapore 48623 Singapore JOURNALISTS: 852 3758 1350 Consumer Support: 852 3551 3077 Graeme Knowd MD – Banking Fiscal Establishments Group JOURNALISTS: 852 3758 1350 Shopper Provider: 852 3551 3077 Releasing Office environment: Moody’s Buyers Support Singapore Pte. Ltd. 50 Raffles Position #23-06 Singapore Land Tower Singapore 48623 Singapore JOURNALISTS: 852 3758 1350 Consumer Support: 852 3551 3077 © 2022 Moody’s Corporation, Moody’s Investors Assistance, Inc., Moody’s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, “MOODY’S”). All legal rights reserved.Credit Scores ISSUED BY MOODY’S Credit Scores Affiliate marketers ARE THEIR Current Views OF THE RELATIVE Long run Credit rating Danger OF ENTITIES, Credit rating COMMITMENTS, OR Debt OR Credit card debt-LIKE SECURITIES, AND Products, Items, Solutions AND Information Posted BY MOODY’S (COLLECTIVELY, “PUBLICATIONS”) May well Consist of These types of Recent Thoughts. MOODY’S DEFINES Credit rating Hazard AS THE Threat THAT AN ENTITY May possibly NOT Satisfy ITS CONTRACTUAL Fiscal OBLIGATIONS AS THEY Come Due AND ANY Estimated Financial Decline IN THE Celebration OF DEFAULT OR IMPAIRMENT. SEE Relevant MOODY’S Score SYMBOLS AND DEFINITIONS PUBLICATION FOR Data ON THE Types OF CONTRACTUAL Money OBLIGATIONS Addressed BY MOODY’S Credit history Rankings. Credit rating Rankings DO NOT Handle ANY OTHER Hazard, Including BUT NOT Limited TO: LIQUIDITY Chance, Sector Worth Danger, OR Cost VOLATILITY. Credit rating Ratings, NON-Credit history ASSESSMENTS (“ASSESSMENTS”), AND OTHER Thoughts Integrated IN MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF Recent OR Historic Fact. MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS May well ALSO Consist of QUANTITATIVE Model-Based mostly ESTIMATES OF Credit score Possibility AND Related Viewpoints OR COMMENTARY Printed BY MOODY’S ANALYTICS, INC. AND/OR ITS Affiliates. MOODY’S Credit history Scores, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER Views AND PUBLICATIONS DO NOT Represent OR Offer Investment decision OR Economic Assistance, AND MOODY’S Credit Ratings, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER Views AND PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT Provide Recommendations TO Acquire, Offer, OR Hold Individual SECURITIES. MOODY’S Credit history Rankings, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER Thoughts AND PUBLICATIONS DO NOT Comment ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN Financial investment FOR ANY Unique Trader. MOODY’S Concerns ITS Credit history Scores, ASSESSMENTS AND OTHER Thoughts AND PUBLISHES ITS PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND Understanding THAT Each and every Investor WILL, WITH Owing Care, MAKE ITS Possess Study AND Analysis OF Just about every Security THAT IS Beneath Thought FOR Order, Holding, OR SALE.MOODY’S Credit Scores, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER Thoughts, AND PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT Meant FOR USE BY RETAIL Investors AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL Investors TO USE MOODY’S Credit score Ratings, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER Thoughts OR PUBLICATIONS WHEN Creating AN Expenditure Determination. IF IN Question YOU Must Contact YOUR Money OR OTHER Professional ADVISER.ALL Details CONTAINED HEREIN IS Protected BY Law, Such as BUT NOT Restricted TO, COPYRIGHT Legislation, AND NONE OF These kinds of Information and facts May possibly BE COPIED OR Or else REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, Further TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR Saved FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY These kinds of Intent, IN Total OR IN Section, IN ANY Type OR Manner OR BY ANY Indicates By any means, BY ANY Particular person With out MOODY’S PRIOR Prepared CONSENT.MOODY’S Credit score Rankings, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER Viewpoints AND PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT Intended FOR USE BY ANY Man or woman AS A BENCHMARK AS THAT Phrase IS Described FOR REGULATORY Applications AND Should NOT BE Used IN ANY WAY THAT COULD Consequence IN THEM Remaining Regarded as A BENCHMARK.All info contained herein is obtained by MOODY’S from sources thought by it to be accurate and trustworthy. For the reason that of the probability of human or mechanical error as effectively as other components, even so, all data contained herein is delivered “AS IS” with out guarantee of any type. MOODY’S adopts all needed actions so that the data it utilizes in assigning a credit rating score is of adequate quality and from resources MOODY’S considers to be reliable together with, when ideal, independent third-bash sources. On the other hand, MOODY’S is not an auditor and are unable to in every instance independently verify or validate details received in the score process or in making ready its Publications.To the extent permitted by regulation, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, brokers, reps, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any human being or entity for any oblique, unique, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in relationship with the details contained herein or the use of or lack of ability to use any such info, even if MOODY’S or any of its administrators, officers, workforce, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is encouraged in advance of the possibility of these kinds of losses or damages, together with but not minimal to: (a) any reduction of existing or future income or (b) any decline or harm arising where the related economic instrument is not the topic of a certain credit rating assigned by MOODY’S.To the extent permitted by regulation, MOODY’S and its administrators, officers, personnel, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any human being or entity, which include but not constrained to by any carelessness (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of legal responsibility that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law can not be excluded) on the element of, or any contingency in just or outside of the handle of, MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, brokers, associates, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in relationship with the information and facts contained herein or the use of or inability to use any this sort of data.NO Guarantee, Categorical OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE Accuracy, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR Health FOR ANY Distinct Reason OF ANY Credit score Ranking, Assessment, OTHER Belief OR Information and facts IS Specified OR Designed BY MOODY’S IN ANY Form OR Method In any respect.Moody’s Investors Assistance, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Corporation (“MCO”), hereby discloses that most issuers of credit card debt securities (together with company and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and business paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody’s Investors Provider, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any credit score score, agreed to pay back to Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. for credit ratings opinions and solutions rendered by it expenses ranging from $1,000 to about $5,000,000. MCO and Moody’s Buyers Service also maintain policies and methods to handle the independence of Moody’s Buyers Service credit score scores and credit rating score processes. Information concerning particular affiliations that may well exist among directors of MCO and rated entities, and concerning entities who keep credit history ratings from Moody’s Buyers Assistance and have also publicly described to the SEC an possession fascination in MCO of additional than 5{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996}, is posted every year at www.moodys.com less than the heading “Investor Relations — Company Governance — Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy.”Additional conditions for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Economical Providers License of MOODY’S affiliate, Moody’s Investors Assistance Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody’s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as relevant). This doc is supposed to be provided only to “wholesale clients” inside of the this means of part 761G of the Organizations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from inside of Australia, you stand for to MOODY’S that you are, or are accessing the doc as a agent of, a “wholesale client” and that neither you nor the entity you symbolize will right or indirectly disseminate this doc or its contents to “retail clients” in just the this means of area 761G of the Firms Act 2001. MOODY’S credit history rating is an belief as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the fairness securities of the issuer or any form of stability that is offered to retail traders.Added conditions for Japan only: Moody’s Japan K.K. (“MJKK”) is a wholly-owned credit rating company subsidiary of Moody’s Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody’s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody’s SF Japan K.K. (“MSFJ”) is a wholly-owned credit ranking company subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Business (“NRSRO”). For that reason, credit rating ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit rating Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit score Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, therefore, the rated obligation will not qualify for selected kinds of procedure underneath U.S. guidelines. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating score agencies registered with the Japan Money Products and services Company and their registration figures are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively.MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (together with company and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and professional paper) and preferred inventory rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as relevant) have, prior to assignment of any credit rating score, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as relevant) for credit score ratings opinions and expert services rendered by it charges ranging from JPY100,000 to somewhere around JPY550,000,000.MJKK and MSFJ also maintain guidelines and methods to handle Japanese regulatory requirements. ​

14 Ways Remote Teams Can Impact A Company’s Financial (And Overall) Health

Around the world, the pandemic spurred a significant rise in remote work arrangements. Regardless of industry or business model, remote teams can have significant impacts—both positive and negative—on a company’s overall financial health. In some cases, remote teams require a company to buy new technology in order for employees to accomplish their work. On the other hand, many companies are saving significant amounts of money by not maintaining a physical office—and some are even seeing increased productivity.

As more companies are beginning to make the decision on whether to continue with remote work, head back to the office or settle on an arrangement that combines the two, it’s essential for leaders to carefully consider what’s right for their unique situation. Below, 14 members of Forbes Finance Council share ways your remote team may be impacting your company’s finances.

1. Increased Procrastination And Competition For Resources

I faced one of the negative effects of remote work: increased procrastination caused by a lack of communication. Additionally, there was a cost increase caused by remote market globalization—more and more businesses began going remote, so they started hiring employees globally. Before the pandemic, we had to compete for resources locally. Now we have to compete globally. – Peter Shubenok, RNDpoint

2. Potential Communications Breakdowns

A lack of communication can create headaches for remote teams. I have worked remotely since 2005, and I have found that increased communication is critical to meeting deadlines and avoiding misunderstandings. – Paul Davis, Strategic Resource Management


Forbes Finance Council is an invitation-only organization for executives in successful accounting, financial planning and wealth management firms. Do I qualify?


3. Higher Travel Costs

As we start coming back to work, remote teams will need to begin meeting up with their broader team at a central location every few months. This will mean that employees who rarely traveled, such as product managers and engineers, will be making four to six trips in a year that they didn’t before. Finance teams need to account for enabling these remote employees to spend time together, along with the associated costs. – Robin Gandhi, TripActions Liquid

4. The Need For A Robust Culture 

Working for a remote-first fintech, remote teams are quite literally the lifeblood of our organization. It can be easy to dismiss the concept of culture in remote teams, but when created, supported and pushed to thrive, culture can have a dramatic impact on the financial and overall success of an organization. Happy, engaged employees undisputedly do better work. – Michelle Prohaska, NYMBUS

5. Lower Overhead Costs

Remote work enables companies to remove traditional fixed overhead costs from their financials. Specific expenses, including rent, office supplies, utilities and salaries based on “handcuffed” geographies tied to a central office, can be reduced or eliminated from forward-looking plans. With these savings, management can invest more in R&D or employee learning to drive top-line growth. – John Tytko, Caremerge, Inc.

6. Reduced Need For Physical Expansions

We had considered expanding the physical footprint of our business regionally and nationally before Covid. Then everyone became more comfortable meeting virtually using services such as Zoom. Now, without leaving our office, we’re meeting with clients nationwide. So we’ve expanded our business not through remote teams as much as a remote business model—working with clients in other cities virtually. – Bill Keen, Keen Wealth Advisors

7. More Time Saved For Working And Expense Savings For Employees

Remote workers don’t need to spend money on commuting, eating out, dry cleaning, pet care and so on. On average, Americans spend almost one hour per day in total commute time. If employees capture 100{21df340e03e388cc75c411746d1a214f72c176b221768b7ada42b4d751988996} of their “no-need-to-commute” expense savings but allocate 30 minutes more per day to working—splitting the time savings differential with their employer—they win, and their employers win. – Sean Brown, YCharts

8. Boosted Productivity

A hybrid model with some team members working remotely seems ideal. Less office space and resources are required, and studies have shown that working from home has boosted productivity in many ways. This is also a keen “perk” or benefit in today’s competitive recruiting landscape. Many would even take slightly less pay to be able to work from home. – Leslie Heimer, American Liberty Mortgage | Stockworth

9. Savings On Health Benefits

Offering benefits to a remote team, often scattered across the country, presents its share of unique financial challenges—but also potential savings opportunities. Extra vigilance is required when selecting and structuring benefit offerings. A high-deductible health plan paired with an employer-sponsored health savings account program can realize short- and long-term financial benefits for both the company and its employees. – Tom Torre, Bend Financial

10. Compromised Company Security

When employees are too relaxed about security compliance, it can put your entire company at risk for cyberthreats. To mitigate risk, invest in implementing automated phishing simulations and training videos and set up two-factor authentication. Educating remote teams on cybersecurity is crucial for keeping your company secure from costly threats. – Jody Grunden, Summit CPA Group

11. Access To Global Talent Pool

Remote teams empower companies to access the global talent pool at a fraction of the cost, which in turn drastically reduces recruitment costs—thereby directly impacting the bottom line of organizations that rely heavily on the brainpower of their workforce. – Anil Grandhi, AG FinTax

12. More Focus On Teamwork, Communication And Goals

Remote teams can get the business to focus on teamwork, communication and goals. There are software tools to help you monitor all areas of your business and track the output of employees. This higher level of business monitoring can help focus teams on profitability and customer-centric actions. Trusted employees may be more productive remotely with the time added to the workday and measured output. – Dave Sackett, Visibility Corporation

13. Lower Tax Liability

Among the positive financial aspects of remote teams are the cost savings that come from reduced office spaces and insurance. But other savings include not dishing out huge local payroll taxes in cities such as San Francisco and New York. Utilizing remote teams can also lead to savings for the employees, including the elimination of commuting expenses—plus, they’re not losing any time commuting, which adds to the company’s benefit. – Kurt Kunselman, AccountingSuite™

14. Better Client Engagement

Unlike the days when client meetings meant costly travel and time away for commuting, remote teams can reach clients more frequently for video or call check-ins. Technology such as Zoom meetings also allows you to keep more members of your team engaged. – Sonya Thadhani Mughal, Bailard, Inc.